Mr.Scott

I'm not rebelling against anything. I have my opinion, just like everyone else here does, and I voice it. And I DON'T care about anybody else but my team here. Why should I? I owe nobody anything here. Also, are you insinuating my team looks bad? Hahahaha, my team is squeaky clean compared to some here. You need to pick and choose your battles better, instead of singling me and my team out. Sorry man, I usually show a little more respect to staff members, but right now you're pushing my buttons needlessly. The last thing I come to a benchmark forum for is a lecture on my attitude and how the world works.

Here's a tip: Anytime the word "cheat" is used here, doesn't relax anybody, joke or not. You're off the hook because I sincerely believe you right now.

I understand perfectly. Your true colors show in post #18.

Why? You promoted it by calling him a cheat. Let's get it out in the open.

The one you linked has no wmv9 on the desktop, it stays. Let it get blocked if you think it's a bugged run.

Maybe you would like me to moderate the entire board then too. If you're in doubt, report them. I'm not about to rifle through every single submission somebody doesn't like. I took care of this one as a show of good faith.

Wouldn't one think it's a little ridiculous to pull a blatant cheat for 2 crummy points? Bug maybe, cheat, ridiculous. I'll be a good captain and pull it down though. That should satisfy everybody.

There are more important changes to be made than my attitude. I suggest you concentrate on those. I'll be just fine. Thanks for your opinion though.

Take it down Austin. Re-run it without wmv9 on your desktop. Then it will be up to the clowns to actually prove that you used it.

Of coarse not. That would be violating the rules.

Getting the hang of it now I see. Good job.

Really?....how?...by using illegal software tweaks?

Thank you Evocarlos, that pretty much validates what my team mate is saying.

I understand. It's a valid request.

Nothing like calling a spade a spade, is there?

Nice job big Al.

Points are back, but I'm going to submit a faster one anyway. That way everybody knows I'm on the up and up and there's no more trouble.

I'm thinking you have bigger fish to fry than censoring avvys. You have some more brown stuff on your nose dude.

Understood. Thank you.

I have no backup image. I'll delete it and re-run it later if that's what I must do to restore my points that shouldn't have been blocked in the first place. The score isn't out of line for the clocks. Thanks for the info Thor.

http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/1019106_mr.scott_wprime_32m_athlon_64_4000_san_diego_50sec_265ms&popup=true This submission was blocked because the SS was destroyed by the server crash. You can plainly see that the whole image is distorted including the desktop, not just the applications running on it. I don't think that's very fair. I can report missing/bad shot's too. As a matter of fact I have, and they we're let go.

Give 'em hell buddy.

http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/945051_hs_cpu_z_sempron_2600_athlon_xp_2877_mhz Not a Sempron, wrong multi. Reported the submissions in CPU-Z, and Wprime32m and 1024m, but there are no screenshots in SPI1m, SPI32m, or Pifast. All were submitted on the same day, so I assume they're all on the same wrong CPU. All should be blocked or moved. tia:)

If the proof is there, why not lay it on the line? Who is being protected that this hasn't been done already? Wait, lemme guess, some of the heavy hitters that HWBot is planning on using to suck in the manufacturers.

It IS a dictatorship, all sites are. The site owner has final say over everything that goes on his/her site. No owner in their right mind would let the population tell him/her how to run or what goes on his/her site. However, a conscientious owner would take the populations opinion into account before he/she made radical decisions that may affect the wellbeing of the population and of one's own site.