yosarianilives

Looks like I'll need to rebench

cpu-z windows have to be on screen when you save the file for it's screenshot

Well all the changes are supposedly based on what we all asked for. So you only have your fellow benchers to blame that a bench that bases res on desktop res had it's pts pulled. For catzilla I don't know the reason, but perhaps people are tired of making ram drives because a "3d" bench adds load time to the score?

I don't know why you're so salty. If the pts are so "ez" to get then there is no reason you can't go get them. They're on cheap hw. So if you aren't able to go get them then perhaps you need to get better at OC? You can push the crap outta anything, case in point my recent work on intel igpus. Too many lame OCs there, so I've been working to get rid of their pts

Do you know how this works? I haven't seen xtu run on any other westmere chips but there's quite a few scores on this cpu. https://hwbot.org/benchmark/xtu/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2150&cores=2#start=0#interval=20 edit: nvm, just noticed that they're all i3 3310m that somehow were allowed to be subbed as 330m. Could one of the mods maybe fix?

I've noticed with the hw db sometimes it shows up at the bottom of the page not the right, probably due to resolution. So try scrolling down. For the pts for those benchmarks. They literally have had pts pulled from them. Go to the benchmarks page on hwbot and you'll see.

Ty

All of the benches you just mentioned aren't worth pts. You can check which ones are worth pts by looking at the benchmarks tab on hwbot.

Probably the lowest score I've seen yet, and I don't think this is just a result of the test crashing

What can I say? I go hard, there are too many laaame intel igpu ocs on here getting pts and I aim to fix that

Amen!

Another massive score from kingpin! Keep it up!

100% score here, no monitor pull required!

If you can't beat them at effeciency outclock them! Really need to get some better ram, but it's a shame that nobody has really pushed this igpu. 1900+ is no problem with some bclk at 1.75v to the igpu, yet everyone sits at 1500 mhz. Laaaame

Will be interesting to see the results of this one, I've always been interested in xeon phi as kind of this wacky thing from intel, as a sort of solution without a problem. The newest one was the only one that I could find a real use for, and that's only because it finally has "real" cpu cores so would work good for a vm server or something.

Lol, people complaining about having subs removed for no background. True they failed to communicate it going into the 1st weekend of the comp, but I have to ask who subs a score weekend 1 that they don't feel they could do better next session? The big scores drop last week of comp almost always. I know there are some exceptions like when OCN destroyed the ddr2 record early in team cup last year, but those are exceptions not a rule. I know I have no issue having my 2600k subs taken down, I was already benching the 2600k for hd 3000 and figured I'd bench the relevant benches while I was at it. Tbh I was planning on rebenching anyways as that 2600k doesn't go above 5.35 ghz (or I don't know how to oc sandy, very likely) and I found a deal so I have 4 2600ks on the way. Plus 32m in win 7? I can drop 30s off that score without improving my oc at all. So I think being forced to rebench gives us all an excuse to get bigger scores before the comp is over. One thing I wonder about that I may've missed, so is sandy-e allowed for div 7? Or was that a mistake? Cause I don't feel like getting destroyed by "lame" 3930k oc when I push my 2600k.

Nice monitor pull in gt1!

No.

also just adding apple a10x as well as the gpu would suffice

bump

Also in the future avoid reflow, it's basically snake oil. This guy explains way better than I can

Main thing is if there is a background requirement it needs to show up immediately. I know several people that are benching on ln2 this weekend and would be disappointed if it were worthless for the comps.

Wow! And here I was thinking that on sandy most IMCs would do 2300ish up until too far above 109 bclk. And an ivy imc that can't even do 2000? Although I was having issues on my 3470 imc once I started pushing bclk on the ocf, I need to try again on the mve to see if it's a board issue.

I will be selling a bunch later this month, $15+ship. Even some that do 109+ bclk on ss. Tbh, cold probably doesn't help that much it's more knowing the chip and binning hard. I've even had a chip that would do 108 on ss.

Hi! Recently I've had about 60 of these guys come across my desk at work and I'd like to upload my scores from them. https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6814707