-
Posts
2264 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by yosarianilives
-
Found the tweak for this one. Git gud... at mem. Spent just as long as on cb11.5 with same results, 98, 98, 98. Finally started completely over on mem and changed priorities and got this 1st try. Probably the hardest I've worked for a score, except maybe a few for comps. SS really came in handy here, about an inch of ice around the socket so far.
-
Does anyone have any efficiency tweaks for cinebench to share? I've been rerunning all day and even with a higher oc I can at best match the score of someone with a lower OC so obviously something is messed up with my efficiency. Does anyone have any favorite tips or tweaks that they like to run for the maximum pts in cinebench?
- 8 replies
-
- cinebench
- efficiency
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
While I think that there are too many "lame OCs" on the bot, I also think that deleting all 10% as a one size fits all fix for that isn't the way to go. For example on locked lga 1155 there is a lot of effort just to hit 10% oc, on g470 I had to bin 4 chips, and it definitely is a real OC not like the stereotypical 1151 locked xtu "oc". Binning is important on these cpus, also you're up against the limits of the IMC and questions like "should I run 109.8 bclk but be forced to use a lower mem divider or 109 and use the higher divider?" come up. I think that if such a cutoff were added it would likely be based only on core percentage of OC, which doesn't take into account pushing the crap out of mem or in the case of certain "cpu" benchmarks the gpu. Similarly on gpu there are many benches where cpu is just as important as gpu so you may not push the gpu, or in the case of intel gma, may not even be able to at all push the gpu. In that case it is about cpu and mem OC. However that would show up as a "lame" oc even though it took a lot of effort and was pushed to the max. If something is implemented like this it has to be cpu per cpu basis. For example on i3 6100 less than 2.9% gtfo while on lga 775 less than 10% u suck.
-
If my imc would behave at 2330 mhz+ I could run bclk as high as 109.6 as I do in my 2.51 fps run and do .61 fps. Truemonkey is running on the older version of x265 that scores worse. Plus there are a few tweaks that he's missing as well as georgeOC from the look of it At the very least I'm on my 3rd chip, I still have another to test with 3 more in the mail and a dice pot for the mem coming I'm fairly confident I can set .61 or .62 fps.