yosarianilives

Thanks! If I get any more across my desk perhaps we'll see some ice storm and slingshot results. I found it's geek 4 performance interesting at the very least. Had pretty decent ipc.

Perhaps many are like me where we click so that we don't have a notification for new post.

Perhaps it's a sata driver issue?

And with using the igpu! I thought that most chips don't bclk very well with igpu in use but supposedly that's not always so. Then again from my testing on OCF I thought the IMC was <2000 mhz on this chip and we see that's also not true. Perhaps with dgpu I can go even further though.

Ty, too bad you can't edit more than 5 minutes later...

You lock it to it's max boost using xtu.

So I've been hearing in other forums a bit of confusion what I mean by "most intel igpu should do 1900 mhz". I'm talking i5 8600k ofc. I've seen this every gen, top end i7 clocks igpu best, mid tier cpu second best, and bottom tier has lowest clocks. Now most gens it's not so far, look at sandy for example where my 2600k does 2260 on igp, but my pentium g870 only does 1860. The top mhz for intel igp has gone down a bit each gen. So now on 7700k I'd say top is probably around 2000 mhz for a good chip, however if you go down to i3 you'll find hot garbage. I think the fact that the cpu clocks core and memory generally lower than average 7700k should give a good indication of what to expect. On SS my 7700k can run 5.8/5.6 core/cache with the igp at 1926 mhz with 1.7v and 1.75v respectively. However on same cooling my 7350k does like 5.3/5.1 core/cache at 1.6-1.7v and 1530 mhz igp at 1.6v+ and you can forget 4000 mhz mem. I hope you don't misunderstand me to say that any issue with your core clocks on 7350k was cause you didn't know how to clock igp, I'm more saying that you'll see far more scaling from mem than igp core. For example just testing on the 7350k today I was scoring around 1800 graphics score. Increasing to 1500 mhz boosted me to 2100. However increasing mem to 3930 (best this crap IMC could do) boosted me to over 2500 pts. You can see that if an igp was 100 mhz behind you could easily make it up with more mem, especially in 8600k which has a much better imc. Main takeaway is that 8600k is gonna be nothing like 7350k was, it should be a much better experience and much less hot garbage. Shame I don't have/want z370 cause you're all making me feel like I'd almost be competitive on ss with your attitude towards this stage. Unless intel decided that now i5 get's binned like i3...

If you have a solid 3dm11 physics score and not from bruteforcing cpu core then graphics score will follow. Nearly every intel igpu can do around 1900 mhz even on ss, and unless you get an extra crap igpu you'll be within 100-200 mhz of anyone else. Also I've found very little core scaling from 1600 up to 1900 on hd graphics on 7700k. So it's mainly mem OC on igpu. Tertiary and secondary timings as well as high cpu cache clock are way more import primary timings. Also you have to use the right driver, sometimes as much as 10-30% difference from using best vs worst driver on intel igpu. I see no reason why you would need to bin igpu if you have a good imc. But of course your average hwbot member doesn't want to go outside their comfort zone and learn a new way of OCing so perhaps we should throw it out. Cause new things are evil.

Not gold yet, ddr3 2700 was almost stable. With a little more cold I could've taken the thrown.

Also this isn't win 8 (although this OS would still fall under those rules)

i5 3470 = p3470 :)

RIP

Okay thanks. I'll try that the next time.

Most of the 2d benches like wprime score fine in win 7. It's just superpi that you absolutely have to run in xp for a good score.

It's clearly a glitch that it allowed him to submit while in novice league, perhaps related to the switch to rev 7 and maybe something got messed up in relation to what league he's in. The mods will sort it. However I have found that being a dick to them tends to slow the process down so you might want to try not doing that going forward. You should try posting in the support section down at the bottom of this sub.

Isn't the first time

It could even be something down to maxmem. It's common to run 4 gb maxmem on bdie.

You can't be sure of this unless you have the exact same ram settings. whycruncher hits mem very hard, especially in 1b which uses around 4 gb.

My 9590 didn't need so many volts, it was just leaky as hell. On my aio I was limited to 4.9 ghz@1.37v because it was way too hot to go any more volts. My 8320, binned for low leakage, did 4.8@1.45v on the same aio.

Gotta use a dgpu. The igpu get's OC'd by the base clock as well and will really limit you. For voltages I just max everything since the bios doesn't give anything dangerous. At least for benching.

I've always favored the crosshairs as for a while there you could consistently find them for $50 on fleabay if you watched for a month or two. Although it's been a while since I bought mine so we may be starting to move to a slight board scarcity so prices may not be nearly as good.

Yeah, I've seen this rankings randomly mess up. For example for a bit there pifast lost all points on g470. I also had a superpi 32m score that refused to be worth pts or ranked on i7 2600. I'm not sure what's going on with the backend to cause these type of things, but hopefully they're dialing in on it. At least they have been able to successfully remedy them on a case by case basis.

bump

Hi, I still have x265 1080p score showing as 2nd place globally although it's 1st. http://hwbot.org/submission/3772051_yosarianilives_hwbot_x265_benchmark___1080p_celeron_g470_2.54_fps Also my i7 2600 superpi 32m score isn't receiving rank or pts even after forcing recalculate a few times. I've verified and it should be a valid sub. http://hwbot.org/submission/3802530__yosarianilives_superpi___32m_core_i7_2600_7min_18sec_798ms

Okay, thanks