knopflerbruce

Unlocked CPUs go in the normal category (sempron 140 if that's what the CPU was sold as). However, you should select the amount of active cores - 2 for sempron unlocked to a dual core.

6570, nice cpu speed. And "decent" score too:D

I seem to have found the cause, it happens while using the previous submission option while submitting.

As long as you leave the calculation parameters alone, I think it's fine.

It could have changed with the new core of course, but tbh I'm not sure yet.

Ticket ID: 890 Priority: Low http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K10/AMD-Athlon%20X2%206500%20-%20AD6500WCJ2BGH%20%28AD6500WCGHBOX%29.html\r\n\r\nI\'ll post a CPUZ screenie tomorrow if needed, benching the chip right now.

If there's a performance difference, we do Or not?

Unless the clocks are unreal, we accept "rejected" K10 based CPU validations, as there is some bug with CPUZ and that architecture.

Ticket ID: 888 Priority: Low http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_64_4600_x2_windsor?tab=2drankings#/manufacturer.rankings.do?applicationId=14&manufacturer=amd&hardwareTypeId=CPU_1145&hardwareType=CPU&tabid=cpubenchmarks - here and in the Opteron 1210 category, it seems as if the enhine thinks my scores are multi-socket, when these CPUs only work in single socket boards. I didn\'t change te # of sockets, either.

This submission is a bit of a mess Perhaps its better to delete and reupload?

I haven't got any +0.1 boint updates for a while either, seems like the old bug is getting worse:(

Recalculation bug, it seems.

Seems correct to me:confused:

v4.3 used, result blocked.

Old result, see the superpi score thread for more info (same arguments here i believe).

It's more than 3 years old, back then the rules were very different. Plus, the score doesn't really look weird, sub-31s is definately possible on these chips (but maybe no that easy on air/water, though).

Massman or richbastard must do this I think,.

Can't you find all of these entries by a search?

Hmmm, maybe the next global boint calculation will take care of it. If not, Massman or Rich must take a look at it I think.

This is indeed a bug, but it will go away as soon as one of the two similar submissions lose (or gain) 0.1 boint.

Try to set CL to 6 and 7 and see if you see any performance differences, if you do I'm sure it's real:D

For some models I have alot of duplicates Plus, there's a TON of chips I haven't benched yet, because of mobo issues. Maybe I'll run my server chips on an old SATA at some point, I don't need SSDs in raid 0 for those cups I think:) Plus, Acards aren't cheap, I have $1000 pr month, and that includes rent, food, subway ticket etc... I don't have more than $2-300 to spend on HW every month... sucks big time:( But when I start working it won't take too many months before I start benching newer stuff, and then there's a good chance I'll get an Acard + SSDs:D

I agree with everything, except the first "don't". It's perfectly possible to create a successful competition with a "weird" benchmark, we showed that during the wprime singlecore competition:) But of course you won't get the low numbers you get with 6-core rigs etc.

Using a public forum is like announcing through the PA system during a soccer game. If you feel that's "face to face", then OK. I just say... keep it civil. Just saying this BEFORE this thing turns into flaming.

If immatureness is a reason for banning, we'd need to recruit more mods... based on what I read in different forums every now and then. PS: just to make a statement before this thread is filled with anti-hicookie junk posts while people wait for our decision: drop him a PM instead of posting it here.