knopflerbruce

As long as you leave the calculation parameters alone, I think it's fine.

It could have changed with the new core of course, but tbh I'm not sure yet.

Ticket ID: 890 Priority: Low http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K10/AMD-Athlon%20X2%206500%20-%20AD6500WCJ2BGH%20%28AD6500WCGHBOX%29.html\r\n\r\nI\'ll post a CPUZ screenie tomorrow if needed, benching the chip right now.

If there's a performance difference, we do Or not?

Unless the clocks are unreal, we accept "rejected" K10 based CPU validations, as there is some bug with CPUZ and that architecture.

Ticket ID: 888 Priority: Low http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_64_4600_x2_windsor?tab=2drankings#/manufacturer.rankings.do?applicationId=14&manufacturer=amd&hardwareTypeId=CPU_1145&hardwareType=CPU&tabid=cpubenchmarks - here and in the Opteron 1210 category, it seems as if the enhine thinks my scores are multi-socket, when these CPUs only work in single socket boards. I didn\'t change te # of sockets, either.

This submission is a bit of a mess Perhaps its better to delete and reupload?

I haven't got any +0.1 boint updates for a while either, seems like the old bug is getting worse:(

Recalculation bug, it seems.

Seems correct to me:confused:

v4.3 used, result blocked.

Old result, see the superpi score thread for more info (same arguments here i believe).

It's more than 3 years old, back then the rules were very different. Plus, the score doesn't really look weird, sub-31s is definately possible on these chips (but maybe no that easy on air/water, though).

Massman or richbastard must do this I think,.

Can't you find all of these entries by a search?

Hmmm, maybe the next global boint calculation will take care of it. If not, Massman or Rich must take a look at it I think.

This is indeed a bug, but it will go away as soon as one of the two similar submissions lose (or gain) 0.1 boint.

Try to set CL to 6 and 7 and see if you see any performance differences, if you do I'm sure it's real:D

For some models I have alot of duplicates Plus, there's a TON of chips I haven't benched yet, because of mobo issues. Maybe I'll run my server chips on an old SATA at some point, I don't need SSDs in raid 0 for those cups I think:) Plus, Acards aren't cheap, I have $1000 pr month, and that includes rent, food, subway ticket etc... I don't have more than $2-300 to spend on HW every month... sucks big time:( But when I start working it won't take too many months before I start benching newer stuff, and then there's a good chance I'll get an Acard + SSDs:D

I agree with everything, except the first "don't". It's perfectly possible to create a successful competition with a "weird" benchmark, we showed that during the wprime singlecore competition:) But of course you won't get the low numbers you get with 6-core rigs etc.

Using a public forum is like announcing through the PA system during a soccer game. If you feel that's "face to face", then OK. I just say... keep it civil. Just saying this BEFORE this thing turns into flaming.

If immatureness is a reason for banning, we'd need to recruit more mods... based on what I read in different forums every now and then. PS: just to make a statement before this thread is filled with anti-hicookie junk posts while people wait for our decision: drop him a PM instead of posting it here.

So... basically we have to find someone who can bench "high enough" to be able to tell if Hicookie is innocent? That's BS. What motivation does Hicookie have to create multiple accounts in this case? I think people should start thinking a bit more, and stop spreading gossip like little girls.

I typed the superpi time by mistake I'll repost it straight away!

Looks like this particular one will get fixed, need to rebench now anyway Now I wonder if I have any cups left when I wake up in the morning...