Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Splave

Members
  • Posts

    5901
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    131

Everything posted by Splave

  1. Yeah and then we killed the Imc and then we killed it completely lol tis the way it goes with ivy
  2. Romdominance if is old ass is still alive by September
  3. Meant to try them but never for a chance to go back and play around too busy.
  4. its only 205k in 3d03 I fill it all out, and says it needs the link...even using a fake one didnt work lol
  5. Even if not in the top 20 HOF is the link required? Its not allowing me to submit it without one so I am assuming its required but wanted to double check....
  6. pretty please http://hwbot.org/submission/2295994_splave_aquamark_radeon_hd_7970_529812_marks/
  7. lol you have to admit that that was quite the explosion
  8. I thought giorgio was an amazing judge but I think he is someones partner this year
  9. 3219B383 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2413797 6.785mhz max 1m/pf 6.74ghz @ 1.96v
  10. seems like there will always be bad chips in a good batch imo
  11. core01 weak 6.57 maximum in OS with 2c2t and it max 1m on core01 is 6.4ghz lmao core00 max 6.67 1m but mount wasnt great will try again.
  12. your prayers seem to have worked 3218B969 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2413470 looks promising will test ln2 in 2 hours
  13. ^ True I have tested with same conclusion for moa Americas Tight timings better than frequency and 1.0.1 version give boost without any changes. 2400 10-12-10 (GTX8 Hynix) 1866 8-8-8 (dominator GT Hyper) 700 points faster in physx (2.25FPS) here is 5.0ghz 8-11-9 2400mhz for 17.2k http://hwbot.org/submission/2281489_splave_3dmark11___performance_radeon_hd_7970_14925_marks so tighter timings and 100mhz more cpu clock is totally achievable 17.6k
×
×
  • Create New...