Strunkenbold

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/g513qy/

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ultra20_m2/

We might want to wait till official benchmarks appear. If 12900k is barely faster than any 8 core we might should consider a change. But I could imagine that architectural changes will make the gap you might see today disappear with next gen anyway. And in 1-2 years hybrid categories might be superfluous. But if the leaks are true, there is nothing to worry about, except you know already more...

This got already added yesterday by some really kind person (not me): https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/snapdragon_439/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/adreno_505/

Do you have the wrong bios on this board? There is the T810B-CU and Instant 810C-SE as well. Added both but please only submit in one category: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/instant_810c_se/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/t810b_cu/

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tech_t3_mrd/

I think those were just erroneously listed as dedicated as other Tiger Lake GPUs were integrated too.

https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/grid_k1/

Probably it just got flashed with a Vega 64 bios. Thats one of the reason why a screenshot with GPU-Z is still required (and which is missing here)

https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/rtx_a4000/

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/25002lg/

Added and fixed your sub.

Do you have a link to the specs page or screenshot from a tool in windows showing your disk? We already have the Phison E18 as a controller in our db. B47R seems to be the used Nand chips, so whats the name of your disk?

https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/helio_p22/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/rogue_ge8320/

https://hwbot.org/hardware/diskproduct/870_evo/

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ak37gt/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ak37gtr/ Has your board a KT400A?

You realize that we dont have all available hardware on this planet in our database? If something is not there, plz make a request in the support section instead of simply submitting. Added your disk and changed your result ?

someone already added this yesterday but didnt post this here: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/dopey_il/

Shouldnt it be available on your profile page on 3dmark.com?

https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/helio_g80_mt6769t/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/mali_g52_mc2/

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/cs62_tc/

I had the exactly the same error and in case its still interesting to some one: the cause seems to be the opencl.dll in GPUPI folder. Simply delete it.

Now you only need 2 x CPU-Z for a valid score: Benchmark window, rendered scene & BenchMate score (BM) CPUZ tab for CPU and memory (V1.94+) Windows taskbar must be visible No screenshot clipping or cropping

Old MSI boards are a mess. We have now the following categories with MS-7125 in our db: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/k8n_neo4h_ms_7125/ <-- neo4h printed on pcb but seems to be the F with newer revision, does not officially exist and should get merged with the F https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/k8n_neo4_f_ms_7125/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/k8n_neo4_fi_ms_7125/ <-- this comes with the ultra right away https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/k8n_neo4_ms_7125/<-- just added, stunnies OEM board https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/k8n_neo4_platinum_ms_7125/ I was looking a bit on old MSI page via webarchive and it turns out that PCB 3.0 of the Neo4-F has indeed the nforce 4 Ultra on it while PCB 1.0 just has the nforce 4. The mainboard tab of CPU-Z actually shows 1.0 and 3.0 but its not visible on the verification page. Now the difference between ultra or not is SATA2. CPU-Z doesnt show any difference. All boards are more or less the same. So I'm in favor of merging the F with FI and the plain Neo4 to a category like K8N Neo4(-F/-FI) (MS-7125). Opinions?