Strunkenbold

This is just the latest P170HM stock bios flashed over my 150hm. I know there exists a mod bios with unlocked power management but I still didnt obtained it...

All correct, just GMA 3600's chip should be SGX545 instead of SGX535. Thx for looking through all of these, doesnt it look pretty now?

same here: http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=85433

worked, really great software btw...

Same here, still only got 2.50.105 from download...

This should be perfectly correct. You ever wondered why you dont loose points in the last 100 days where you committed last? http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=85433

Ticket ID: 1814 Priority: Low yeah yeah yet another one \r\nI just give you the full list of Intel GMA here, didnt made changes to all (but most) \r\n\r\n[combine]\r\n82852 Integrated Graphics 1x Montara \r\nand 82855 Integrated Graphics 1x 855GME \r\nto: 82852/82855 Integrated Graphics 1x Montara \r\n\r\nGMA X3100 (GL960, GLE960) 1x GMA X3100 \r\nand GMA X3100 (GM965, GME965) 1x GMA X3100 \r\nto: GMA X3100 (GM965, GME965, GL960, GLE960) 1x Crestline\r\nReasons for this is that GPU-Z cant distinguish between those and apart from that, these shouldnt have an extra category anyway because they are just different chipsets featuring the same gpu. \r\n\r\n[rename]\r\nname, core\r\n82810 Integrated Graphics, 1x Whitney \r\n82815 Integrated Graphics, 1x Solano \r\n82830 Integrated Graphics, 1x Almador \r\n82845G Integrated Graphics, 1x Brookdale \r\n82852/82855 Integrated Graphics, 1x Montara \r\nmerged \r\nGMA 900 (915G), 1x Grantsdale \r\nGMA 950 (945G), 1x Lakeport \r\nGMA 950 Mobile (945GME, 945GSE), 1x Calistoga \r\nGMA 3000 (946GZ, Q963, Q965), 1x Broadwater\r\nGMA 3100 (G31, G33, Q35, Q33), 1x Bearlake \r\nGMA 3150, 1x Pineview \r\nGMA 4500 (B43, Q43, Q45), 1x Eaglelake \r\nGMA 4500M (GL40, GS40), 1x Cantiga \r\nGMA 4500MHD (GM45, GS45), 1x Cantiga \r\nGMA 500 (UL11L, US15L, US15W), 1x SGX535 \r\n82865G Integrated Graphics, 1x Springfield \r\nGMA 900 Mobile (915GM), 1x Alviso\r\nGMA 950 Mobile (945GM), 1x Calistoga\r\nGMA 3600, 1x SGX545 \r\nGMA X3000 (G965), 1x Broadwater\r\nmerged \r\nGMA X3100 (GM965, GME965, GL960, GLE960), 1x Crestline\r\nGMA X3500 (G35), 1x Bearlake\r\nGMA X4500 (G43, G41), 1x Eaglelake \r\nGMA X4500HD (G45), 1x Eaglelake \r\ni740, 1x Auburn\r\n\r\nI can give u a file if that would be easier for you.

Any reason this is still here? Its obviously not a PCI card.

what about reporting bugs to cpu-z?

While we are at this, one more proposal to combine two categorys: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/82852_integrated_graphics/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/82855_integrated_graphics/ Again, no way to see differences with GPU-Z. Also this shouldn't be separated anyway, as we have here simply the same graphic part in just different chipsets. Turrican, do you want a new ticket for this?

I vote for keep the memory diversity with old cards! Does really somebody go shopping to find the best card? Im always happy that some of them simply fall in my hands... Its like yesterday, and this is really coincidence, got a pc from a friend for repair and his graphic card is what? Nvidia 6800GS! Couldnt help myself taking of cooler to see the GPU. But things remain mystery. Basically, same description like this. They self talk in their article about 110nm which would be NV42. But GPU-Z says 6800GS is NV41 so 130nm. But really I think NV42 should be right, atleast this would make sense. Die shrink could be the reason for those higher clocks. I smell a GPU-Z bug... Another article But what we really should do anyway is merging these NV41 and NV42 category's.

Isnt that a GPU-Z bug when they dont match your device id with the correct device name? Maybe contacting author of GPU-Z is worth a try...

Again a very good example what happens when _almost_ two identical devices share the same device id. Rivatuner says NV42, GPU-Z NV41. And no one can verify. Still, apart from what wikipedia says, do merge these ones.

thx! Might need to do a voltmod for the rams.

yeah for sure, especially because GPU-Z changed naming during versions. But it has to fight with the same issues like we- one device id for two devices, or multiple ids for one device. No clear product name or multiple names and just one device... Still, I dont think that we couldnt handle this. Maybe we should consider that users can make their entry based on deviceID...

Well we made some progress here, the Database is now in a very good shape. Also it seems that Turrican accepted to add the mobile counterparts. There are still some models missing, so if you have a GPU-Z validation feel free to open a ticket in the HelpCenter. Also, everyone is free to move their submissions to the correct category by editing your result by her/him own. If you cant to do this because i.e. its a competition entry than you should report your own submission so that a mod can do this for you. I think were on a good way now next step is to fix some bugs in GPU-Z...

aaaaargh Something went wrong, Mobile HD Graphics 4000 should be added, so better rename it back to HD Graphics 4000 and add a new category for Mobile HD Graphics 4000. Maybe you could be so kind and move the sub I linked earlier to this new category. Also Mobile HD 4600 (GT2 Haswell) should be Mobile HD Graphics 4600. And HD Graphics P3000's core should be GT2 Sandy Bridge not GT1, thx again!

Ticket ID: 1805 Priority: Low Oh no not again \r\n\r\n[rename]\r\nname, core\r\nHD Graphics 2000, GT1 Sandy Bridge\r\nHD Graphics 2500, GT1 Ivy Bridge\r\nHD Graphics 3000, GT2 Sandy Bridge\r\nHD Graphics 4000, GT2 Ivy Bridge\r\nHD Graphics P3000, GT1 Sandy Bridge\r\nHD Graphics 4600, GT2 Haswell\r\nHD Graphics (Haswell), GT1 Haswell\r\nHD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), GT1 Ivy Bridge\r\nHD Graphics P4600, GT2 Haswell\r\nIris Pro 5200 Graphics, GT3e Crystal Well\r\nMobile HD 4600, GT2 Haswell\r\nMobile HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), GT1 Sandy Bridge\r\nMobile HD Graphics 4200, GT2 Haswell\r\nMobile HD Graphics 4400, GT2 Haswell\r\nMobile HD Graphics 5000, GT2 Haswell\r\nMobile Iris Pro 5100 Graphics, GT3 Haswell\r\nMobile Iris Pro 5200 Graphics, GT3e Crystal Well\r\n\r\nThe information in the braces should be only there to distinguish between identically named hardware. Else we make names way too long and everything gets hard to read.\r\n\r\n[add]\r\nMobile HD Graphics 4000, GT2 Ivy Bridge\r\nLink to GPU-Z

Seems to me that all results of wprime and ucbench are still flagged as 4 core. http://www.hwbot.org/benchmark/ucbench_2011/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2378#start=0#interval=20#cores=4

thx so far, just something left: Could you change the core count of 2620M to 2? Again source hope we're done now with those cpu's ^^

Ticket ID: 1801 Priority: Medium Thought it would be good to fix our db before country cup starts, could be have impact in the superpi32m stage. \r\n\r\n[Move from 1155 to 988B]\r\nCore i5 3210M\r\nCore i5 3230M\r\nCore i5 3320M\r\nCore i5 3340M\r\nCore i5 3360M\r\nCore i7 2620QM\r\nCore i7 2630QM\r\nCore i7 2635QM\r\nCore i7 2640M\r\nCore i7 2670QM\r\n\r\n[rename]\r\nit seems that everybody entered the wrong category, thus it would be better to simply rename 2620qm to 2620m instead of moving everything one by one\r\n\r\n[add]\r\nIntel® Core™ i7-2620M Processor\r\n(4M Cache, up to 3.40 GHz)\r\nIntel® Core™ i7-2675QM Processor\r\n(6M Cache, up to 3.10 GHz)\r\nIntel® Core™ i7-2629M Processor\r\n(4M Cache, up to 3.00 GHz)\r\nIntel® Core™ i7-2649M Processor\r\n(4M Cache, up to 3.20 GHz)\r\nIntel® Core™ i7-2657M Processor\r\n(4M Cache, up to 2.70 GHz)\r\nIntel® Core™ i7-2617M Processor\r\n(4M Cache, up to 2.60 GHz)\r\nIntel® Core™ i7-2655LE Processor\r\n(4M Cache, up to 2.90 GHz)\r\nIntel® Core™ i7-2610UE Processor\r\n(4M Cache, up to 2.40 GHz)\r\n\r\nsource\r\n\r\nIntel® Core™ i7-2710QE Processor\r\n(6M Cache, up to 3.00 GHz)\r\nIntel® Core™ i7-2715QE Processor\r\n(6M Cache, up to 3.00 GHz)\r\nsource

1611.3 fps GT2? Seems to be bugged. Oh wait its Futuremark approved so its valid.

Can confirm here, had to do a reinstall of Win7 and XTU worked simply while I was connected to the internet.

Actually not, it should get its own directory. This is already confirmed, its just that Turrican doesnt feel like to finally add my list to the db.

Dont know if this helps but it seems it has something to do with wmi. When the wmi service is disabled, result window does appear. Ofcourse I get lot of errors and I probably cant submit but still...