Leeghoofd

ASRock: ASrock Timing Configurator for Z690 ASrock Xp Tuner Z690 Aqua OC 1.63NK11 Z690 Aqua OC 1.63NK18 (easier DDR5 OC) ... Z690 Aqua OC 4.05 Z690 Aqua OC 4.05C10 --> non K OC Z690 Aqua OC 5.05NK07 Z690 Aqua OC 5.05NK08 Z690 Aqua OC 5.05NK09 ASUS: Worktool ADL 1106 Worktool ADL 1121 TurboV Core 1.10.19 MemTweakIt ROG True Voltician 1021 Legacy Tools WinXP Ratio Tool 590 ACPI Files (work on Z690) (credits go out to OGS) BIOS (thx to Noizemaker/Safedisk) APEX 0096 - 0072 (non K OC) - 0080 - 0086 - 0090 - 1101(SLI) - 1304 (AVX enabled) - 1505 (AVX enabled) - 1701 STRIX-Z690-A Gaming-Wifi-D4 0006 APEX 0702 - 0802 - 0803 - 0811 - Beta 1302 FORMULA 0702 - 0802 - 0803 - 0811 - Beta 1302 HERO 0702 - 0802 - 0803 - 0811 - Beta 1302 EXTREME 0702 - 0802 - 0803 - 0811 - Beta 1302 STRIX-Z690-A Gaming-Wifi - Beta 1302 STRIX-Z690-A Gaming-Wifi-D4 0803 - Beta 1301 - 1504 (AVX enabled) - 1601 STRIX-Z690-E Gaming-Wifi - Beta 1302 STRIX-Z690-F Gaming-Wifi - Beta 1302 STRIX-Z690-G Gaming-Wifi - Beta 1302 TUF Gaming Z690-Plus D4 0803 ASUS STRIX B660 G gaming wifi (bios: 1003) --> Non K OC ASUS STRIX B660 F gaming wifi (bios: 1003) -->Non K OC eVGA: Z690 DARK KINGPIN: Bios 1.04 Z690 DARK KINGPIN XOC Bios: 20225T0 ELEET 1.0.9.11 Gigabyte: Z690 Tachyon X2D bios Z690Tachyon X2G bios Z690 Tachyon X3C bios (GTL Fix) Z690 Tachyon X3i bios Latest GTL-Tool MSI: MEG Z690 Unify-X XA21 MSI Z690 Unify-X Non K OC bios ( bioses: A22TC, A22TH (C for C0 stepping, H for H0 stepping) ) MSI Dragonball 1.0.012 Z690-AQUA-OC_1_63.NK11.rar Z690-AQUA-OC_1_63.NK18.rar NON K Biosses can also be found in this thread

2122657988_MSIDragonPower1.0.0.6-intel.zip 615721026_MSIDragonBall1.0.0.08.zip

Lo

Deleted sir

All deleted, but HWBOT moderators require to see the entire desktop including the taskbar for verification purposes. If you have somehting to hide, plz cover it with one of the CPUZ or other tabs. Also ensure you have 2 instances of CPUZ open for 2D and add GPUZ for 3D scores like the below screenshot:

solid stuff, no 12700K love anyone ?

Tim uploaded his early wrappers to the uat.hwbot.org test site. Normally this site is like way slower than the daily one, really feels more responsive. Take note: The site is not getting new submissions, so the front page is empty till you submit something on uat. A lot of work still has to be done and the point calculation has not been touched yet. Also images do not load on the uat version Some feedback I already provided on some of the new pages:

No pun intended David, but if the benchmark executes multiple tasks at the same time and your CPU can't do these, I guess the storage is not the limiting factor but your CPU might be.

I just ran the latest Storage Benchmark from Ul benchmarks and found the information displayed a bit scarce versus other outputs of the 3DMark series. Take eg no temperature output of the tested Storage device ( this could be an ideal indication if throttling occured and/or beter cooling is required No detailed overview of the storage performance on any the 7 test runs, this could also show if any cache or other software is installed to boost the score. ....

it has been added, contains 3 loops of 7 tests, first one is very slow, loop 2 and 3 are way faster, though will take up 15-25 minutes of your time, even on fast storage...

Thanks Tobias

Plz re-run and provide a screenshot like this one plz:

This is something Roman is working on for competitions, the one that holds the top score for a specific period will get rewarded with extra points.

Roman has an idea for competitions on this one Allen, but one step at a time. If you check the front page and actually read it, you can see we only got access to the code end of last year, thanks to the ultra slow paperwork and the Covid shitshow... Didn't we mention numerous times already that 2021 would be a transition year as the programmer can only work during the weekends on the code... I think Tim sorted already tons of broken code, removed deadlocks, enabling most broken features and recoded them to work better than before. The Bot was a limping neglected beast and is now more stable than it was the last 3-5 years. You are probably the expert in coding and could have sorted it all within a few weeks, too bad for all of us we made this paramount mistake of not hiring you. I also know a few that would start a new OC Dbase from scratch, haven't seen much of that either the last decade. Mat can and probably will do a version with BM. It seems clear to me you only listen to those voices in your head, lighten up and exorcise them demons. Eventually it might even make you smile....

fixed

We can go many directions with this: Max 75 hardware points for hardware with over 100 submissions, max 50 sub 100, less than than 50 submissions : 25 points. It all depends how the programmer can program things

it is my initial proposal and was the easiest to explain to the programmer, but we can shift it to maybe at least 75 submissions is maximum 50 HW points. Less then 75 is 25 HW points,.... Yes all benches will probably be treated in the same way, it will be win some, loose some boints. I can just propose, how Tim has to program this, I have no clue...

Max 50 hardware points for hardware with over 100 submissions, max 25 sub 100. Does that sound feasible ? Maybe we can add a 3rd less than than 50 submissions : 15 points That's the big question. Tim has not touched any algorithm or such , he's designing a new front end, call it a wrapper that only requires the ranking from the current old version and will apply the new point algorithm. Front page is already done, now he's looking into the different categories. Its not easy for him to understand as it mostly does not seem logic to him regarding the things we need to have displayed yes or no. If he shows it someday on his local system I'll try to take to some screenies We hope to have it done in Q1

@GTI-R Maybe some nice news for you at Techspot

Just an update on what we have in mind for the points ( Hardware and Global ones ) Maximum of 150 Globals no matter how popular the hardware is. If we have less than 100 subs, maximum will be 100 Globals, for less than 50 submissions maximum will be 50... Less bigger jumps between the top 5 (10-5-3-2) --> some will not like this for sure. Dumping the complex algorithms, the idea is to have fixed designated points for each spot. Points no longer depending on how fast the nr 1 score is. Dumping the 70% cutoff. From spot 21 each position will go down with 0.2-0.3 points. Minimum points will be locked at 2 points. Hardware points difference will be less drastic as you can see, but we try to establish the same idea that each position corresponds with fixed points. Goal is to make the point system more rewarding for a bigger amount of benchers. Lesser calculations are required by the database, thus resulting in a faster HWBot and becoming less error prone.

You can bench on 11, but if your score goes out of bounce versus other scores, we would like to be informed asap. It might be BM wil become a standard if we see many bugged scores on 11

I'll play that one smart and let Roman do the announcement ?

Nice one!!

I think you only need a more performant storage device Richard

Nice hardware pron