Leeghoofd

Yes, fine-tuning of the verification rules will be done later this week

lets say that is a rare price point too ? , anyway 780 can handle way higher memory clocks too on Intel like 1200C5... In the beginning there was far less chipset choices, but on request I added a few more. just pick as a team the board(s) you need/want/require

I can find 570/590/650i/750a/750i/780a boards in BE/NL/GER for under 35/40USD on local 2nd hand markets Shane. This is the reason i avoided 680/ 780 chipset for Intel as they are far more expensive as you found out Some requested an nforce stage, they got one...

Yep that's the catch there Frank

you got PM sir

there's no update for this benchmark, so yep you have to do it manually

It should be addressed in the future... For the time being bench entirely for fun...

Stop using XTU on it before you kill it

I'll check tonite what is going on

Will check it out. Probably a double submission in the ranking somewhere

We took Coflu into account, hence why there are (mostly) only 2 scores required Ozzie. All stuff is sort of final. Only minor changes might still occur over the last days (depending on the input of the loophole specialists) Rules need to be tuned, hardware in 95% no more drastic changes. We can always opt to add another 2 weeks if required... But that needs to be decided before we start it

Bots Database is weird, I have GF106, 106', 106'', plus GF116 and GF116' in here. Maybe better idea to limit it to just Geforce400 series? Wantd to have GTS450 in there as we wil be using it for Cheapaz too soon Added 590 and 750 chipset

4303Mhz surpassed

wrong fm link

4002 mhz, 3903 max allowed

nice downclock, removed from compo, .... planned or unplanned ?

time to grab all them cups bro, enjoy!!

Scotty a 91K on GPU score, you can't even get that with eg a GTX285@900 and Shrimp gets it on a semi stock card with an inferior architecture... and his CPU score is the total opposite of what you claim it to be. C4 and C5 are clearly out of whack

added the link sir

It's not about performance, clock checks are primordial here...

nope changed to Allendale , lots of hardware points up for grasps

current standings: 3dmark06: DDR: socket 939 limitation DDR2: 2 processor cores and 2 GPU cores (GPU core G80-92) DDR3: 3 processor cores and 3 GPU cores DDR4: 4 procssor cores and 4 GPU cores (nVIDIA only) 3dmark99: DDR: AMD CPU and AGP4x/8x DDR2: 2 processor cores, GF 106-116(') cores, Mobos based on nForce chipset DDR3: LGA775 4 cores, 1 video core Unigine Basic: DDR: Socket A platform and nVidia videocard DDR2: 1 CPU core and 2 GPUs in SLI/crossfire DDR3: 2 CPU cores, Geforce 400 family DDR4: AMD APUs only 3DMark03: DDR: socket 478, AGP4x/8x DDR2: 1 CPU core, ATI HD 4000 family DDR3: 6 core CPUs, Geforce 500 family DDR4: CGN 5tgh gen (Vega) 3DMash-up: DDR: Aquamark3: Geforce2 family DDR2: Vantage (GPU score) : ATI HD 2000 DDR3: FireStrike (GPU score) : Intel IGP DDR4: Unigine SuperPosition 8K X265 1080P: DDR: Socket 478 DDR2: Conroe& Woodcrest 4M cpus DDR3: 4cores LGA 1366 DDR4: AM4 only MemFreq: DDR: no socket 939 -- 1024Mb -- Cas 3 DDR2: no socket 771-775 -- 2048Mb -- Cas 5 DDR3: AM3/AM3+ -- 8192Mb -- Cas 10 DDR4: 16348Mb -- Cas 15 SuperPi 32M: DDR: Socket 754 -- 8 multi max DDR2: Quad cores -- 8 multi max DDR3: Zambezi core -- 10 multi max (benchmate) DDR4: no LGA 1200 -- 12 multi max (benchmate) Cinebench 2003: (notebooks & notebook parts only, no desktop CPUs!! GPUPI 3.2 for CPU: DDR: 100M DDR2: 100M -- Allendale 2M DDR3: 1B -- AMD DDR4: 1B Wprime 1024: DDR: Duron processors DDR2: AM2 processors DDR3: Clarkdale processors DDR4: AM4 (benchmate)

Better make the coding rock solid, as many will challenge your programming skills, looking forward to it

suggestions are welcome Diggy

Added all b550 besides asrock ones