-
Posts
13447 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
710
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Leeghoofd
-
davestarrr - Core i9 10900K @ 6800MHz - 3746 cb Cinebench - R15
Leeghoofd replied to chispy's topic in Result Discussions
picture of the setup for the 5.5 run? can you make a vid with realtemp in it too ? -
The official Cheapaz Chips Round 1 HD5770 thread.
Leeghoofd replied to marco.is.not.80's topic in HWBOT Competitions
thx for the nice words, but time to get them GTS 450's ready all for Round2 -
The official Cheapaz Chips Round 1 APU AMD 3000G thread.
Leeghoofd replied to julienricqrt's topic in HWBOT Competitions
K closed, moderation this evening Thx all for participating, was intense!!!! -
The official Cheapaz Chips Round 1 HD5770 thread.
Leeghoofd replied to marco.is.not.80's topic in HWBOT Competitions
K closed, moderation this evening Thx all for participating, was intense!!!! -
added
-
added
-
davestarrr - Core i9 10900K @ 6800MHz - 3746 cb Cinebench - R15
Leeghoofd replied to chispy's topic in Result Discussions
thx for the info 5.4 CBR15 is quite wow -
davestarrr - Core i9 10900K @ 6800MHz - 3746 cb Cinebench - R15
Leeghoofd replied to chispy's topic in Result Discussions
cool, but we want to know more info: Batch, VID, 5Ghz all 10900Ks can do that easy, 5.2ish that is when it starts Batch -- 5.2Ghz @ .... Vcore -- -- LN2 result CBR15 eg LXB00007 - 5.2Ghz @ 1.2Vcore -- 5.43Ghz 1.35 ( too hot) -- 6800Mhz 1.65 CBR15 Somebody has to kick it off, seems you are the chosen one ? -
davestarrr - Core i9 10900K @ 6800MHz - 3746 cb Cinebench - R15
Leeghoofd replied to chispy's topic in Result Discussions
already a nice retail to start of with. as above, could you share some data in the Comet Lake Batch thread plz -
on this specific case it was just a confirmation on which parts were modified by the banned user. The suspicion arose when the new subbed score was the same and the screenshot almost identical than the original one. Fotoforensics is not standard routine nor decisive
-
- 20 replies
-
- 10
-
-
-
Short story 2nd time this month we experience lousy photoshopping. This member got reported numerous times for not respecting the new 2020 rules, meaning cpuz 1.91 version or newer, no clipping, etc.... On top of that his reputation did not help and many were watching his every move. I moderated all the reported scores yesterday , to my big surprise to see some of them popping up today with guess what: Added taskbar, CPUZ version visible and reworked GPUZ.... I admit though a few scores were neatly (re)done, too bad for him many had flaws that even my kid detected. Though I asked one respected member to pull one screenie through his photoshop to have 200% confirmation that the verification screenshot was messed with. The original remastered: (obvious better font in the 3rd CPUZ and top GPUZ) The photshop analysis: light pink means added to the existing screenshot Now I don't get it as he has the save file and could have redone the scores/screenshots as he's on chilled water. Yet he got sloppy while remastering the originals... Well it was fun having you around, but it is time to say goodbye..
- 20 replies
-
- 22
-
-
-
-
or old peeps like me without glasses :p, changed
-
-
My sub of CB20 is not available
Leeghoofd replied to AvengedRobix's topic in Submission & member moderation
link ? -
All my subs marked as "Engineering sample or unreleased hardware"
Leeghoofd replied to Papa_Trickster's topic in Support
we fear it is an Intel XTU issue sadly, plz contact Intel for a fix. We are hopefully starting soon with XTU 2.0 with proper detection and more stable output -
thank you for hosting bro!!!
-
Hicookie - DDR4 SDRAM @ 2500MHz - 3226.9 MHz Memory Frequency
Leeghoofd replied to shar00750's topic in Result Discussions
great score