Leeghoofd

yes sorry , for the old legacy patforms we also impose a GPU limitation, community opted to go for maximum a GTX770 for nVIDIA users

yes correct

Plz monitor CPU speeds and temp via HWinfo, for the GPU temps you can eitehr also monitor via HWinfo or open a 2nd GPU-Z and click the sensor tab

Either you play by the rules of the house like all the guest do or you don't play.... Your call All the above stated is required to be visible in the screenshot, simple as that. Here are the standard rules: https://hwbot.org/news/884_application_12_rules/

CPUZ- 1.91 needs to be used ( dates from last year ) 3DMark06 the benchmark settings need to be visible ( in your case hidden behind your score ) 3Dmark06 Subtests need also to be shown ( press details button on the score of 3D06 and they should pop up)

you are almost here, hang in there, afterwards no more mistakes (unless you are as old as I am :p) for standard submits, foloow the rules on the frontpage for compeition submissions: we impose a background ( otherwise users will just resubmit wiht old competitive scores) and add CPUZ motherboard tab. Sometimes temperature readouts are required as well .

submit using competition background ( https://i.postimg.cc/C5xspR3v/Intel-Overclocking-Lab.jpg )

its just a bugged score, one of the reasons we don't use it anymore, these scores are everywhere , totally out of whack. Alsothey released a newer version which boosted scores over 20% , totally shredding up the existing ranking... no no no

in the buglist fellas, can't do more, at the moment it's a coding problem

thx DaQuteness for the background!!!

yeah the air test seems okay, this should be at least 6+Ghz CB.... don't waste it on delid, just my 2 cents

Try it on cold first without delid... Do your scores first. We have seen many delided ones go down... Not sure anymore if the gain was important enough to risk a decent CPU

XTU competitive usage at HWBOT has been stopped a while ago due to the fact it is far from stable, newer versions gave way higher output messing up the rankings and last but not least it still can be seriously bugged in output (intentionally or not). Look at this score for instance: https://hwbot.org/submission/4385444_autolochus_xtu_core_i9_9900kf_39631_marks Lately we here that people are running into hardware detection problems (stating they have ES hardware), the output datafile is sometimes no longer compatible with HWBot, ... HWBot has a new owner and once the paperwork is completed we will discus if this bench still has a future here.

K I forwarded this to our FL/UL contact Pasi. Like stated in Angelo's thread, other user pls chime in and provide more info than it just won't run. We need to know what you have tried to fix it. Which setup you are running, OS, drivers,...

I have forwarded this link to our Futuremark/UL contact. Other users with issues chime in, but tell us also what you have tried to fix it, the setup and OS you are running,....

someone's jealous and nope it is not a TapaBeer edition ?

If you have any speciific question you can contact me, Bilko or Georgestorm. Anyway quick update on the site for you: subbing for other benchmarks via the XTU profile will be disabled in the future: it gives not accurate info and user tend to forget HWBot requires a verification screenshot in 99% of the cases ( like Splave showed you ) Before you go into benching or comparing scores with other users always check out the rules at the frontpage. Click on Benchmarks, choose CPU, GPU or memory benchmarks, select the rules of the benchmark you want to run...

I'll add the other screenie with slow mode disabled when I'm back home. To be honest I'm very leanient on the MHz as long as the user reports the correct frequency in the submission we can check if the score matches the listed speeds. Ofcourse what we want to avoid is in the LLC compos where people start to downclock to raise efficiency. I hope CPUZ 1.92 will put indeed a lighter load on the setup for verification purposes ?

Thx to Giggles for the hunt for them good scaling batches, 6.1 CB R15 is indeed easily doable. During pretest however the CPU didn't look super as it couldn't run 5Ghz at 1.25ish volts for SuperPI32M. I will check for more later

This would look so nice on my chimney True sport!! kuddos for the community support!!

- crossfire will replace with GPU or card - a lot of beta benchmarks will be skipped and some will become bointless

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/z390_phantom_gaming_x/

some test benchmark that many noticed ?

ha now I understand ? congratz,

lo Marco, plz continue further in english plz. Can you give us the motherboard that you are using plz. in fact it will be very simple to clock your CPU higher than stock, though 5GHz is not alway possible on each CPU. A lot will depend on the silicon quality of your CPU and the cooling you have. Moved your thread to the general Intel Overclocking Thread