TaPaKaH

nice VGA sample

what the hell you need 240L for? ... it's not like you're rich enough to bin 50pcs 980X during the weekend

2Gb D9GMH modules don't exist (in non-ECC variant), that's why value RAM clocks better with 4-4-4

hwbot is a non-profit organisation?

if this is fatbody then it's no big deal

so when the rev4 is actually coming, Pieter ?

is that real Vcore or you're overdoing it with Vtt ?

gotta love the board marketing via cherry CPUs...

I'll use that picture of Karl and hang it on the wall next time when I grind some hardware points

Guys, can you just stop arguing over what generally is a very old problem ? As an objective observer (well, sort of) I find both "guilty" and "innocent" scenarios equally possible as I don't see any argument or proof which leaves absolutely no (ZERO!) chance of the contrary having happened or not happened. As it was already discussed on this site, there are two ways to stop such threads from being created - one is to implement software SN detection (not going to happen), second is to make worse score of the two/three similar ones bring less points than it should (IS going to happen with rev4 very soon).

why did you use two cards on a 1xGPU run ?

does the pre-testing on safe/default clocks count as well? CPU / VGA differ a lot too

lots of artifacts, but a nice score ... beats my 119k backup

is it my card ? gpu 940/1.32V on water looks really strong

when will an SLI score follow ? also, does GTX285@1100 give better 01 scores than 275@1300 ?

very nice chip there, 300MHz better than mine on LN2, lol what's the batch ?

I think we've already discussed that it's a difficult thing to measure hence we use the current scoring system, no ?

Chiller, current score algorythm awards points mostly based on "how much people you beat" rather than "how good your score is" hence multi-CPU systems score low since not much people have them.

this makes such a nice base for lots of marketing CPU-Z validations

I wonder why it took so long ... with his knowledge, Rajinder could have found a nice job at some vendor ages ago.

ever wondered why noone has ever shown any successfully unHSed pics of STT ?

to be honest, I think that this effect is based more on hype/marketing than actually making a perfect overclocking motherboard BlackOps - I had an ES board (from the QF programme). Works well only with a QX9650 when raw CPU freq is needed. Overclocking with other CPU models / efficency / FSB+memory clocking was rather poor, definitely not a multi-purpose board like *COUGH* ASUS X38/X48-series. Classified - I had a few (owned one myself + tested a couple of others' boards at events), just couldn't see why everyone was bragging so much about it .. may be because I'm from Europe and eVGA service/availability is far from the best over here. R3E Black - didn't have one. But from the feedback I heard, it's a poinless product since it couldn't do anything a cheaper R3F wasn't capable of .. except, may be, 4-way SLI which not that much people care about.

batch doesn't mean a thing

don't you have a P4GD1/P4GPL-X ? and the multi on an XE chip won't go upwards ?

what's the batch of that retail ?