Stelaras

Thanks for the update . Let's see pcmark scores at 60000+ !!

So .. ram caching is also allow in pcmark05 ! That's great ! A few days ago I had some runs with 2500 general usage and 3000 virus scan ... but i thought it was forbidden .

YEs , 1.0ns Qimonda ... but , as you raise the gpu clocks , you have to lower the memory clocks in order to maintain stability. I don't know if it's a general issue with the G9X cards . It could be the IMC , or the memory IC's . Did you have a simillar experience with the 9600GT ?

My card is similar to this : http://www.easycom.com.ua/video/ecs_n9600gt-2gms-p/ The only differences are that it has 512MB , so no memory IC's on the back side of the PCB ... and qimonda crap memory .

No , I didn't try it without the E-POWER . I prepared & modded the card from from the start . TY .

Yes ! Thanks .

The card is powered from EVGA Untouchables . Also , i don't have cold slow . Thanks .

Nice find ! It's great if you managed to disable tessellation , but i think it must be something else . At these clocks , even without tessellation , this score is very high. Nvidia should give us an option like ATI has.

Thanks Steve .

How do you know that the scores that doesn't show the cpu-z screenshots are valid ? We should first do some tests and afterwards decide what should be done. Also , i think that it should be mandatory to have all the cpu-z screenshots also .

Congats to Poland for winning . Also to Indonesia for showing some very good scores ! It was an amazing contest ! We didn't have much time to test 4way .Our problems began after 30 minutes playing , just when the system memory started coldbuggin .It took us too long to understand it ... and we run out of time .

I'll try to test it again next week . Keep us informed .

Happy new year !!!

I want to see subzero action !!! ΥΓ . Παλι εκανες καταθεση !!!

There was a tweak i found with the web page rendering ... It's not legit . And with this tweak i made the 8500 score and Aristidis the 9000+ .I will delete both scores as they are not valid as per rules. I'll talk with Massman and Jarnis from Futuremark about the "way" to boost the web pages.

This run is fully valid , with no broken rules. If i knew that the Indonesian guys had a better average , i should have tried to make a better run . We are only 4.33 points behind .

Forgot it ... We were benching till 5AM here ... Will fix it soon . Sorry .

Forgot it ... We were benching till 5AM here ... Will fix it soon . Sorry .

Not bat at all ! Very good run .

Seems that cpu-z show wrong the uncore frequency with high dividers... I did a quick search and same issue here ... http://hwbot.org/submission/2198517_thl_memory_clock_ddr3_sdram_1537_mhz Also ... http://hwbot.org/submission/2235758_kintaro_memory_clock_ddr3_sdram_1386_mhz

I used the controller from our teammate Tiltevros . If i recall , Stevero and Computurd have very strong storage setups . Why didn't you arrange something ? I'm far away from called a warehouse overclocker . Only the 580 lightning is not paid . It's the MOA card .

Hope this helps , but is's all i could find with a quick search. http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1416304#post1416304

I was testing various setups . This one was with the Areca 1880 and 8+ SSD's .. The systeminfo hangs on win8 . There is a problem with the cpuidsdk.dll library . I think they have to use the dll'sfrom the last 1.59 cpuz in order to work . That's why everything is unknown .

Thank you Pieter for the detailed answer .

That means that these rules don't apply to pcmark7 ???????? Update 17th March 2010: Any software or human interaction causing the benchmark application to fail to (properly) render the textures or making the rendered image to differ too much from the original due to other software tweaking Update 20th July 2010: Any software or human interaction causing the benchmark to use different calculation algorithms as intended by the original software creator. E.g. replacing the codec or browser in PCMark2005.