I.nfraR.ed

Yes, it's also faster for 9900X and even 7000 series.

Great run! I don't have backups and would need LN2 for more.

Show us the 8.8GHz already! Great score.

There's a problem with linking forum comments with a submission and it appears to assign the first commenter as the score owner, e.g. this is unity's submission. The link to the actual score is also gone, it seems.

I use a browser plugin "dark reader" to make any site in dark mode, so that's not a big deal and I don't think a dark mode will ever be implemented in hwbot. It works well on most sites and you can turn off on site basis.

Commenting on submissions from the site is not possible - Bad Request (400) in the browser console and absolutely no feedback in the UI.

If that was designed from the ground up, have you considered a library with ready to use components and if yes, can you share the reason for the current approach? I personally like the styling of Tailwind. I know there are pros and cons with everything, but a library would possibly give you responsive layout out of the box, consistent styling, fonts, paddings, etc. For a small dev team and large site that might be the easier solution. Displaying large sets of data and forms on a site is one of the hardest things to design. As for the fonts, Verdana and Ariel are really outdated for the web, they must only be used as fallbacks. There are many modern web fonts that are much nicer, I personally used Rubik for my site, but a typical font-family definition looks like this: "Rubik", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif where "Rubik" is my embedded web font. It depends whether you want the same font on all devices or not. Other popular web fonts are Lato, Montserrat, Roboto, Noto Sans, Open Sans. You also need to account for localization, but I don't think that is a feature you're going to support. PS: I don't know what jquery is still used for, but the versoin is really old (from 2012). PS2: I feel few things are better, but overall there's no consistency and the perception is not that good - perhaps there aren't many common components and layouts and everything is done per page basis, which would be a nightmare to fix and support. There are also many UX issues, e.g. like tags/pills looking exactly the same as buttons, no loading indicators (page simply jumps when a container gets its data replaced), non-clickable elements like dropdown list items (you need to click on the text), inconsistent pointer style (cursor).

Awesome!

I've already shown him my current best (10.178), so I loose, but will get back to it after FX-6300 comp. SMT off is a bit slower, but clocks higher and temps are lower. My issue is ccd1 and if I can't somehow get it sorted, I will have to buy a different chip. Difference between both ccds is huge: 400-500MHz.

Probably will...and everybody would need to rebench again

Thanks, it's just a quick test, but ccd1 is pretty bad I can't get it to pass above 5150 even on chiller, while ccd0 does 5600+ at the same conditions. This run is 5300/5150. Otherwise the cpu does well - fclk 2233 is only stable on cold, but posts on air. 8800 memory also posts.

GT2 totally bugged

Very good cpu and score, congrats!

Excellent score!

Very nice efficiency, I'm obviously missing something.

@l0ud_sil3nc3Your score is also fast for the clocks! Would be easy #1 with better cooling.

Thanks. I had 11.709, but lost it after resintalling windows as new benchmate can only work in Program Files and I forgot to copy on usb :D

It's the same bios, just a bit higher mem frequency and better settings. Haven't tried the newest bios yet.

Impressive cpu, congrats!

This time around it seems I won't be able to compete with LN2 scores, but might get LN2 myself at some point. Yes, win11 is faster, but I think there's more to gain.

Very nice! I am 11.270 at 5.3, but there seems to be some sort of a clock stretching or throttling at higher frequencies ( chiller).

It happened to me as well, that's how I noticed.

Unfortunately this has the AlgorithmFailedException. It has been reported to BenchMate developer that even though the score is not valid, it still appears to be accepted.

A photo of the system is required for TeamCup. Check the rules here: https://hwbot.org/competition/HWBOT Team CUP 2024 - AMD CPU/stage/5817_gpupi_for_cpu_v3.2_-_1b_-_am4 :p

Yeah, many times less is more. If you're unstable, then tight timings or high freq are just for the screenshot. Good score!