I.nfraR.ed

trololo pretest, max on stock cooler

Well, ok, but 400+ MHz difference? I saved the log, but the system is disassembled now. Will tell you what is written there later.

How is it unstable when with the old wrapper I can run 7.5 and the new wrapper complains about it even at 7GHz? Same settings in both cases. With several tries sometimes it runs, but it's 1:10 or so. When really high freq it does not run at all.

At cpu clock > 7-7.1GHz the new wrapper keeps telling me to restore original benchmark files when I try to run the bench. Reinstalling doesn't fix it. Log does not say anything useful. With 2.26 7.5GHz is ok, please don't discontinue 2.26

He validated it on the 3rd CU (CU2). Nonetheless amazing cpu.

Concentrating on the CountryCup, being very productive lately:

Common, I have no reason to run mine at 6.6 if you are at 6.1

It's not that common, but yes - they do.

This is the method we're going to use, but still unlocked ABX is more convenient.

Watch out for delimiters. Enter frequencies and scores exactly as you see them on the tools and benchmarks - cpuz, gpuz, etc. I mean, don't write 3280,25, but 3280.25. If you use comma as a delimiter, the conversion string -> floating-point will fail.

I got a resonse telling me to download the normal version. Second response was that Extreme version is not public. Thanks, MSI, I didn't know it!

Yes, but Massman explained that this is called Dual Graphics, not Hybrid. For Hybrid only Llano + 2-3 possible discrete videocards qualify. Not saying it's the right thing, but that's what he explained. As I see it the difference is the naming scheme only... http://www.cpu-world.com/info/AMD/Recommended_graphics_cards_for_AMD_dual-graphics.html Basically you should look at the first table only. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I've understood so far. There was a discussion earlier in this thread.

You can't, it's not eligible for the 3DMark03 stage I don't know how to submit it as a regular entry in the hwbot database either...

Yes, I don't really expect a response. Who am I? Some unknown poor overclocker from Bulgaria. Wait, where was that? Is that a country? Guess I will use other methods to increase the voltage.

I and my teammates have scores with 2.26 that haven't been uploaded yet. Never tried to find a cheat in it. Force it when it is working on all systems...

What if there's no MSI rep in Bulgaria and I've imported HD7970 Lightning (new from RMA, no warranty) from US? How can I possibly get the Extreme version of Afterburner? Who should I contact? PS: I can't find HQ's email.

No Explorer window opened. explorer.exe was running, so taskbar was active, but no window was opened. I ended up testing with 2.26.

2.52.107 still does not go to fullscreen on AM2+ system, just like 2.51. I see two black rectangles on the screen. If I kill the wrapper, then aquamark goes to fullscreen. Will have to bench with the old 2.26. I hope it is acceptable. XP SP2, AM2+ socket, dual-core cpu.

I have the same issue with my 790X-UD3P and I got a replacement mosfets, but haven't tried to fix it yet. IIRC it's even the same mosfet that failed. Don't even remember where I put them though.

Trolling like always

Corrected it for ya.

I tried up to 2400 NB and ram has the same timings as yours, but higher freq (about 1250), tight subs. Usual loading time is about 17-18K and there was only one time it did 13K. Ramdisk didn't help at all, that's why I asked if it's reproducible every time, or at least 90% of the runs.

You can try Asus. I believe their top board might be the best, but if your APU does not have a good IMC, then any board won't help.

Not only for RAM, but also has no issue with bclk in IDE mode. 1300MHz is bad IMC. You're aiming at 1400+. And I feel Asrock generally more stable.

Is this reproducible at all? I've managed to reach 13000ms loading time just once at your cpu freq and it seemed completely random.