ground

6 GB in Dual Channel? Memory channel dropping issues?

Over 14 years this score stood. Finally to be broken.

Mad memory clocks for 775 :D

One more round! Pick the GPU: https://strawpoll.com/NPgxE7DmeZ2 and the bench: https://strawpoll.com/kjn18JekJyQ Polls are open til 11:00 GMt+2 on the 18th.

The final minute wall on 775 has been broken!

Given how I had 3/10 chips do easy 725 I'd be more worried about board sharing then CPU sharing here tbh

its kinda absurd having 730 fsb as 6th place on a mobo :D A bit over a year ago this would've been global top 5

Good job! New Chip?

The filename of the image ? Well played Seby!

33MHz under WR on a live stage, impressive, especially with a new IC!

Figured out fullpot?

he was a couple minutes too late to get the score

its a bit sad to see your Celeron D globals disappear, but great to see more people breaking into the 8.5+ range on RPL!

Strong IMC!

@TAGGweren't you looking for a proper board?

generation like DDR2,DDR3, DDR4 etc. CPU generation like processor core.

Any mods done to the board yet? Great score!

would also make it very impractical for anyone who wants to participate despite not having an XOC board - would have to hope that someone posted the bios already. anyways, dumped all bioses from manufacturer site for boards I might use: z690 strix D4 z690 unify-x

Hello, Yesterday on discord there was once again a discussion about there being no point in pushing older platforms to their limit in memory benches, though the focus was on memory frequency. Memory benches can output wildly different results on different platforms despite being ran at similar memory settings (pyprime AM4 vs LGA 1200 for example), making it not even worth it to run them on many platforms. Thus we arrived at the following suggestion: Change memory benchmarks from hwpoints per DDR generation + globals overall to hwpoints per CPU Socket and memory globals from overall to per DDR generation. An alternative suggestion of per CPU generation was also thrown into the room, but that one might be much harder to implement. I've added it to the poll anyways. Following this suggestion would also have global rankings no longer be the exact same ranking as WR ranking, similar to how it is with multicore benches. Globals per DDR generation might also motivate some people to push for some of the older DDR* records which have remained unbroken for years at this point. - why not per memory IC? There is no required input field for it - it would be impossible to track for older scores and would require massive effort collecting the data for older scores if possible at all. Also very easy to wrongly identify some IC. - why not per chipset? Motherboard was never required as an input field for memory benchmarks. It would require a lot of manual work sorting through all the scores missing the motherboard entry.

% OC - reach +50% OC +100% OC +150% OC +200% OC etc +100% BCLK / +200% BCLK Take your Time - Submit a Cinebench R20 run with <=99 cb

is the inner channel better on Unify-X? On Gigabyte I walled at ~5800 inner channel, 6300 outer channel (outer mem limited)

Holy shit

https://hwbot.org/submission/5146492_ 4GHz Westmere. Still playing with only 4GHz uncore. Lazy mems since my chiller isn’t set up right now. Also very sloppy final loop, just a rerun could probably get this one down half a second or more.

DDR4 BCLK! Nice!

Strong chip!