havli

X4 845 is (supposedly) 5+ pieces in stock here in CZ. http://www.czc.cz/amd-athlon-x4-845/186690/produkt

Well, for me s479 is much more interesting... simply because when benchmarking P4 -> no LN2 = no chance to get decent score.

Don't forget pci-e -> AGP adapter. Anyway, round 4 will be interesting. My Pentium M 770 + CT479 are waiting.

Please add this board: Asus P2L-B http://valid.x86.fr/pa6rkg Thx.

Please add this board: Jetway 815EPDA Thx.

Yes, but there are no special chars in path to the Desktop. Christian Ney suggested to disable system info - which solved the problem. Most likely some kind of incompatibility between my HW and Aquamark.

I'm getting this error when trying to upload Aquamark score: Same error for two different data files. Aquamark wrapper is the latest version 2.55.110

Same here, direct upload to maxxpi.net seems to be working, but no validation link is generated.

Thank you

Please add Abit SD7-533

Is there mandatory screenshot-background for this competition?

Good scores everyone. 3DM99 was really chalenging and fun. PCM04... well this one isn't my strong point. Looking forward to the next stage. No need for PLL mods and multiplier unlockers on s423.

Great score, I can't get even close to this effectivity. My pluto @ 972 does only ~8200 points. I guess it is time to check the KX133 board again.

Vcore 1.8V

Latest cpu-z is only needed for online validation, as the older version validation file is not accepted. For normal submission you can use any version. And yes, this score was made on win98.

Thank you I figured higher CPU clock is out of the question (build external PLL or increase multiplier is difficult)... so I went for perf/clock effectivity.

Is that really DVI on that videocard? I've never seen TNT2 with DVI, let alone M64.

Could be MB limit or the external L2 cache is holding you back.

1,1GHz TBird... so much power I wish I had at least 800 MHz TBird, or the goldfinger device. I believe I could get over 9k as well.

Yes, no mods on the MB... well except fresh capacitors, as the original ones were completely dead.

Sure, why not. My Tbird is pretty bad overclocker though http://hwbot.org/submission/2256175_havli_superpi___1m_athlon_700mhz_%28slot_t_bird%29_2min_35sec_964ms And I think it won't be faster than Pluto 900 MHz... let's see.

We have a winner Anyway, I'll try to do my best even if the chance to get good position is slim. Now... where did I put that Tbird 700..

If I understand this properly... in short this proposed change would mean all submissions scoring less than 75%/50% of the best result in HW/GL category are basically worthless in terms of getting points? For example Core 2 Duo E6600 PCMark 05 HW ranking: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/pcmark_2005/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_873&cores=2#start=0#interval=20 http://hwbot.org/submission/2363595_havli_pcmark_2005_core_2_e6600_%282.4ghz%29_20228_marks The top score is 36998 marks, my score is 20228 marks. At the moment my submission is ranked 27th out of 227 and getting 17.3 points. However in the new system it would mean 0.1 points... since is only 54.67% of the top score? This new system seems to be working very similar to the current one in rankings with uniform score distribution. However rankings with few good scores and many average ones doesn't look very good. Example - R11.5 32cores global http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r11.5/rankings?cores=32#start=0#interval=20 Top score = 43.24... the lower treshold is 43.24*0.5 = 21.62. So it seems anything at current position 8 and below will get just 1 point.

This background is just the banner from the oc-esports website. So the screenshot is not really valid, imho. Anyway, I'm sure both mine and Gumanoid`s score will be replaced by a faster run in the future and it will use the correct competition background which will be available at that time.

Thank you. I'm sure this score will not hold first place for long. This Ultra is SDRAM based - EliteMT 5.5 ns. Not very good overclocker... but this stage is mostly about CPU, so it should be sufficient. http://hw-museum.cz/view-vga.php?vgaID=86