havli

Is there mandatory screenshot-background for this competition?

Good scores everyone. 3DM99 was really chalenging and fun. PCM04... well this one isn't my strong point. Looking forward to the next stage. No need for PLL mods and multiplier unlockers on s423.

Great score, I can't get even close to this effectivity. My pluto @ 972 does only ~8200 points. I guess it is time to check the KX133 board again.

Vcore 1.8V

Latest cpu-z is only needed for online validation, as the older version validation file is not accepted. For normal submission you can use any version. And yes, this score was made on win98.

Thank you I figured higher CPU clock is out of the question (build external PLL or increase multiplier is difficult)... so I went for perf/clock effectivity.

Is that really DVI on that videocard? I've never seen TNT2 with DVI, let alone M64.

Could be MB limit or the external L2 cache is holding you back.

1,1GHz TBird... so much power I wish I had at least 800 MHz TBird, or the goldfinger device. I believe I could get over 9k as well.

Yes, no mods on the MB... well except fresh capacitors, as the original ones were completely dead.

Sure, why not. My Tbird is pretty bad overclocker though http://hwbot.org/submission/2256175_havli_superpi___1m_athlon_700mhz_%28slot_t_bird%29_2min_35sec_964ms And I think it won't be faster than Pluto 900 MHz... let's see.

We have a winner Anyway, I'll try to do my best even if the chance to get good position is slim. Now... where did I put that Tbird 700..

If I understand this properly... in short this proposed change would mean all submissions scoring less than 75%/50% of the best result in HW/GL category are basically worthless in terms of getting points? For example Core 2 Duo E6600 PCMark 05 HW ranking: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/pcmark_2005/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_873&cores=2#start=0#interval=20 http://hwbot.org/submission/2363595_havli_pcmark_2005_core_2_e6600_%282.4ghz%29_20228_marks The top score is 36998 marks, my score is 20228 marks. At the moment my submission is ranked 27th out of 227 and getting 17.3 points. However in the new system it would mean 0.1 points... since is only 54.67% of the top score? This new system seems to be working very similar to the current one in rankings with uniform score distribution. However rankings with few good scores and many average ones doesn't look very good. Example - R11.5 32cores global http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r11.5/rankings?cores=32#start=0#interval=20 Top score = 43.24... the lower treshold is 43.24*0.5 = 21.62. So it seems anything at current position 8 and below will get just 1 point.

This background is just the banner from the oc-esports website. So the screenshot is not really valid, imho. Anyway, I'm sure both mine and Gumanoid`s score will be replaced by a faster run in the future and it will use the correct competition background which will be available at that time.

Thank you. I'm sure this score will not hold first place for long. This Ultra is SDRAM based - EliteMT 5.5 ns. Not very good overclocker... but this stage is mostly about CPU, so it should be sufficient. http://hw-museum.cz/view-vga.php?vgaID=86

Looks really interesting. I already have HW for all rounds, looking forward to it.

Thank you. btw - the XP issue only applies to Asus boards or is it global thing for all Z170 + non-K OC?

Is there a chance to get working AVX and winXP support in the future?

Looks good. working fine with Firefox, Chrome and Edge. IE11 is broken though.

Your card is regular Vanta. Vanta LT is using different (smaller) GPU and usually has only 8MB of SDRAM. http://hw-museum.cz/view-vga.php?vgaID=182

I believe it is a typo... and because of that memory type is not selected correctly when submitting X265 Benchmark results. Thank you.

Nice score. It is good to see the benchmark is working well even on extreme machine like this.

Please add: Opteron 8384 Thx.

Just to be sure - only one score per person counts for each stage, right?

Your score seems to be valid, HPET is not required when using windows 7. I did some BCLCK overclocking/underclocking testing with and without HPET during the benchmark development and there is no influence on the final score. Reason your score is better than others is benchmark settings (all built-in tweaks are allowed). HPET (disabled) is not responsible for this.