TASOS

It's not the only case , that moderating ... looks the other way. http://hwbot.org/submission/2484028_amateurs_cinebench_r15_core_i7_4770k_1209_cb I dont like to report such scores ... just for typical reasons. // Anyway i made my point here. At the end moderators here decide what's proper each time. Case closed.

Imagine how fair would that be ... that purely typical consistency of rules enforcement ... in today's UCBENCH world record. Just because they partially covered in their screenshot the result tab and the command line tab. A great score ... not exactly by the book ... blocked ???

My opinion is that this submission doesnt deserve to be blocked , just because the wrong tab of gpuz got infront when the screenshot was captured. The score is not out of line There is proof of beeing a gtx-670 all over the place. The score is not even awarded with points. Dont give that user , the feeling of a wasted effort , just for a minor , pointless flaw. Please reconsider.

Yes , that's the one. With the wrong tab of gpuz.

I thought that this matter was sorted out. I dont recall , that the gpu screenshot was missing. Can you please upload the screenshot.

Who deleted this submission ? http://hwbot.org/submission/2448835_

You got pm.

There must be something wrong with Sargas core and this bench. It doesnt look normal , they cant be scoring so low.

ok I think ,i'll give it a try for just under 2.00 volt next weekend and see how it goes. Thanks

I was at 1.9volt (bios) for this validation and there was enough improvement from previous @1.85volt. I am tempted for more ... but i dont want to risk and lose these sticks , both do almost identical speed. That's why i ask.

How much voltage is considered to be safe for aircooled CFR ? Just for max validation ... not benching. I want to see if this mem module have any more speed left (or my IMC perhaps). http://hwbot.org/submission/2480558_tasos_memory_clock_ddr3_sdram_1727.8_mhz

You've got a pm.

Another odd thing is , that he always have perfectly rounded numbers on fsb. ?

In team achievement section. The one for 2500 golden cups , should be a level 6 (instead of level 3)and it has a wrong icon also.

That's just a news post from a tech site and nothing more. That procedure , doesnt make sense at all. Perhaps you should reconsider things a bit more. There's even different NDA types (non-disclosure agreement) and dates for different persons. Even more , there where NDA's and announcements in the past and no official release of a product (AMD cpu's for example). You are blocking results for typical reasons and minor details ... and on the other hand you are permitting results done with a non existant board or a board that only friends and family of the company actually had , at that date. Anyway that's my opinion. At the end it's your call. Your game , your rules.

NDA is not the case here. Is there a link for the official release of the board with an October date ? Cause the one i posted above (from asus.com) , clearly shows 20/11/2013.

Ticket ID: 1848 Priority: Low Please add this one also. http://ark.intel.com/products/69360/Intel-Pentium-Processor-997-2M-Cache-1_60-GHz

Yeap , that's it. Thanks Too many almost identical cpu's

Hi there I dont want to mess with any of the results. At the beggining , i was trying to figure out what kind of result is this one http://valid.canardpc.com/78t5qp

First of all , congrats to the winners and all participants. I've got a "strange" e-mail , with a question for the hwbot crew (i dont know from who and why they picked me for it ... i have no clue). The question for the hwbot crew is : The results done and submitted with a Rampage IV Black Edition , are considered valid results for the competition of Country Cup ? http://www.asus.com/News/aFpGZ4W8zTa9IOQl

Ticket ID: 1847 Priority: Low Actually almost the same as B815 , with different Intel HD gpu speed. http://ark.intel.com/products/55657/Intel-Celeron-Processor-B810-2M-Cache-1_60-GHz http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/292/Intel_Mobile_Celeron_Dual-Core_B810_vs_Intel_Mobile_Celeron_Dual-Core_B815.html Should we add it ? Cause i see mixed results in the B815 section.

This result also needs a correction regarding real cpu speed , for statistical reasons.

What's the real frequency for this bench ? Is it 5770 ? Somebody must edit and correct it , even for statistical reasons.

I keep getting this message

Does this Gigabyte service-tool still work ? http://gigabytedaily.blogspot.gr/2012/02/really-cool-gigabyte-mobo-warranty.html Is there an alternative for Europe ?