Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TASOS

Members
  • Posts

    1583
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

Everything posted by TASOS

  1. Contact Futuremark ???
  2. Greek translation is ready.
  3. You've got a point here.
  4. Hi There is a general problem , all members in the team have incorrect points. I guess team points are incorrect too. Recalculating doesn´t work. Neither as a team recalculating nor as single member recalculating. Can you please look it up ?
  5. @Dead Things I would like to ask you something about your matrox vga. Did powerstrip read your core and mem clocks from the beggining ? Any special treatment ? I got a similar P690 pci-e and i could o/c it.
  6. Congrats to all teams and members participating in this cup !!! Many congrats to the winning team. Very good results in the first three stages.
  7. Any chance of making something similar for VIA chipset ??? http://valid.canardpc.com/2nv9ep This cpuz version for socket 370 (815 chipset) isnt working on VIA.
  8. For stage-1 http://hwbot.org/competition/feb_teamcup_warmup/stage/1240_cloud_gate_gt_610/ Can we also use the regular version of GT-520 ? Which is the exact same product to GT-610 (simply renamed). Exact same core (GF119) , exact same specs (Shaders / TMUs / ROPs = 48 / 8 / 4). http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/285/geforce-gt-520.html
  9. We posted the same time. Thank you.
  10. link please. *edit* Are you talking about this one ? http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=53897
  11. I guess , i cant participate with a board (Asus CUV4X) that cpu-z CANT read the memory speed ? http://valid.canardpc.com/2nv9ep
  12. Are the on-board (chipset) graphics allowed ??? Are they considered to be videocards ???
  13. Nice moooove ... this rookie cup !!! I like it. :celebration:
  14. It's not the only case , that moderating ... looks the other way. http://hwbot.org/submission/2484028_amateurs_cinebench_r15_core_i7_4770k_1209_cb I dont like to report such scores ... just for typical reasons. // Anyway i made my point here. At the end moderators here decide what's proper each time. Case closed.
  15. Imagine how fair would that be ... that purely typical consistency of rules enforcement ... in today's UCBENCH world record. Just because they partially covered in their screenshot the result tab and the command line tab. A great score ... not exactly by the book ... blocked ???
  16. My opinion is that this submission doesnt deserve to be blocked , just because the wrong tab of gpuz got infront when the screenshot was captured. The score is not out of line There is proof of beeing a gtx-670 all over the place. The score is not even awarded with points. Dont give that user , the feeling of a wasted effort , just for a minor , pointless flaw. Please reconsider.
  17. Yes , that's the one. With the wrong tab of gpuz.
  18. I thought that this matter was sorted out. I dont recall , that the gpu screenshot was missing. Can you please upload the screenshot.
  19. Who deleted this submission ? http://hwbot.org/submission/2448835_
  20. You got pm.
  21. There must be something wrong with Sargas core and this bench. It doesnt look normal , they cant be scoring so low.
×
×
  • Create New...