Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TASOS

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1526

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

 Content Type 

Posts posted by TASOS

    Giant 3D elephant in the room no one wants to talk about...(why is it always me bringing this stuff to light?)

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    I dont know if your posts are about something or someone in particular.

    But i will speak in general.

    Since you know/find out some very specific issues about this RTX 4xxx series , why not make an article about it ?

    This stuff is new and many people would like to overclock it up to the edge of stability.

    They probably wont have a clue if their big score is bugged (except if the result/run is too obvious , like in 2k3).

    Are we having something similar like the 3DMark Vantage era ?

     

    Give them a heads up

    Dont assume that everyone is acting with bad intention 

    • Thanks 1

    The official Pentium 4 3.4Ghz (Prescott) processor discussion thread.

    in General hardware discussion

    Posted

    3 hours ago, IdeaFix said:

    Yes, 478. It was 2, may be 3 processors. I have a 3.4GHz Prescott now and my results in 64 bit mode are higher than 32 bit ones. For example here - https://hwbot.org/submission/5124019_ I have Biostar on g31 with 478, asrock on 945 with 478 and some server boards. This result was on EM64T cpu too - https://hwbot.org/submission/4183403_mrgenius_cinebench___r20_pentium_4_3.4ghz_(prescott)_103_cb Also i have a 478 to 774 adapter, and I think this cpu should be splitted from regilar prescott-1m.

    Not my call ...

    But to be honest there are numerous examples of Intel's own modified cpu's , and there is no need for a split.

    The most recent example is the Alder Lakes , where the first batches had the AVX512 instructions and the later not.

    They all compete into the same category.

     

    2 hours ago, IdeaFix said:

    SL7Q8 (EM64T), SL7QB (EM64T), SL8JX (EM64T, NX/xD??)

    Now , for the history.

    SL8JX was never (to my knowledge) proven to have EM64T (G1 stepping and not a special production cpu)

    Furthermore Intel document 302352-033 did not noted them as EM64T capable.

     

    On the other hand SL7Q8 and SL7QB , both special and limited production for IBM are verified EM64T.

     

     

    The official Pentium 4 3.4Ghz (Prescott) processor discussion thread.

    in General hardware discussion

    Posted

    2 hours ago, IdeaFix said:

    I think it is necessary to separate the results of a processor with EM64T support and without support for these technologies. There are several s478 processors with EM64T support and several motherboards based on "modern" chipsets, which will not allow you to achieve high results, but will allow you to formally pass some tests.

    You are talking about socket 478

    Are you sure about "several" ?

    I always thought it was a couple.

     

×
×
  • Create New...