Antinomy

Nice to see you back, @klopcha

Already here. Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/extensa_2519/

Already here: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/lnvnb161216/ One hell of a name. Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/a6_9225/

Don't see a thread on this case but current Aquamark wrapper doesn't work on old GPUs. Tested on Prosavage DDR, SiS 315 integrated and Mirage. The benchmark itself works as usual. The wrapper shows a black screen for a second after you hit the run button and immediately pops back to main screen. Systeminfo, priority and the rest don't help with this one. 315.zip is SiS 651 chipset. Aquamark.zip is SiS 661 chipset. Aquamark3.zip 315.zip

But not benchmark's

Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x11scz_f/

It's pretty much the same as changing DirectX which also affects 3DMark but is legal because you don't touch the benchmark itself. But if you replace the audio encoder dll in PCMark, this would be illegal as it is part of the benchmark. Excellent tweak and thanks for sharing!!!

Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/nb116/

Excellent, first place!

Excellent work, Nikolay! )

Nailed it! Congratulations, Bones!

Excellent score, Doc!

Old school power. Well done!

You're right, looks like SS. Fine for me. But you should add a description that it's an old result so everyone knows. There's enough sandbaggers who can start arguing.

Hey, fella, nice score. But new rules require using CPU-Z 1.91 or newer. Don't forget to update for next scores. Cheers!

added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/fm2a78_pro4_plus/

So? You should stop cussing and do your homework. Integrated chips are fun because they're hard. You need to know some advanced stuff to show good results. It's not a thing for newbies. Uchi matchast' and good luck.

Full stock, after CMOS clear. Only disabled COM/MIDI/Audio. Nothing overclocked or tweaked. Like my friend Ilya Cemenko aka TiN said: " Uchi matchast' "

You see "The benchmark was not run using default settings" ? Mine doesn't because it's run under default settings like your first 4 runs.

Great score!

3DMark 2001SE is run on its defaults. And I think you should mind you language. It't SiS 651. If you open your eyes, you can see this easily.

That's some terrific job you've done. Took me a while to follow you studies. I'll check my disk - remember having some AMD NDAs that might help. One file is in archive - does anyone know a tool to crack password fast enough? Oh, BTW - how about testing these regs for Multiplier-on-the-fly for Nforce2? Guess I'll put to keep all NF2 stuff in one place.

I'd love to know how you got +50 points on this hardware between runs. Could you repeat >185 points?

Not KT - 50-52 are not host bus like on others but are S2K, bus disconnect and others things. But yes, on other systems (s7, 370, 478) these are the main ones. of course. And 1T set as well. Timings set from BIOS, command rate set via registers. Nothing else - didn't give much boost. KT266A is faster by itself than KT266 and I believe than SiS 735.

Yep, SiS is a very nice chipset. I've been considering to use one of my SiS 735 boards but found KT266A to be better.