Antinomy

Yeah, keeping PCI-E sync to FSB really helps for those 9x5 chipsets.

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/945plcap/

nice mutant https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p4_combo/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/se7230nh1lx/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/lv_674/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p5gc_vm_pro/ Тот ещё Хуанань https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/koloe_x58/

I'd add this quote as a signature

Excellent clocks and nice work!

Not only mine. Your score is way out of line, about twice higher than most others. And given it's run at almost stock it looks like too high for such clocks. If it weren't a bug, you'd have crazy eff in 2001 too. And you'd have around 197 points in 03 with stock 133/400 FSB/MEM which seems unrealistic given all scores for SiS 651/661. Just my opinion, I think mods will sort this out.

Very nice but looks like a bugged result. Common for 03 Wings subtest. Able to make a video of a >180 result?

Posted by wytiwx on XS years ago. In two words - BSEL mod.

I've seen some great work over here. Found some old stuff on my hard drive. Hope this can bring some light on chipset and SIP, enjoy. NVIDIA.zip AMD.zip

Insane result! 8GHZ 32m stable, wow.

Wow! Outstanding score. Looks like IGP will be fun this year. Keep the great work!

2000 on Coppermine, wow. Great work!

Отличный результат для воздуха!

Шикарный результат и лютая память!

@Leeghoofd, what's the position on old results being submitted? I've found a small pile of socket 7 results that haven't been published and are about 8 years old. CPU-Z is outdated on those obviously. Not that it changes anything on 25 year old hardware.

Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce4_mx_440_8x_32bit/

Very nice score

https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_fx_5600_xt_64bit/ GPU-Z screenshot?

Where's WR, Lebowski? )

Gigabyte P45 is not about efficiency I think you need MCHbar editing for speed. But this is what makes them clock nice.

Great work, excellent efficiency.

No, not to me. Well, the point is to make it's behaviour like the original Aquamark. So settings don't get downscaled on modern hardware, only on old ones. Like the original Aquamark was.

IMHO it would be best to behave like original Aquamark - set default settings on auto but when hardware can't make it, lower down to it's capabilities. So you can't lower settings below default for capable hardware (like things are now) but so you can run it on older hardware with lowered settings by Aqua itself. I'll provide any help I can to fix this, just PM me.

This. Menu items have been created, but aren't published on CMOS setup pages. You can open these BIOS files with AMIBCP (3.37 or 3.46) and look at the "BIOS strings" tab. There are some strange names over there. I've got a 4CoreDual-SATA2 board but haven't played with it yet.

Any specific BIOS options or hardware stuff that helped getting there besides voltage? What's interesting, these AsRock board's BIOS has lots of menus hidden. I could unhide them but it'll take much time to test them and how they influence overclocking.