K404

International viewers cant watch it "Currently not allowed to share our videos across U.S. borders"

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=701860 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=704018 these both look too high for the clocks? hardware category: http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_855&name=GeForce+FX+5750+PCX+%2856%29 Thanks for taking the time to examine all these reported results guys!

3DM01 results possibly obtained using mipmap- natures FPS are way too high http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=698991 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696596 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697378 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=706411 The last one might be alright because of the GDDR clocks??? Thanks

2 fairly major odd results: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702648 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702949 Both are miles ahead of the 2nd place scores, despite having MUCH lower clocks. (6600GT) Could be SLI results in the single card section?

Happy birthday Mr Rich!

I do feel that for some teams, people join just to say "look, im part of a great team thats done this this and this" I also appreciate that some people have the best intentions, but dont have the money/access/time to really make a difference. Its a bit harsh, but "no points, no point" would work well to keep teams streamlined

http://www.hwbot.org/hallOfFame.do?type=result&applicationId=14 Atomic and Kingpin are NOT using QX9770 CPUs in Skulltrail, which makes those results gray area. I appreciate they want the scores up, but its wrong to class them under another CPU name until the 9775s are included in CPU ID.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644505 2GHz slower on the CPU, but a full 5 minutes faster? I fail to see how that can be right or possible. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1044&name=Pentium+4+631+%28375%29 (wP 1024)

Old technology, no improvement in any part of it. Doubled up to perform like CF, using Crossfire onboard. Without Crossfire, that card wouldnt be performing how it is. If it was new architecture that performed like that, I wouldnt mind at all. Even if it was a native dual-core in one die. Thats why I voted the way I did K

Just found this on an open job site. Couldnt make this up if I tried. I hope its a joke. "Hi Iam a graduate in IT and studying CCNP(cisco certified network associate) at the moment.I have got CCNA too. As a grduate I have written hundreds of report and essays.I am very good on it.My english is excellent. If you like me to write your school,college,university etc report,essays on Computing and IT then call me on 07xxxxxxx or e-mail me xxxxxxxxxx I'll do it in cheap price. Thanks"

Is it ok to put the emphasis on who has the most endorsements or the deepest pockets, because thats easy to organise and code? My first "Is it ok..." statement wasnt intended to be bitchy, and I dont want this thread to go down that route, no offense was meant!

Nice point SF3D, I was about to add this myself: What about multi-way systems in wPrime? Theres 8 and 16-way servers in there too along with the single-CPU chips. Could/should those be split off into a separate section? Annnddd (lol sorry guys!) 3 and 4-way SLI/CF systems arent fair to 2-way users. Rankings suggest that ya either get a 3 or 4 system, or kiss an attempt at ranking well goodbye. I know its been discussed, but as more lines are being blurred and computers diversify more, is it ok to keep the categories so simple? K

Im not massively happy with the X2 as a single card, but i can see both sides of the argument. Whenever a new top-end card comes out, yup its total dominance, but this card does feel like a cheat slightly (on ATIs part, and soon to be nVs as well) 3DM03 is already a total writeoff for all other cards, but heres hoping its more hassle than its worth to freeze them EDIT: Technically 3 and 4 way GPU setups are unfair too- to everyone without the exact hardware and wallet required, but at least that doesnt affect me

I had no idea that was an option, or bench-legal! Problem possibly solved, cheers!

I know and appreciate that you have a job to do in regard to keeping results as watertight as possible, but im already getting bored of having results taken down because I can only have one published result active at a time in each benchmark. I will NOT spend money on transient support for Futuremark bench suites just for this convenience. What information would be needed in a screenshot? Score breakdown? ORB page with CPU-Z and GPU-Z windows? I frequently bench with services turned off, so thats not really a valid option. There has to be some middle ground.

Yes- its been broken for a long time now

Happens to me as well

If you have em, bench em! No-one can realistically think less of you for it.

LOL Thats a long-running joke between Pred and myself, its not serious It spread to masell as well

We're just getting started......

We're workin on it

yea, been with HWBot from pretty much the start AFAIK...we used to be ranked 2nd after XS! Back in the A64/7800 days!

LOL I love your persistence! Looks like EP-UK is done for. A shame, but at the same time, the way things fell apart as actually pulled people in the UK together. EP-UKs replacement- Bench Tec UK, is doing very well, and will continue to climb. At the moment, it looked like this is what the UK needed to be pushed into action.

Things have got a bit out of hand at EP-UK. The forum went down yesterday afternoon. We thought it was a VBulletin update, but checking a few other forums later on, it transpires EP-UK has been sold to OC3D! This was done without any discussion between EP forum members, and has come as a complete shock to everyone. OC3D, to the best of my knowledge, have not done anything wrong, but there are a lot of angry thoughts at the moment. Some EP-UK members have pulled their scores from HWB, and more are expected to follow. No decisions have been made about the next step for the forum members. We do have a number of options open to us though. Kenny