K404

Better is better! LOL....since you started this thread, your score has more than doubled. That's pretty cool

Any time bro! Can you push to 1066MHz strap for the memory? That will help you for sure

Have you renamed the aquamark3.exe?

Poor performance in XP is down to D3D?

Hey bro! Fermi + XP is terrible for AM3, you need to use W7

DFI: Diva Fails Intermittantly

http://www.coderbag.com/Programming-C/Disable-CPU-Core-Parking-Utility Easier than hunting around in the registry

Complete WIN!!

Showoff Congrats on all your hard work the last few months bro A lot of people noticed!

So how did you get an ES chip and an unreleased board to show off on the ROG site? You've already admitted that Asus hooked you up.

I got a 51 yesterday when my session fell apart. Clear CMOS didn't help. Board still have dried out by now, i'll try this afternoon

I just perfected....and I mean PERFECTED this face this afternoon. Session was going great. Decided it was time for just a few more CPU MHz. GTL crashed, restarted computer, went into BIOS, changed 2 settings. Computer wouldn't POST again. You gotta. be. ****ing. kidding me

Any version/revision of 3D11? Wish Futuremark added a version stamp to the GUI

VERY nice CPU bro!!

I have a 5850 that OCs by 0MHz at stock volts and is still scaling at 1.50v (not been higher) Crap, but true story.

Changing .dll is cheat?

My turtle is corrupted! Somebody help me! FML. All my updated 3DMark installs are bricked. 06 is boned as well because of a bitmap error. HTF is that even possible?? I swear i'm never gonna get WR points again!

At the moment, are FM links only needed if the score has WR points? I *suspect* i'm seeing top-20 scores that FM wouldn't accept (top 20 1x/2x/3x but not enough to get WR points) Christian....the thread you linked to is a year old. Poll made, fairly obvious & clear poll outcome.... no formal decision made for the rules as far as I can see? I suppose that means that by default, the current rule is: only need FM for scores with WR points because benchers can't be penalised for an unclear rule, or have a change in the rules affect already-submitted scores. I just answered my own question

I'd vote for Sam. That'd be AMAZING! Team X: Disqualified. Reason? Running 3DMark11. But this is a 3DMark11 competition! Team X: Banned for one year. Reason? Arguing with judge.

"Industry first" = we'll make the fail product, everyone else will learn from our mistake and make something much better "New and improved" = don't even understand our own marketing, so hedged our bets on buzzwords "Class leading" = niche of an esoteric of an esoteric of a niche of an esoteric niche. "Ultimate" = We'll charge a mega premium for this, then tweak it slightly and gouge you again with the same marketing word "xxxxMHz CPU-Z" = best chance I have of making this component look appealing for sale

I am trying to find the threads that discussed this situation, but so far I can't find anything Benchtec had a separate profile for group/ live event scores. HWB asked that it was discontinued because the idea was open to abuse. I kinda see their point. Every time someone on a forum does an event, you get another "free" set of global results with this method. If you and phil got e.g. 6 results, you could each submit 3. No sharing, no gray area, no worries

Is this "user" allowed within HWB rules? Results posted by Mortisboy and phil? They both have individual accounts as it is. If I remember right, HWB decided to not allow teams to have a seperate account for public/group events.

Not sponsored? Some of your other results come from a 3570K ES CPU and a (unreleased at the time) board sent by Asus? http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?16686-Maximus-V-formula-Preview-Information-Results-Thread&p=113400&viewfull=1#post113400 "ASUS kindly supplied me with it." "Yeah I know I am lucky!!!! Thanks to Peter as always for his support. " Maybe you should move to the pro League

Yes, I reported this score yesterday. IMO, it ain't possible.

Cautious WOOT! Just tried this part: -Go to control panel => uninstall program => sort by date latest installed on => just under 3DMark03 should be SystemInfo => Uninstall it (should be ver3.2 or something) -When it is uninstalled, run 3DMark03, it should tell you: ''Errors occured while initializing Futuremark SystemInfo. [...] please see futuremark.com'' -So this means it worked, now download SystemInfo 4.9 => Install it. And even though I uninstalled 4.9.0 to start with, I just submitted a test result I'll see what happens during benching today, I might owe you a pint Christian