-
Posts
257 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by ksateaaa23
-
Couple of days back, my friend AVALANCHE profile gone completely, then I saw this data restore and he was having around 1700+ career points. right now he has only 35.4 points. most of the subs are gone. I don't know if there are few more profiles like this after data restore. kindly look into it.
-
The official Challenger 2020 Division I round 3 thread.
ksateaaa23 replied to marco.is.not.80's topic in HWBOT Competitions
-
The official Challenger 2020 Division I round 3 thread.
ksateaaa23 replied to marco.is.not.80's topic in HWBOT Competitions
After raising an issue, geekbench 4 stage re-configured per core score to total score...just 4 days to the close of competition. With this my score is pushed from 1st to 20th. Now my query doesn't make sense..... doesn't really matter to me whether this stage gives any points to top five or not. Now the problem is fixed......................... -
The official Challenger 2020 Division I round 3 thread.
ksateaaa23 replied to marco.is.not.80's topic in HWBOT Competitions
still not fixed. what i mean is for each stage top 5 scores should be awarded points for the stage. for the geekbench 4 stage, no one is getting points for that particular stage. i should get 50 for that stage of geekbench4, which i am not getting. if you check the awarded points there is no name against those points. pls.check. (what i was trying to say is that I should get the maximum points either for the stage or overall standing for the division. overall standing is 5. I should get 39(still not updated because, pcmark 7 score submitted today). geekbench 4 score was submitted last week. for that stage i should have got 50 points. ) -
The official Challenger 2020 Division I round 3 thread.
ksateaaa23 replied to marco.is.not.80's topic in HWBOT Competitions
-
This update and patch fixed the problem. solution from geekbench forum: http://support.primatelabs.com/discussions/geekbench/60208-winhttpsendrequest-failed-error_winhttp_secure_failure 4 Posted by hostile on Sep 08, 2020 @ 02:23 AM Hello, Windows 7 in some cases still uses TLS1.0 with is denied by the server browser.geekbench.com. You can fix that (you want Windows 7 to use TLS1.1 or TLS1.2). 1. Make sure you have KB3140245 installed. 2. Run MicrosoftEasyFix51044.msi (download from Microsoft) 3. Run Geekbench again. At least that worked for me. My source of help: https://www.ryadel.com/en/enable-tls-1-1-1-2-windows-7-8-os-regedit-patch-download/
-
The official HWBot Team Cup 2020 3DMASH-UP thread.
ksateaaa23 replied to MaddMutt's topic in HWBOT Competitions
i will rerun the bench with windows 10. win 10 is giving valid results...... -
The official HWBot Team Cup 2020 3DMASH-UP thread.
ksateaaa23 replied to MaddMutt's topic in HWBOT Competitions
"can you check why the FM link result is hidden". I have two fm accounts one is old with kodukula76 and other with steam kodukula_kumar. i might have validated on both accounts. hence one of the result might be hidden. still i have another fm link. https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23221008 oops! that's not the reason. if i am logged in i can see the result otherwise it's hidden............... -
The official HWBot Team Cup 2020 3DMASH-UP thread.
ksateaaa23 replied to MaddMutt's topic in HWBOT Competitions
Software purchased by me for benching........ 1. 3d mark 11 2. 3d mark 3. VR mark 4. Catzilla 5. Geek bench 3 6. Geekbench 4 7. Passmark performance test 8. Pcmark 10 etc... I think most of us do support developers...... Edit: forgot Time spy.... Can't remember all....at a time..... -
The official HWBot Team Cup 2020 3DMASH-UP thread.
ksateaaa23 replied to MaddMutt's topic in HWBOT Competitions
unigine super position 8k score validation issue: have a datafile but error 1117 while submitting the score, asking for valid license. do we really need to buy the license??? -
Instead of top two scores only top score is considered. Three teams have 2 or more scores.......
-
ksateaaa23 - Pentium G3258 @ 4872MHz - 7sec 781ms SuperPi - 1M
ksateaaa23 replied to redux's topic in Result Discussions
couple of quick improvement scores for both spi 1m & 32m. can do better with ram & little headroom for clocks as well. https://hwbot.org/submission/4495346_ksateaaa23_superpi___1m_pentium_g3258_7sec_594ms https://hwbot.org/submission/4495347_ksateaaa23_superpi___32m_pentium_g3258_6min_22sec_172ms -
ksateaaa23 - Pentium G3258 @ 4872MHz - 7sec 781ms SuperPi - 1M
ksateaaa23 replied to redux's topic in Result Discussions
Oops! That's 32m screenshot. Pls. remove sub. Can re-run. G3258 setup is still on the bench will improve this score tomorrow. -
ksateaaa23 - Core i3 6320 @ 4000MHz - 775 marks XTU
ksateaaa23 replied to speed.fastest's topic in Result Discussions
thanks but new version which scored much better than previous versions and subsequently points are removed from the bench permanently........... -
waltstoy - GeForce GTX 1080 - 12sec 795ms GPUPI - 1B
ksateaaa23 replied to ksateaaa23's topic in Result Discussions
Pls. Submit in correct category. -
waltstoy - GeForce GTX 1080 - 12sec 795ms GPUPI - 1B
ksateaaa23 posted a topic in Result Discussions
GPU pi v3.3