Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

der8auer

Administrators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3683

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

 Content Type 

Everything posted by der8auer

  1. der8auer
    ah damn wrong picture haha let me fix that
  2. der8auer

    Part out....

    der8auer replied to Doug2507's topic in Sold

    I take the 2x Xeon L3014 if still available
  3. der8auer
    Thx for sharing man
  4. der8auer
    Happy birthday
  5. der8auer
    We already discussed this with Vlad and no issue here Just DC2 with XOC BIOS.
  6. der8auer
    I put liquid tape everywhere on the board and on the sticks to prevent water to go underneath the ICs.
  7. der8auer
    dayum! nice man
  8. der8auer
    I don't even have the hardware yet to participate haha
  9. der8auer
    Much better for me in case I make it
  10. der8auer
    Frequency line is okay
  11. der8auer
    pasi@futuremark.com The time measurement error occurs if the system is getting unstable during verification.
  12. der8auer
    Looking for a good CPU for a friend. Has to be a decent clocker. Best would be if you have Prime95 stuff since he is just clocking on air/water.
  13. der8auer
    Cool review! Nice pictures aswell
  14. der8auer
    Will help you via PM
  15. der8auer
    For XTU check this post: http://forum.hwbot.org/showpost.php?p=328768&postcount=111 As long as your result is like the first picture you are safe. Just not sure yet how we can solve the 0 GHz and 4565354325 GHz results.
  16. der8auer
    Great result man!
  17. der8auer
    Something between 1,25 and 1,35 should be fine for 0.95 Volt rail on LN2. Just check how it moves your black-screen.
  18. der8auer
    What about all BIOS settings @ stock?
  19. der8auer
    Did you apply any tweaks to the OS? Like disabling services?
  20. der8auer
    Okay so the question is how we can get rid of the 0 GHz and 42424125125 GHZ results. Let me know if you have any idea what causes this. At my setup everything works fine so far.
  21. der8auer
    Yea you and Dancop seem to have this issue with the strange values. I think it's a windows related issue or due to disabled services. Can't be hardware since other guys also use the Maximus VII Formula with the same BIOS version and it works.
  22. der8auer
    Yes, we are discussing this internally at the moment
  23. der8auer
    Your line is almost straight which is okays. No bumps visible. However Max CPU 0 is strange.
  24. der8auer
    Alright guys, the tweak is actually easy to detect. First let's take a look at XAs result which is valid. I marked the mandatory and important validation details. This stuff has to be visible! Otherwise your result might be considered as invalid. Maximum Processor Frequency is 5.11 GHz. All monitoring data on the right is correct and visible (Max turbo Boost freq ~5.0 GHz). The monitoring data is fully visible on the right with also 5.11 GHz core and ~5.0 GHz cache. The monitoring line on the left is also fully visible and the CPU Frequency is a straight line without peaks. Lets take a look at example screenshot #1 which would be invalid: Monitoring details are not available and also system details on the right are missing. Example #2 with applied "tweak" The Maximum Processor Frequency is out of line with 5.32 GHz (Maximum allowed is 5.11). Take a look at the Processor frequency line which has two peaks (bumps from 5.0 to 5.3 GHz) which cause the wrong result. Also the details on the right are not visible. This is invalid aswell. So the tweak is very easy to spot and we can just continue here. However: - Your result has to show the correct Maximum Processor Frequency - Details on the right have to be visible - Monitoring data has to be fully visible and a straight line without peaks.
  25. der8auer
    That's why it should be called Internet Destroyer. Just switch to FireFox or Chrome
×
×
  • Create New...