Massman

Wasn't that obvious then?

I iz cheatah?

I just found a screen from my pretesting back. It certainly looks like it's going to be an awesome setup!

Just warming up, nothing big yet. Sorry for not having a score, but the efficiency wasn't okay so I didn't want to post. Soon I will see how things go on liquid nitrogen, maybe even on memory too. Can't wait to see what this setup REALLY is capable of!

How does 'discussing a result' have anything to do with me 'not removing a result'?

Can you make a picture of the GPU core?

I can not remove them "as well" since I haven't removed any to begin with.

It's not a double standard. It's a legit question.

It's added to the specific pifast benchmark rules

Whoaaah!!

Haha ... funny wordplay 1Day Or not. Uh-oh.

I maxed nothing out. I was totally pissed about the setup: CPU: 5.7G GTs, 5.5G CTs 3/4 GTX480S: 1000/1050 (-100°C), no 1100 possible at any voltage, any temperature. I'll re-run it once the better CPU arrives here

Tried again yesterday and threw the setup out of the window. This board is not build for (Massman's) overclocking.

It has been. Cards were totally shit on LN2 ... needed -100°C for 1GHz stable ... and in the end, I got a 60k score and the system hardfroze when saving

Then we will have to settle with anything that comes close to a girl. Mister Beier, where are you?

Since I've received quite a bit of questions about this: a sticky! Background: To understand why sometimes your scores do not recieve a ranking or points, it's important to know how the engine works exactly. In essence, our HWBOINT engine is programmed only to recalculate the scores that will be receiving points in the first place. This means that it will not check submissions that the engine believes will not get a ranking, mostly because the user already has a better submission in that category. If you submit a new score, the following happens: - user fills in all correct details - user clicks submit - engine checks if the score is the user's best in the global category - engine checks if the score is the user's best in the hardware category If the answer is yes on either of the last two questions, the engine will recalculate the entire global and/or hardware ranking and will determine what rank, and points, should be given to the score. Normally, this is never a problem for the engine. No rank/points, why? Sometimes a score that should receive points, doesn't receive any. This is because the engine doesn't know (hasn't logged) that this score should receive a rank. As long as the engine isn't instructed to check the rank/points for this score, it will not give any. The reason for this can be: - You have a better score with the same hardware - You have edit a score to a better result - You have submit a score in the wrong category - Two scores are worth exactly the same (*) The main cause of problems is people who are editing results. If you want everything to go well, you need to submit new scores instead of editing older ones. (*): in this case, the points HAVE BEEN calculated and are added to the team total, just not the personal total. This issue can only be solved with patience: until one of your scores has dropped/raised in points, none of them will be seen by the engine as 'best scoring submission for this global benchmark'. The solution. Most of the problems can be solved by doing two things: 1) Force the engine to go over all your scores and flag those that will need to be recalculated - go to your profile and click on the 'options' tab - click on 'Force recalculation of best submissions.' The engine will log all scores that need to be re-evaluated and when the next rank/points calculation is triggered, your points will be added. 2) Force the engine to recalculate a particular score to be re-evaluated and be given rank/points accordingly - go to the particular score and click on the 'more' tab - click on the small calculator image. This will trigger the rank/point calculation. Note: clicking this will make ALL logged scores to be recalculated, not just this particular one.

Not going all the way on the first date, saving up the best for later? You're such a gentleman!

An overclocker's photo on GIGABYTE's webpage? Maybe it's time for a girls-only limitation

Of course, one needs to use the '=' symbol for propper marketing

Shouldn't that be df(x)=0 ? Other than that ... I was actually impressed

Wow ... this is pretty amazing!

Board doesn't look really healthy anymore, though/

Thought the 875K was dead. It's not. Hooking up Phase-Change. SuperPI ruins my weekend. Again. I love you, Gigabyte!

First test for me:

Excellent!