xoqolatl

Instead of all moving to Gigabyte we should push Asus to make a proper bios

From ryba's and mine testing it looks like MSI < ASUS < Gigabyte in '01, and the same in pi 32m, but with less difference between Gigabyte and Asus. I tried the UD7 for a brief moment, but could not bare its retarded, laggy BIOS... Also, looks like Intel is slower than Asus but faster than MSI, and it doesn't have an EFI bios.

You can't get Brazos boards anywhere except maybe Taiwan, and AMD is holding press samples until a new driver comes.

No, until they fix it and fix the ORB. BTW, check out PCMark05 validation links - most of them don't display subtest scores now.

Thank you and thanks to Benchtec for motivation Not maxed yet of course, CPU is a dud.

Awesome! GoodRAM power

Yes for mobo info on submission page, yes for CPU-Z mobo tab on selected benchmarks. I don't think we need mobo tab for CPU-Z, 3DMark Vantage, 3DMark06... just for SuperPi and maybe 3dm01.

I guess the problem is with core count getting more and more blurred. HT is an investment in die area that does not increase core count but increases performance. Next gen AMD CPUs have something opposite - decrease of die area (per 2 cores) enabling higher core counts. Core count based rankings will be even more Intel-biased then, unless we count bulldozer modules as cores (which is wrong) or logical cores as cores (which is also wrong) or base our rankings on thread count instead of core count (which will unleash a storm of whining and outrage).

I knew you would ask, so I included an ORB link It's 154 MB/s. I didn't have the problems you guys had, I was getting such high scores consistently. Maybe it's because I used a dedicated RAID controller instead of SB?

Thanks guys I haven't had that much fun with overclocking since a looong time. Judging by how much power was left in my setup I was sure someone would pull a 17k backup in the last minutes....

Another compo with entry cost higher than the best prize. <goes back to his Sempron 140 rig>

Pics (screen and frost) or it didn't happen

RemiKo is using a Vertex 2 PRO drive - this is not your regular Vertex 2. It's much more expensive and much faster. I tried regular Vertex 2 60 GB - it did around 90 MB/s in XP Startup.

That GPU clock is insane for air cooling Good job!

Excellent score!

Indonesian, not Polish. The flags are similar, I know

And what will prevent them from pretending it's a legit result with a random piece of hardware and submitting it in amateur league? It smells like another F1OC fail.

Congrats on the milestone Next stop: 150k before Sandy Bridge arrives

Thanks guys

Yes - mostly because L1 and L2 caches run at core speed

Awesome clock with just dice

It can do much more, but Regor IMC is holding me back: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1011665_g.foyle_maxxmem_ddr3_875_marks

That was quick, my style

He already won? I thought there would be some kind of announcement...

rickss - My '03 scores are a product of two days re-running the same bench again and again... I was working and taking a break every 5 minutes to click "Benchmark" again. There was no "easy and quick dialing". And 3dm01 is very easy since you can run single test instead of the whole benchmark. Play with us, you'll see it's very easy Now '06 is going to be hard...