TerraRaptor

Hello Eugeniy.Long time no see) This is not my best too - so let the battle begin)

Don't look at time to first error. Use memtest and look at total number of errors after 100% test. Again, some chips are just not designed to work at high frequency. Please check if your sticks are single sided? If YES then you most probably have infineon chips (ce ones?) - they don't like high voltage, don't go over 215-230 Mhz even with relaxed timings but can do nice CL2 3-2-7 @ app.215Mhz. then you need to lower your RAM clocks but with better timings.

pic of chips? I think these are just crap ones (tccc or smth like that) on jedec pcb (which also plays role). Regarding voltage as far as i remember - only hynix d5/d43 and winbonds (and probably mosel) liked high voltage. Microns liked something like 3v, SECs liked something like 2.7-2.8.

I tried up to 2.3v on Transcend Axeram CFR - it becomes noticably worse after 2.15v even for validation on air.

Nice one, Vladimir.

check this with any good freight company - they should have rates for domestic/international delivery for a given weight/volume/dims/destination.

Where can i buy such adapter?

fixed

Good for water. Any LN2 results?

Thanks Gigio) Bench!t.kz is my first team actually)

not bad for air.

If this is Asus board did you use disable.exe?

good one!

Nice CPU for SS)

Nice one!

Bascom my way to adjust RTLs @M6E is as follows: 1. Set all RTLs & RTL-IOs to desired values iat the same time. (eg. 39/39/40/40 4/4/4/4 - do not change only one parameter). 2. Start adjusting RTL initial value in small steps from 63 to smth like 40 (63, 61, 59 etc) trying to post/train with a given RTL initial value. For my PSC kit @2600 I was able to adjust rtls from 42/42/47/45 4/4/9/7 to 41/41/42/42 4/4/4/4 with RTL initial value of 44. I beleive RTL initial value is a key for successful post.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2454365_swed_hwbot_prime_pentium_g6950_3703.05_primes_per_second Please add this result to top-3 average of stage4 for Kazakhstan.

Thx PJ

Yes, not included in the average.

http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2460039_ - resubmitted by too active user))

Need help with the following result is not included in the list of Kazakhstan contributions to stage 8. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2450366_

no ss here - ban him asap) http://hwbot.org/submission/900248_knopflerbruce_pifast_opteron_1214_36.52_sec

Happy birthday)

I beleive this is caused by PCIE 2.0 - I had certain boost with 3.0.

Grats, very strong!