Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

websmile

Administrators
  • Posts

    5822
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Everything posted by websmile

  1. I tasked Pieter for this question, I fear you are too late though - maybe I am wrong
  2. Small reminder, use the stated benchmark version and sysinfo, especially for stage 2 GPUPI for GPU 2,3x because I saw a lot of older versions lately at competition entries. This is not accpted anymore and upload of file will fail most likely anyway with older version
  3. fixed - nächstes mal rechts oben editieren nehmen, das öffnet die Option das Ergebnis zu ändern
  4. Way below 1,3v, I also needed less than 1,35v for 3600 16-16-16-28 1T and around 1,35v for 17-1-7-17-28 1T 3733
  5. Then it makes no sense to use window mode, I would have to block the result for being non default benchmark settings. Try hotkey for oc tools, this often works with profiles
  6. When resolution/benchmark settings are OK at fm link and shown result, I cannot check this anyway and afaik this has no influence on results. This is what I care about, the things I can check, so if you can provide a valid result with running this, it should be ok
  7. OK, I checked top20 preliminarily. For the results I removed with reason "bugged test 1", feel free to contact Christian Ney and offer video proof or appeal the removal, I took in a 2-3% margin for real good tweaking over other results and lucky runs, but when there are 10% over other top and average results with same systems (and these are the only results with this characteristics) I have no choice then to see plausibility check failed at given settings
  8. Achievement "use beaker for xtu sub that will soon be owned by 744" unlocked
  9. Generally verification links are needed for competitions, on fun contests we make exceptions. The problem is if submissions with altered benchmarks settings are posted, I have no choice but to remove them, and I know you plan GOC for example. This is no sarcasm at least from my side, but information that might save you from desaster at future qualifiers
  10. Those french guys, always complaining - you need a better hwstock, I offer nice x38 775 board at mp . We will see if announcement can be made quite early, next stage starts at 28th of october
  11. If the issue still remains for challenge 3, we will make a heads up at rules section or stage rules
  12. Rebench, Franco, the resolution should not give an edge anyway, but 3d11 rules apply also for subtests. After recent incidents we all know that making "own rules" only hurts the game
  13. There is no way to submit atm than bench with internet connection and directly submit. We are working at a fix to make save file and submit work, it is a problem in the program itself, the competition is really helpful to find stuff like this (and others) and improve realbench for the user and future points enabled - Sorry for inconvenience, your feedback is appreciated @meankeys and @Slinky PC Your test 1 results are much too high for the given frequency and system used. I would strongly recommend to re-bench, because these will not stay at the competition for me, I will task these to head of moderation for second check but for me these are invalid - sorry, but plausibility check is part of the game not only for xtu
  14. Sigh, the 3dm11 rules apply for the competition and also for 3dm11 physics, I really wonder why people always change things after their own gusto. It is part of 3dm11 and it should be clear you don´t change settings.
  15. I already explained that we have four stages to cover all possible newer systems including amd. I see no rational reason to prefer sponsored 1700 dollar cpu ocers by allowing 2011-3 on a multi threaded low clock stage because there is no core limitation on this stage. The program is well balanced
  16. You have +1 point, the problem is the ranking is messed up - you are fourth which is also shown but ranked fifth and only get 21 points, same for methol for example. Sigh...
  17. You did hide benchmark settings and resolution by placing result tab in front of it... please check the rules, I am quite sure I sent reason with the block alexmaj467 try recalculation of points at your profile page or recalculate results themselves if this doesn´t change
  18. Submit at eoc sports website, to attach the screenshot that is needed
  19. The listed items are for sale, for more information refer to the item description. 1. Asus Maximus VII Impact Z97 Sample with alu blocks as coolers, working, bulk 2. Asus Maximus VII Impact Z97 Retail with invoice, it is an rma board I bought, I organized an io shield and soundcard if you plan 24/7 use. 4. 4x16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3400 16-16-16-36 1,35v Top notch b-die kit, at 2x16gb easy 3733 17-17-17-35 memtest and spi, benchwise 3733 12-12 and 3866 c12 as well, imc limited on two dimm board. Best 16gb sticks I know of, genuine quad kit, comes with box 5. 2x8GB G.Skill TridentZ 3600 15-15-15-35 1.35v Dual channel kit, tested for specs and for 4133 19-21-21-41 xmp at 1,35v, works, the sticks give me headache because they have boot problems on my MOCF, because of this I sell them cheap, if they show same behaviour at your rig rma them and get 200 euro kit for 100... Last test today worked flawless Prices (shipping comes on top) 1. 125 Euros sold to mr lolz 2. 135 Euros 4. 350 Euros 5. 100 Euros sold Prices are without shipping cost, for a quote send me a pm. Paypal is preferred means of payment, I also accept western union, due to problems atm no bank transfer. I will sell all of my remaining new gen hardware next weeks, so please stay tuned, I will either uopdate the thread or make another one. Disclaimer: Private sale, returns not accepted, I also rule out warranty and all is sold as it is.
×
×
  • Create New...