Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

websmile

Administrators
  • Posts

    5781
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    59

Everything posted by websmile

  1. http://hwbot.org/submission/2637048_ Sure, and you include scores like this and mine is rejected? - 5003 is 5003, which you wrote at several posts, I don´t see below 5003 anywhere P.S. Trollolol
  2. http://hwbot.org/submission/2763678_ What about this valid 5ghz 2500K run at 5003 MHz, Pieter?^^ I don´t see it to be over the cap
  3. Done, valid link makes this a very good and valid result, you´re welcome
  4. How about 32:34? Did this work for you? First test, 6600K, retail ftw on M8Hero, my OS su...and my skills too 6m05,844
  5. If no fm link is provided within the next hours I will block the score, you use win8 and this is a global top 20 score...
  6. Result will get blocked in the evening if FM link won´t be provided Anyway, the screenshot doesn´t show which benchmark was used anyway, please reload another screen where benchmark (FSE) and version are visible
  7. Specs are not too bad, and price as well - have fun
  8. Ask for some samples, AFR are not on retail kits as far as I know - times when manufacturers sold best of brand mems on retail market are long over, today handpicked samples are sent out to a few people for promo and reject ics are used for the retails customer pays for^^ P.S. In general Samsungs seem to be better choice on air because they run higher frequency in average without cold, on cold hymix afr and mfr are better
  9. Test other java versions, maybe this can help your efficiency, a lot on hwbotprime is about right software
  10. I see a bulgarian incoming
  11. I made a preliminary check on results, one sub had to be blocked (explanation was sent), sunday stage ends, so keep on benching Edit I did final, in depth check, two more subs gone, result is final from my side
  12. Payment done, thx for the deal and good luck with further sales
  13. you fail - this is a 6850 Conroe and no E8400 Wolfdale
  14. The problem with your submission remains unsolved - you are right that the stage is restricted to use of i925x/xe chipset, and the fact that you did not include mainboard tab to prove that you used it will force me to remove it from competition - please rebench or look for screen in which the CPUZ mainboard tab is included
  15. You better do not ask XA about reasons for this or you will get a rant that will take three pages here
  16. Please check challenger VII, it shows zero submissions for me and people complain they are unable to submit http://oc-esports.io/#!/round/roadtopro_challenger_season1_division7_round3/2430/superpi_1m Seems problem is solved, so no need to investigate
  17. Why do you want to add same score twice? And why do you leave out mainboard tab? Is it not valid for challenger this way^^ P.S. I think there is something wrong with submission option, I see also no results. I will make a support ticket
  18. What a difference a good board and IMC make - good job on my old 24/7 mems, they are not as bad as you thought first
  19. I know this, and people who ask for removal of scores because of Hwbot rules should know this as well - this is the point, you cannot apply rules of verification for hardwae that is 15 years old and that noone has tools for anymore to verify according to new rules. I opted to ask CN to let a specialist for old hardware do the moderating because either way it will be done, people will complain and I haven´t enough time atm to ban them all
  20. For me it iwould be OK at team cup - but please wait for final confirmation of the grandmaster Pieter
  21. Yes, it will be hard to seperate this. If we follow the rules completely, we will have to remove lots of scores, also new hardware scores where fse screenshots show no subtests for example, in spite of validation link , results wit mem tabs showing no freq and so on. I wonder if any results will be left in the end ^^
×
×
  • Create New...