Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

websmile

Administrators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5822

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

 Content Type 

Everything posted by websmile

  1. websmile
    Not bad, hard work pays off
  2. websmile
    Specs are not too bad, and price as well - have fun
  3. websmile
    Ask for some samples, AFR are not on retail kits as far as I know - times when manufacturers sold best of brand mems on retail market are long over, today handpicked samples are sent out to a few people for promo and reject ics are used for the retails customer pays for^^ P.S. In general Samsungs seem to be better choice on air because they run higher frequency in average without cold, on cold hymix afr and mfr are better
  4. websmile
    Test other java versions, maybe this can help your efficiency, a lot on hwbotprime is about right software
  5. websmile
    I see a bulgarian incoming
  6. websmile
    But only in australia
  7. websmile
    I made a preliminary check on results, one sub had to be blocked (explanation was sent), sunday stage ends, so keep on benching Edit I did final, in depth check, two more subs gone, result is final from my side
  8. websmile
    Payment done, thx for the deal and good luck with further sales
  9. websmile
    you fail - this is a 6850 Conroe and no E8400 Wolfdale
  10. websmile
    The problem with your submission remains unsolved - you are right that the stage is restricted to use of i925x/xe chipset, and the fact that you did not include mainboard tab to prove that you used it will force me to remove it from competition - please rebench or look for screen in which the CPUZ mainboard tab is included
  11. websmile
    You better do not ask XA about reasons for this or you will get a rant that will take three pages here
  12. websmile
    Please check challenger VII, it shows zero submissions for me and people complain they are unable to submit http://oc-esports.io/#!/round/roadtopro_challenger_season1_division7_round3/2430/superpi_1m Seems problem is solved, so no need to investigate
  13. websmile
    Why do you want to add same score twice? And why do you leave out mainboard tab? Is it not valid for challenger this way^^ P.S. I think there is something wrong with submission option, I see also no results. I will make a support ticket
  14. websmile
    What a difference a good board and IMC make - good job on my old 24/7 mems, they are not as bad as you thought first
  15. websmile
    I know this, and people who ask for removal of scores because of Hwbot rules should know this as well - this is the point, you cannot apply rules of verification for hardwae that is 15 years old and that noone has tools for anymore to verify according to new rules. I opted to ask CN to let a specialist for old hardware do the moderating because either way it will be done, people will complain and I haven´t enough time atm to ban them all
  16. websmile
    For me it iwould be OK at team cup - but please wait for final confirmation of the grandmaster Pieter
  17. websmile
    Yes, it will be hard to seperate this. If we follow the rules completely, we will have to remove lots of scores, also new hardware scores where fse screenshots show no subtests for example, in spite of validation link , results wit mem tabs showing no freq and so on. I wonder if any results will be left in the end ^^
  18. websmile
    Experts everywhere - there was a time each amd validation was shown as incorrect and rejected, so I see no reason to remove all these results without someone checking this who knows what is real and what not, preferably someone who is a real expert on this. All I can do is check if results are correct at point or frequency, check if backgrounds are missing on screens and if all tabs needed are there, on CPUZ lots of memory tabs only show memory size for example and no speeds. I will not comment about the choice of benchmarks for the cup this year, but Hardware 10 years or older and new cpuz seem to be an odd combination, and finding early cpuz versions is not easy. I do preliminary check as said and we will see what will be left after someone else made final check^^
  19. websmile
    This is no bug, it is done to raise suspense - I hope will get fixed one day^^ - I checked the amd lowest validation stage, I will not remove rejected validations, if someone is unhappy with this teams should discuss this and find a solution for themselves. I know the AMD issue from past, I also know some people think this is a glitch below 50 MHz, but it is impossible for me to judge what is right and what is wrong^^
  20. websmile
    Should be ok then, latest version - maybe you can check system info if it is newest version and update, I do not use 8 for 05 so it is hard to say what causes the problem
  21. websmile
    Cut windows? XP? Look if you have wmi process cut and if you installed all necessary patches, maybe you have old version of benchmarks
  22. websmile
    deleted at your request - if you want to post a memory score, at submissions page is big button that shows where to submit memory clock and maxmem, directly under button "memory benchmarks"
  23. websmile
    Yes, cpu temps are specified by rules
  24. websmile
    Default ddr3 is 1333c9^^ - my mems run at 1,35v, which is default like 1,65v for ddr3, I think it is comparable this way
  25. websmile
    R5 230 is needed - no 6450 allowed, so please find a way to use a genuine 230
×
×
  • Create New...