Mr.Scott Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Current version is actually 2.01. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Strunkenbold Posted April 6, 2014 Crew Share Posted April 6, 2014 IMO db should be cleared with those old versions. If I remember correctly, there was some discussion about incorrect/cheated results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Most of the guys with old scores have absolutely no fault. I've updated my score and with old version I get 790 vs 710 with same settings and timings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Strunkenbold Posted April 6, 2014 Crew Share Posted April 6, 2014 Thats true, but this is same situation like we had with wprime. Old versions had a major performance advantage. You cant beat those scores even with better clocks. Dont know what would be a fair solution but as maxxmem doesnt receive any points anyway I would say let them disappear... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luebke Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 maybe put the old results in an own section "maxxmem - old" and close it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 A moderator should do a split thread , so we can discuss freely about maxmem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 I don't think that the score split/blocking is worth the effort unless we can somehow guarantee that current/future versions will be consistent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 I don't think it's necessary. Leave it this way. I'm fine with it as long as we all use the latest version for the competition. I don't even run this bench and I wouldn't if it wasn't the competition . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Can you please run with v2.01 (like kotori's run) at these clocks again ? I'm curious to check something . Thanks man and congratulations for your score ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 (edited) I have ran it and the score is about the same. I think his score is bugged What are you getting with similar clocks? Bypass max is wrong here, but everything else is tight enough Edit: btw, expert and venus should be more efficient than ultra-d/sli-d, but I don't think the difference in read and write could be that huge. Edited April 11, 2014 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Honestly mate , i havent made any runs at 260Mhz+ , except some very quick testing at 240-250 just to check the OS and the differences between the versions of this benchmark. I have both expert and ultra-d , so i'll do my best to test them . As for my opinion , kotori's run doesn't seem bugged to me ... but the pattern seems to match with my test runs(done with the expert board at lower clocks as i wrote before) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Hmm, ok. So I will try with Expert, although my board can't clock BH5 very high for some reason. I get sometimes similar read and write, but I thought it is bugged Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.