Lol!

________

group Cams

Edited May 13, 201114 yr by El Gappo

Well, you cannot post someone else's scores of course.

 

sure, but the actual owner of the WR can easily win the competition

sure, but the actual owner of the WR can easily win the competition

 

Team effort and the WR owner for wprime x1 is from xtremelabs

PCmark x1 is from benchtec

 

and nobody has ever bothered to run vantage on an x1 competitively I don't think lol. Records are there to be broken

________

Vaporizer wholesale

Edited May 13, 201114 yr by El Gappo

not need verification screenshot? i want ask massman windows 7 32 bit or 64 bit does xp 32 is better? thanks

and nobody has ever bothered to run vantage on an x1 competitively I don't think lol.

Never say never(ever here) I have runed some vantage x1 to have WR (not for the fastest of course, for the slowest). And I am sure that massman also did some, he is better than me on underclocking.

Team effort and the WR owner for wprime x1 is from xtremelabs

PCmark x1 is from benchtec

 

and nobody has ever bothered to run vantage on an x1 competitively I don't think lol. Records are there to be broken

 

fix'd

PCmark x1 is from evocarlos @ benchtec

If it fits the limitations - yes

Woah! We definitely should come into the game then. Especially concerning my personal deadline failure with GT 220 last month -)

For reference:

 

Stage 1 WR - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1014090_evocarlos_pcmark_2005_celeron_lga775_440_14442_marks

Stage 2 WR - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/979243_nick.ua_wprime_32m_sempron_140_24sec_390ms

Stage 3 WR - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/983388_parcifal_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_9800_gt_6791_marks

 

I'm not 100% sure of the last one, but ... maybe 95%

100 Legit entry :

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1061427_christian_ney_pcmark_2005_pentium_4_630_9196_marks

I think I belive you lol.

________

large tits Webcam

Edited May 13, 201114 yr by El Gappo

Massman

 

How to right apply old results?

Re-submit?

Massman

 

How to right apply old results?

 

Look at my video, even if in my own opinion it shouldn't be allowed

can I resubmit my old score ?

 

If it fits the limitations - yes

 

I mean submit my old WR. If i right understand you, its not a problem?

using old scores

whats the point in the compo?

It's not a problem to submit old results.

 

Do note: exposing your old records might cause other people to want to hunt 'em down and break them

using old scores

whats the point in the compo?

 

To push even harder than before.

Massman thanks for the clarification

 

I try too upgrade my scores in october on semprons 145 )

Edited October 4, 201014 yr by Nick.ua

May be I'll resubmit my old score too

Is it interesting to buy 10 OCZ Vertex 2 ? to break the PCMark05 1xCPU WR ?

on my Asus Commando and 3 additional SATA RAID controlers ?

What can I reach ? ( xxx Mo/s ) on XP stratup

Edited October 4, 201014 yr by Christian Ney

Is it interesting to buy 10 OCZ Vertex 2 ? to break the PCMark05 1xCPU WR ?

on my Asus Commando and 3 additional SATA RAID controlers ?

What can I reach ? ( xxx Mo/s ) on XP stratup

 

xp startup will of course exceed the 220mb/s limit. you'll have to bring it down.

which cpu are you planning to use on the commando?

using old scores

whats the point in the compo?

to find best team's scores & to make new ones if needed -)

IMHO it makes life a little bit easier when competing for fun in multi-stage tasks.

 

p.s. actually don't know the exact reason for this case.

xp startup will of course exceed the 220mb/s limit. you'll have to bring it down.

which cpu are you planning to use on the commando?

 

What is the problem to exceed 220 mo/s ? the objective is to have the better score isn't it ?

 

My P4 630 with HT @ 4.6 Ghz on air

 

 

EDIT1 : Just read the rules OMG, after hardware limited cards, there is benchmark scores limitations LOL. Strange I have seen submissions with a lot more than 220 mo/s (like 275 mo/s and sometimes more).

 

 

EDIT2 :

Okay - I am done with being secretive and want to play with all my cards on the table. So, I have made a video and after you have seen it, you will be able to be as good as me. That is, of course, if you are talented enough for SuperPI32, because after all this benchmark is not about hardware, but it's about the human pushing the buttons!

 

 

I am going to do massman's tweak :

copy big file

recopy big file

another big file

start PCMark05

then the score is : 8mb/s like my very old IBM IDE 4 Go HDD

 

 

EDIT3 : ADVERTISING : ( work for Thor941 again ) I am going to check(and report as i am not a moderator) a lot of PCMark05 results. Be careful. The hunting is open

 

EDIT4 : Hunting closed for today, seems that submissions I have seen with more than 220 mo/s has already been removed. Good to see that cleaning was done before my hunting

Edited October 5, 201014 yr by Christian Ney

What is the problem to exceed 220 mo/s ? the objective is to have the better score isn't it ?

 

My P4 630 with HT @ 4.6 Ghz on air

 

it will be a waste of money since this cpu under air won't beat the pcmark 1xcpu wr for sure.

 

edit: btw. plz edit your posts and don't make 5 posts in a row.

Edited October 5, 201014 yr by Turrican

it will be a waste of money since this cpu under air won't beat the pcmark 1xcpu wr for sure.

 

Is this a challenge you give me, ok, My objective is to break the WR with this CPU right now.

 

 

edit: btw. plz edit your posts and don't make 5 posts in a row.

 

done, sorry, I was on the iphone, now I am back to a computer