SoF Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 lol for sure not - if I would do, it would have been my last time gettin' cpus earlier... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 I don't care which series as long as it does fit in here I don't care if it fits as long as it clocks well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywood Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 lol for sure not - if I would do, it would have been my last time gettin' cpus earlier... ah c'mon! noone is reading this! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoF Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 I prefer to stay safe But I can say we'll see totally different performance on air as ever seen before. Having the same issues you can read around the net but it seems we start to get a step ahead of bios dev's from other brands while learning from intel *insertanenormousmysticalsmilehere* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywood Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 I prefer to stay safe But I can say we'll see totally different performance on air as ever seen before. Having the same issues you can read around the net but it seems we start to get a step ahead of bios dev's from other brands while learning from intel *insertanenormousmysticalsmilehere* Thought so! Never have been looking forward to a new platform more than these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoF Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 took me like 1 hour getting used to it and 6-7 hours straight pre-testing all CPUs....got the impression overclocking never had been so easy before at some point. no messing around with baseclock anymore cuts off quite some trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywood Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 took me like 1 hour getting used to it and 6-7 hours straight pre-testing all CPUs....got the impression overclocking never had been so easy before at some point. no messing around with baseclock anymore cuts off quite some trouble. That reminds me on my first GT experience.... Had 5.8 stable after 15 minutes. Didnt testet on air. LN2 first boot. Killed the first one on the next day.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 27, 2010 Author Share Posted December 27, 2010 took me like 1 hour getting used to it and 6-7 hours straight pre-testing all CPUs....got the impression overclocking never had been so easy before at some point. no messing around with baseclock anymore cuts off quite some trouble. That what you call 'messing around', I call 'optimising' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywood Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 That what you call 'messing around', I call 'optimising' I am not a pro, so i like messing around! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoF Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 (edited) That what you call 'messing around', I call 'optimising' I always liked raw clocks more than optimizing - I always take my hats of when I see guys bringing awesome performance per clock but I don't have time for that mostly I know there is no excuse for my incompetence (uh I must sig that someday as well as albrecht mwhahaha) Edited December 27, 2010 by SoF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 27, 2010 Crew Share Posted December 27, 2010 No more beers for you then !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoF Posted December 28, 2010 Share Posted December 28, 2010 (edited) No more beers for you then !!! I am missing your new sig Uh and yes I think the last one was bad yesterday Man all people around me getting Maximus IV Extreme - I wanna have this board too but it's rather expensive and I speculate z68 will be the better plattform in some time. it's like with h55 and p55 I think. Edited December 28, 2010 by SoF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCesar Posted December 31, 2010 Share Posted December 31, 2010 Z68 chips is rumor or its real??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 31, 2010 Author Share Posted December 31, 2010 Real and possibly not what people think it is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoF Posted December 31, 2010 Share Posted December 31, 2010 Real and possibly not what people think it is that would be pita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew stummerwinter Posted January 3, 2011 Crew Share Posted January 3, 2011 Got a CPU yesterday, first test @ AIR and SS: 50x100@AIR: 50x100@SS: 48x104@SS: vCore under load was always ~ 1,38 V (with DMM)... Saddly I can't exceed 5 GHz, but no difference under SS @ M4E... Don't not have a closer look on the results, was done @ W7 64, by WXP didn't run yesterday... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 3, 2011 Author Share Posted January 3, 2011 Moved to dedicated Sandy subforum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew stummerwinter Posted January 4, 2011 Crew Share Posted January 4, 2011 New BIOS, thanx to ASUS, this on AIR: PiFast: 1M: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankenchrist Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 Anyone else having issues with CPUZ, Core temp etc not showing proper voltages? Am using a GB P67AUD5 MB with a 2600K chip. This chip is a screamer easily hitting 5.4+ on low volts. I am running 24/7 @ 4.15v with LL1 and PP enabled. When I boot into windows my voltage always reads 1.37v on core temp and 1.1v on CPUZ. The voltage never moves while running 8 threads of prime 95 but my temps are climbing to 68-75. I am running a dual 120 rad setup with deltas and a HK3.0 block so my temps should never go that high unless my voltage is climbing but I never see any change in volts in my monitoring programs. Any idea how to get this unstuck? I have swapped BIOS, loaded the new version of CPUZ for sandy bridge and nada. Am I missing a BIOS setting that allows this to change? It makes it hard to keep playing when you do not know where your voltages are. My V-Droop in BIOS is 1.378 when set to 1.415. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 you need to download a beta version of CPUz 1.56.3 what you are seeing is VTT volts right now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.