Crew Sweet Posted January 26, 2009 Crew Share Posted January 26, 2009 (edited) did you check the logfile of the score? 02 Jan 2009 12:26 created Sweet manual online submission 26 Jan 2009 12:31 reported JorJino reported by user due to possible cheat (This result with nvidia physx) 26 Jan 2009 02:18 insufficient verification (crew) NeoForce insufficient verification (PhysX on) Well jmke, Nowhere place, this score is delete ...besides this score it's OK...CPU Score 13800 with PyhsX OFF (with PhysX On Q6600 at 3850 Mhz Cpu +31000) ....see that screen... my new screen in new bench is equal;) No problem, bench always two or three times, but that score is correct, Did you see this CPU score??? , this is my daughter's CPU , but she is not at home Beyond that, jmke I want contact you, how can I do? ? regards my friend and Thx for the info Sw Edited January 26, 2009 by Sweet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted January 26, 2009 Crew Share Posted January 26, 2009 your score has been ok'ed , we've been setting up guidelines for moderating Vantage 3DMark with PhysX on/off to not have these same situations in the future!for contact: always use the HWBot forums; result moderating forum: http://hwbot.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=20 quickest way as there are multiple mods working at the site! Ok. As I wrote before, no problem see you later Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 (edited) I just got a notification that this score blocked : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=818335 I know its a good run , but i can do it again and again . It's fully tweaked wilth almost all tweaks i know . If you calclulate the PP , you'll see that i have : 160K This score ( http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771065 ) has 178K and he's not tweaked at all and at lower fsb & lower dram frequency ... All the other scores in this category is slow i could say. Edited February 6, 2009 by Stelaras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 (edited) Anyone ??? Also , the two top scores with celeron 1.7ghz .. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689544 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1359 They have 170k efficiency and 1st one didn't do maxmem (don't know for other tweaks) ... Also ... with celeron 2.0ghz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=753084 ... 169K http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807658 ... 161K And there are other good scores with 161K efficiency with other celeron s478 runs . My spi is not impossible as demiurg wrote . Edited February 6, 2009 by Stelaras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted February 6, 2009 Crew Share Posted February 6, 2009 hey bro, look again. this was max tweaked, and i did use maxmem FYI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 (edited) hey bro, look again.this was max tweaked, and i did use maxmem FYI Ooops ! Sorry man ... you're right (That 1gb was tricky) But still my score isn't at all impossible . Edited February 6, 2009 by Stelaras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 I'm still waiting for an answer .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 We still have an issue about blocked scores. When the Team Moderators cant see those "blocked scores" ... they cant take part. What's the meaning of emailing the Team Moderators then ? I have wrote the same thing a few times before. Make these scores vissible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 Still no answer .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 (edited) @ Stelaras we need more verification to unblock that score, we'll leave it up to you what form that will take. @ TASOS - Team moderators may not reverse a block, because it has already been reviewed/moderated by a hwbot crew member. The alert at least lets you know a score has been moderated. Edited February 9, 2009 by Maxi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 OK . What verification you want ??? The efficiency can be made and it's easy to check it through other celeron scores (i have posted links in previous post). Check these two : Search results: n/a. SuperPi - 50.69 sec - $lim Ov3r (Total OverClock) - (Celeron s478 2.4Ghz @ 4140mhz on Dice) 4.2 points - [ ] - [ ] n/a. SuperPi - 51.5 sec - Beleno-R&B Team (DimasTech Team - dimastech.com) - (Celeron s478 2.4Ghz @ 3455mhz on Dice) 3.4 points - Explain me the 51.5sec ... Let's say i report it . What yould you do ?? 0.8sec gain from 600 Mhz ... ot 51.5 impossible with 3455 ???? Let's say that 50.69 does not exist . Is still my score so impossible ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 @ TASOS - Team moderators may not reverse a block, because it has already been reviewed/moderated by a hwbot crew member. The alert at least lets you know a score has been moderated. I didnt ask to have the ability of unblocking a score. I just want to have a chance to see ... what's all about. When an e-mail of a blocked score comes ... and i open the link and there's nothing i can see and have an opinion.... then it's useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 It depends on what option the moderator has chosen to block the score. I changed the reason of the block and now you should be able to see it, Tasos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 What do you want me to show ??? Do you want to bench from default (2.4ghz up to 4 ghz) ??? Come on !! Think something that could help the situation . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 No answer .... Here i have two runs just made at default 2.4ghz Ram divider at 3:4 .... BH5 ... with Hipro5 DDR Maximizer . First in not tweaked (only maxmem) ... and second is tweaked (Os/registry) . I'll make the same at 3ghz ... 3.6ghz ... and 4ghz . Check the efficiency ... it's 161K again . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Here are the 3ghz runs ... 1st only maxmem ... 2nd with many tweaks. 160.5K efficiency . That's cause of higher fsb than before AND still on 3:4 divider . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 And here i have runs at 3.4ghz which is the limit of aircooling . I have to mount my cascade or my LN2 pot to run higher. This 3rd run has only maxmem & memset subtimings tweaked And check the efficiency of the 2nd run ... 159.5K . You see ... Only 3.4ghz needed for the 1st place . High FSB & 3:4 divider does it again . What do you think about these scores ??? I bet my life they are real and without cheats . Tomorrow i'll mount the cascade and give you some runs at 3.6 , 3.8 & 4ghz . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 (edited) Runs at 3600 & 3750 Mhz ... 163K efficiency ... Not so good run because i forgot to tweak memset subtimings ... but i'll run it again tomorrow and head for 161K. And here are the 3750 Mhz spi1m with the lower 4:5 divider for comparison ... 1st the not so tweaked .. And the tweaked run : As you can see , the efficiency drops to 165K at the last run cause of the lower divider. Higher fsb (My run at 4100 for example) helps the efficiency to drop again to 161K . If a moderator has any questions regarding the tweaks , i'll more than hapilly answer at PM's . More benches will follow at 4ghz tomorrow . Edited February 10, 2009 by Stelaras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Stelaras We`ve got your point. Could you give us some time to discuss your scores? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 You have PM . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 This is nuts, with all that info it should be unblocked. If not, then what do you have to do to convince anyone that a score is legit? Probably just a lucky CPU/mobo-combo or something. Just like DFI P45 Plus is so wicked fast in 1m. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 11, 2009 Share Posted February 11, 2009 If you want i can upload again a dozen of screenshots !! :D:D Please give me an update when you have . Or ... if there is anything else i can do please inform me . Thanks . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 11, 2009 Share Posted February 11, 2009 Stelaras We have studied your problem and we have decided that it is necessary to recognize your result is valid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted February 11, 2009 Share Posted February 11, 2009 Thanks . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.