Still haven't learned how to take the right screenshots? Or we cheat a little, using non-standard settings.

Rules - https://hwbot.org/rules?referenceId=5186 In ideal conditions, you can also open the settings with the test details.

23 minutes ago, klopcha said:

Still haven't learned how to take the right screenshots? Or we cheat a little, using non-standard settings.

Can't see what's wrong - cpu and display settings visible,.subtest fps also there. Explain please?)

2 hours ago, klopcha said:

cheat a little,

better now?

You real understood rules? Then I wonder how you got rid of the artifacts at higher frequencies?

1 hour ago, klopcha said:

You real understood rules?

I do. So what is exactly wrong?

1 hour ago, klopcha said:

Then I wonder how you got rid of the artifacts at higher frequencies?

You should make vpdd mod (according to MS-8952 schematic - r9250 from MSI - RV280 has a dedicated power circuit for core transform (vdd_ct) and core pll (vpdd) units in gpu. Stock is 1.8v. Raising it up helps to fight artefacts and memory instability. Maximum benchable voltage for vpdd for me was 2.15v, 2.17-2.2v makes freezes in 2D sometimes, 2.25v ends with black screen all the time.  My Palit card also had that voltage source, based on L1117, stock was 1.88v.

 

Benchmark run count was not visible, or "options" or "run" subwindow in 2001 program? I want to know, because i'm a noob in 3Dmarks :) I cant see anything obvious wrong in this screenshot.

2 hours ago, ludek said:

I cant see anything obvious wrong in this screenshot.

Me too. Options field covered by cpu-z doesn't contain ANY settings affecting score (they are - demo looping, demo sounds, game detail level that defaults on low). The only option that is said to affect score (disable title screens between tests) isn't exposed on 3dmark main window. So it is completely safe to say that screensot was fine.

Edit: okay, sorry. Antinomy says that if non-default settings were used (z-buffer depth) 3dmark will notify on that below the total score "non-standard settings were used". Putting cpuz window just below the score could cover that text. Had no idea of that, never touched display settings.

Edited November 12, 20214 yr by TerraRaptor

I see 1 of 7 game tests selected here, installed Omera for advantage.

7 hours ago, liq_met said:

installed Omera for advantage.

Just because its f*cking hard to find old ATI drivers. No extra advantage from Omega once you have ATT or other tweaker.

8 hours ago, liq_met said:

I see 1 of 7 game tests selected here, installed Omera for advantage.

ATT does the same thing. As for 1 out of 7 selected, it's because you rerun car low to get the best possible one 

Nice one @TerraRaptor well done bro 

Edited November 22, 20214 yr by George_o/c

13 hours ago, TerraRaptor said:

Just because its f*cking hard to find old ATI drivers.

LOL ?

@klopcha
How are you to say legendary TerraRaptor to say he is a cheater? What wrong with you?

It's in the human nature to explain things you don't understand with something else - aliens, god, cheaters, etc.

13 hours ago, I.nfraR.ed said:

It's in the human nature to explain things you don't understand with something else - aliens, god, cheaters, etc.

I remember a long time ago when klopcha was an overclocker and a good one. I wonder if we see this ever again.