klopcha Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 Again. Please fix. This user again post wrong result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589040 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. And http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593463 May be blocked user?
Just Learnin' Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 Here to back up my case regarding invalid checksums in wPrime are cases where a screenie would show no problem but the results he posted failed checksum validation: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576572 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576881 So do these scores stand? From my previous post: So screenies in wPrime are ok without validation? Because I have some awesome ones that failed checksum validation! Also wPrime has seperate categories for ES and regular 3.06 chips. Why is the ES chip submitted with the regular 'B' chips?
Massman Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 Again.Please fix. This user again post wrong result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589040 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. And http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593463 May be blocked user? Fixed, not a reason to block the user really
Massman Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 Here to back up my case regarding invalid checksums in wPrime are cases where a screenie would show no problem but the results he posted failed checksum validation: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576572 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576881 So do these scores stand? From my previous post: So screenies in wPrime are ok without validation? Because I have some awesome ones that failed checksum validation! Also wPrime has seperate categories for ES and regular 3.06 chips. Why is the ES chip submitted with the regular 'B' chips? The checksum failing was a problem in the earlier versions. The scores stand We don't make different ES categories, that would just complicate things too much.
Just Learnin' Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 [The checksum failing was a problem in the earlier versions. The scores stand Screenies are good enough in wPrime too?
Massman Posted April 11, 2007 Posted April 11, 2007 [The checksum failing was a problem in the earlier versions. The scores stand Screenies are good enough in wPrime too? No the checksum works perfect now, so we encourage to submit online. It's easier to submit online than to take a picture and upload it and then submit it to our database
klopcha Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 Again.Please fix. This user again post wrong result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589040'>http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589040 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. And http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593463'>http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593463 May be blocked user? Fixed, not a reason to block the user really Are you sure fixed result? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589040 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593463
Gotcha Posted April 13, 2007 Posted April 13, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547659 bad category processor , it's a sempron64 ! (look description and screenshot) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547252 bad category processor , it's a sempron64 ! (look screenshot) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591314 hum , score magic ?!
Massman Posted April 13, 2007 Posted April 13, 2007 I guess it's a score from his 7600gt and 3000+ sempron: http://members.optusnet.com.au/mdice/dfi/3dmark03.png
Just Learnin' Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Prescott CPU in the Northwood SuperPI category also showing at 3200MHz when the screenie shows near 4000MHz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506987 This one has no screenie and says he has an EE ES: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506734 Nothing in his screenie indicates what CPU he has: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576179 Link to screenie in forum post no good http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593954 Screenshot no good: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=520037
klopcha Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 This user again post wrong result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589040 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593463 (Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200 )
Just Learnin' Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 No screenshot: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506060
Gotcha Posted April 16, 2007 Posted April 16, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597041 bad category processor , it's a sempron64 ! (look screenshot) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597039 bad category processor , it's a sempron64 ! (look screenshot)
iL .PoLLo Posted April 16, 2007 Posted April 16, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=596505 There is no cpuz screen...
gianni-gt Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 hi, this is not an amd result: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=595826 gianni
MaXtoRZP Posted April 19, 2007 Posted April 19, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597986 World record on tualatin 1.1 in SPi - 1.26 sec
hipro5 Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 This is with SINGLE 8800GTX......Could someone please fix it?......Thanks guys..... http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?postid=535443#post535443
Febril Posted April 20, 2007 Posted April 20, 2007 Hi... Excuse my english... There is 2 errors: http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=555485#result#result The WR is a Celeron 1000 and not a 850... http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=585563#result#result The WR is a Celeron D 2,53GHz (Prescott) and not a 2.5Ghz Nortwood Thanks......
Recommended Posts