MaXtoRZP Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 So, that's another one. I cannot believe that it's AGP 6200A (64Bit) results I'm running now Mark06 on the 6200A and the HDR\SM3.0 tests are locked (unavialable) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582928 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaXtoRZP Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 Hello, i think there is not 6200A result: The TurboCache Technology is for PCI-E only as i know or i'm not right? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594133 Another one, can't see any screenies: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587907 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaXtoRZP Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 Once again That's not a E2160, it's E6300: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607152 And here we can't see any CPU-z or other one CPUID, only result's log of SPI http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609982 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610753 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610730 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Please fixed result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556438 Result on Savage4 Pro, but category is S3 S8 Nitro. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=564244 The screenshot is not readable. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609587 In a screenshot there is no mention of a videocard. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555209 In a screenshot there is no mention of a videocard. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=507644 Result on FX5200Ultra, but category is FX5200. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600237 User change default adjustments 3D Mark: 800x600, 16 bit color. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562328 No link, no screenshot. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573724 User change default adjustments 3D Mark: 640x480, 16 bit color. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560343 and http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547180 have Identical verification link. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573734 User change default adjustments 3D Mark: 640x480, 16 bit color. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573729 User change default adjustments 3D Mark: 640x480, 16 bit color. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587736 Link fake http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611267 In a screenshot there is no mention of a videocard. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604378 In a screenshot there is no mention of a videocard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Interesting report klopcha, I like your style of repoting here on the forums rather than via the DB. Results missing certain details will not be blocked at this time, however the changed default settings results are of course not vaild (I'm sure OPP just missed the detail when he was collecting old scores to submit). The other reported scores have been moderated or edited as necessary. Thanks again, maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonsond Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Hello everyone. Here is a way too high away from something real result in 2003 mark on a Radeon 9250 SE - http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607651 . This video, even if 128-bit, simply CAN'T get such a score, even on a quad core with VMs. Please, fix it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=545749 32k in 3dmark03 on single 7900gs clocked at only 698/856mhz and A64 cpu? This result has been verified as correct by a moderator but I'm sure it's a bugged run. Score too high for single card and too low for SLI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonsond Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 sorry, what about that 9250? it's not such a problem for me of course, but it's a bit unfair that i can't get a WR cuz' of that fake result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcha Posted June 16, 2007 Share Posted June 16, 2007 bad category , it's sempron64 2800+ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612228 bad category , it's sempron64 2800+ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612232 No url for validation , and score "magic" ? compare with other GeForce 6100 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612756 No url for validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562868 No url for validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562225 No url for validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566893 thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smile-777 Posted June 16, 2007 Share Posted June 16, 2007 bad category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561736 It is not Cel 2.1 I'm sure it's a cel 2.13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcha Posted June 18, 2007 Share Posted June 18, 2007 bad category , it's sempron64 2800+ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612228 bad category , it's sempron64 2800+ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612232 No url for validation , and score "magic" ? compare with other GeForce 6100 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612756 No url for validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562868 No url for validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562225 No url for validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566893 thx up ?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcha Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 fake ! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614870 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcha Posted June 22, 2007 Share Posted June 22, 2007 it's config BI-CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599282 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599281 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcha Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 bad category , it's sempron64 2800+ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616068 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcha Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 bad category , it's sempron64 2800+ http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=616071 again duster, repost in sempron2800+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted June 29, 2007 Crew Share Posted June 29, 2007 hi this guy submitted results for a pentium 2 233 in the pentium 233mmx category please move it in the right category. thanks pi-fast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617395 cpu-z http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617393 super-pi http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617401 wprime32m http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617402 wprime1024m http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617405 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted June 30, 2007 Crew Share Posted June 30, 2007 ähhm, anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcha Posted June 30, 2007 Share Posted June 30, 2007 it's config BI-CPU "Pentium 3 1.0Ghz Coppermine" http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599282 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599281 -------- bad category , move to "Sempron 2800+ Palermo" http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=616071 again duster's, repost in sempron2800+ ------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted June 30, 2007 Share Posted June 30, 2007 I'll have a look a the topic this evening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted June 30, 2007 Share Posted June 30, 2007 it's config BI-CPU "Pentium 3 1.0Ghz Coppermine" http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599282 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599281 -------- bad category , move to "Sempron 2800+ Palermo" http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=616071 again duster's, repost in sempron2800+ ------- First two: no option to split the Dual and single cpu, yet. It's a little harder to implent then we thought it would be. Last: blocked: no cpu-z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted June 30, 2007 Share Posted June 30, 2007 hi this guy submitted results for a pentium 2 233 in the pentium 233mmx category please move it in the right category. thanks pi-fast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617395 cpu-z http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617393 super-pi http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617401 wprime32m http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617402 wprime1024m http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617405 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 I have Problems with much hwbot links my CPU´s are in the wrong kategorie i have all cpu´s at Pentium 4 Socket 478 and the results in Socket 423 can you fix it need you the links ? Username: Bwanasoft - Crazy-OC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 The links would be very useful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 I think that this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612328 Aqua score has TOO HIGH CPU score for ONLY 5026MHz.... It's one of our boys and I think that he didn't do it in purpose....Maybe a bugged run?......Check it out.... I have report it too but it seems that the report file doesn't work anymore!... It whould be better at least the top 5 not to say the top 10 Aquamark scores to upload as "verification link" the data file which is prodused by Aquamark after the bench ends.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 the Results are Pentium 4 Socket 478 - please fix it http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616168 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615841 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615151 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614985 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615890 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615842 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616455 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616166 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616191 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616171 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615891 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615865 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615296 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615137 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616454 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616457 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616195 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616208 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616472 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616126 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614984 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614989 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts