Submission & member moderation

Hey There, I have done a re submission HERE as my previous ones didnt follow the rules, as i didnt have the results text showing (error on my part being new at the time). So due to my OLD ONE i dont think it's realising it as my best score. I have tried hitting the delete button but to no avail. Cheers Edit - I also have a laptop with an AMD chip in and now i have caught the OC bug i would to have a go with that. Although it seems the CPU A8-3550MX isnt listed so i'm not sure what needs to be done here.

There are a few nVidia 6800 categories that are split into NV41 and NV42 silicon rankings In short, verification sucks. Depending on software choice, I can show one card as either NV41 or NV42. The difference is only in the MHz and there's no way to say if a user has OC'd the card to its full potential Examples: http://hwbot.org/submission/2379386_meiyo_3dmark03_geforce_6800_xt_ddr1_%28nv41%29_7535_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/2269305_delicious_cake_3dmark03_geforce_6800_xt_ddr1_%28nv42%29_13467_marks Please can NV 41 and NV42 categories be combined for the 6800GS and 6800XT models that are split in this way? (personally.... I do not see t…

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm05/5503034 http://hwbot.org/submission/2447788_doug2507_3dmark05_geforce_gtx_780_3581298_marks?recalculate=true ...eh.....good score? FLOL! No idea how this came about and i can guarantee i've not cheated in any way. Let me know if you need any dump logs, screens etc etc to show what's running before i shut it down. I'm obviously not expecting this to stand but nice never the less!

Hi, I'm getting the following error when trying to update my PCMark07 scores.... Validation error: A valid futuremark compare url is required if want to reach the PCMark7 Hall Of fame. As only 14 benchmark scores are better than you, you need to provide additional verification. URL: http://www.3dmark.com/pcm7/737903 SS:

Whilst overclocking my 7990, I was noticing no matter how hard I tried, I could not get mine even close to the scores posted in the 3dmark 11 section. Apon closer inspection of the world record holder, I noticed his submission screen shot stated that tessellation setting was modified. I verified this buy forcing tessellation off and matching his clock settings, I achieved a score extremely close to his. I inspected all the other scores, and noticed they did not post Screenshots with a web browser open showing the score was VALID. I will contest that, at least to the best of my knowledge, all of the scores posted in the 3dmark 11 section of the Radeon HD 7990 were submi…

I'm pretty new to HWBOT and I have to say I think I'm becoming an overclocking addict, lol. That said, I just tried to submit my score for 3DMark Vantage. After I submit it thinks about it for about 20 seconds and returns an HTTP 400 Bad request. Of course I tried a few times so I'm wondering if there's an issue on HWBOT's side or it me. Other submissions with other tools haven't done this to me yet... Thanks...

Hi There, Hopefully this is in the right place as i'm still navigating the site/forums a bit (if not my apologies). I picked up a i3 4340 for pratcice purposes and turns out some ok points to be had also. The issue i seem to have is i can logged/submit my score but it doesn't show on the rankings. There is one other showing for Pi 32M but thats it. When i click on best i3 4340 submission i get the cute little robot showing up. Any ideas? HERE is the sub (same for 1M). And cute robot,

Guay, I wonder, if the MSI Achievements does not work - or if it is my mobo not recognized as MSI mobo?! IN the Achievements I see this: So, that sounds good, is not it? I have a MSI mobo - old MSI PM8M3-V with VIA VIA P4M800 (Pro?) chipset and therefore it will be relatively easy to get this. http://www.msi.com/product/mb/PM8M3-V.html#?div=CPUSupport But wait... how come there is NO progress in this achievement? I already submited some scores - all the LGA 775 scores are made using this mobo and I always entered the mobo into the description, for example: ...but surprisingly, in the results are MSI not mentioned at all?! http://hwbot.org/sub…

Guys, when overclocking or pushing for lowest possible clocks, there are usually plenty of runs, witch differ only by the clocks used. This is IMHO quite normal and one could save most of the time by just choosing the prepopulated hardware values from previous submissions... Or so I thought. But I was wrong! No-one can do that, because the GPU clocks are LOCKED and cannot be altered from the previous submission prepopulatd fields...! And I done some quite similar submissions: ...witch should not require re-entering all the HW over and over again (XTU not work on W2k...)... This is IMHO quite serious limitation and should be fixed ... please.

I am trying to submit a score for 3DMark "Ice Storm Extreme" but I am receiving the following error: "Validation error: A valid futuremark compare url is required if want to reach the 3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Hall Of fame. As only 0 benchmark scores are better than you, you need to provide additional verification." I continue to receive the error when I remove the "www." from the URL. I successfully submitted two other 3DMark scores (one "Ice Storm" and one "Ice Storm Extreme") in the past 24 hours. Here's the link to my results on 3DMark: http://www.3dmark.com/is/905718 I'm afraid that I am very new to HWBot.org and I am unsure how to proceed. Any s…

looking some validation, I found this http://hwbot.org/submission/2431313_chris_666_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_44671_marks seeing good, I realized that the SM3 Score is very high compared with other validations look http://hwbot.org/submission/2413852_kio_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_43678_marks/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2402246_zupernico_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_43180_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/2424573_zzolio_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_45250_marks in all cases occupied a vga and cpu with higher frequencies quite getting a lower score for me is a rare score ,what do you think? bye (sorry for my english, I'm using translator)

I was notified today that someone said there's a problem with one of my recent submissions. This is the one: http://hwbot.org/submission/2427079 I'm not a big PCM05 bencher, since I don't usually have two or more SSDs laying around to put in RAID in order to make a serious attempt at it. So it's possible I may have overlooked something, and if so, let me know and I'll gladly take that into account on future submissions. I assure you any oversight, if there was one, was not intentional. If I were trying to cheat, I'd be posting much better results than that one. (;

Good day all I'm having some issues on one of my submissions... this one: http://hwbot.org/submission/2426792_morphling_superpi___32m_core_i5_4670k_5min_17sec_16ms No matter what, It always don't give me the rank of it, nor the brass cup, or even the points for it Can someone fix this? Thank you André Mesquita

Hi guys, can i use Asus Slow Mode for make my Validation? Can i validate at only multiplier 16x? thanks

So the story is like this i reported this score a few hours ago http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2421813_ingh_pcmark_2005_core_i7_3770k_41462_marks Since in my understanding all scores after 24th October 2012 all PCMark 05 scores should accompany the results.txt file found in the program directory according to the thread here http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=59009 now in retaliation he reported three scores of mine http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2424526_sumonpathak_pcmark_2005_fx_9370_16031_marks http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2295234_sumonpathak_pcmark_2005_athlon_ii_x3_425_12002_marks http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2249808_sumonpathak_pcm…

Just wondering why my 8 core XTU sub not getting points? http://hwbot.org/submission/2422247_dhenzjhen_xtu_xeon_e5_2687w_v2_1582 Thanks, DJ

These are two totally different cpus so shouldn't they be in two different listings in the scoring? The E5-2687W is a 32nm Sandy Bridge xeon 3100/3400 on turbo( all cores) The E5-2687W V2 is a 22nm Ivy Bridge xeon. 3400/3600 on turbo( all cores) Needs to be separated so we have apples to apples comparision. Also so my records aren't destroyed by my good buddy as in here: http://hwbot.org/submission/2378757_ Thanks!

This sub is 1x cpu but it is in the 2x cpu rank even though I submitted it as 1x cpu. http://hwbot.org/submission/2419548_crabby_cinebench_r11.5_pentium_4_550_0.69_points Any idea what I did wrong? I just submitted a Wprime score and it is listed as a 2x cpu sub, what gives? I do not have a dual socket 945pl mb hahaha. http://hwbot.org/submission/2419559_crabby_wprime___32m_pentium_4_550_74sec_78ms

First, sorry to Martix,nothing personal at all and I don't do that to grab my cup back... I think it's result is affected by W8 RTC issue, see the low Physics, vga and cpu clock under mine, same drivers and I used clean and optimized OS (and bunnyextractionty cpu/ram btw). As Martrix is new in enthusiast league and submited before W8 RTC issue was know I think he don't have knowledge to see it's result might be buged and out of the line. http://hwbot.org/submission/2392439_martix_3dmark___fire_strike_extreme_geforce_gtx_660_2508_marks

Is getting the 'unstable' error considered the same as getting the 'error' message in Wprime?, and is it a valid sub? These example subs all say 'unstable' in them. http://hwbot.org/submission/2415146_snegovick_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_1143.6_mpt_score/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2402574_berazde_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_1096.2_mpt_score/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2414830_darklord12_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_1007.8_mpt_score/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2412635_rafa.prebianca_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_968.7_mpt_score/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2356500_electroneng_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_960_mpt_score/ Here is the fourth place entry in that category. It has no 'unstable' error. …

Every time i try to submit any score or bench mark this keeps appearing its driving me Nuts!!! I would be grateful if some one can tell me if this is a site problem or what ever thanks! Failed to convert property value of type java.lang.String to required type java.math.BigDecimal for property cpuoc; nested exception is java.lang.NumberFormatException ????? I am fed up with this sign and end up logging off!!!

Why http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_r11.5/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2048#start=0#interval=20

http://hwbot.org/submission/2374302_ace123_3dmark11___performance_geforce_gtx_660_oem_8838_marks (sorry to ace...nothing personal at all) I am sure I don't need to explain all the problems with it.... but in particular: The result can only be checked if the result ID can be picked out and typed into a browser window...then 3dmark does not report accurate MHz for CPU & GPU. There are a few results with this kind of validation these days. Are they ok?

So Hero (http://forum.hwbot.org/member.php?u=21712) for reasons beyond me has an overclockers.com sig banner thing. My requests that he remove it have fallen on deaf ears. Is this something the General Powers that Be can help with? I'd rather not have him fronting as Overclockers.com when he's actually on Xtreme OC.

I don't think this score is real: http://hwbot.org/submission/2397781_metall_hero_3dmark___fire_strike_extreme_geforce_gtx_560_ti_1112_marks/ Take a look to the subscores.