Jump to content

Submission & member moderation

Discussion on how results should be monitored, discuss doubtfull results, ...

  1. Started by True Monkey,

    There are two Typs of GT 240 in the Kategorie http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_gt_240 The Spezifikation is DDR 3 ....but there are DDR 3 and DDR 5 in it Please check this

  2. Started by tiborrr,

    Hello, the score is very well valid. As you may or may not know, x86 validator has some serious issues with K10.5 chips, many of my validations made with X2 550, X3 720 or X4 955 are 'red crossed'. Please unblock it as soon as possible. Best Regards, Niko

    • 12 replies
    • 1.5k views
  3. Started by steponz,

    http://hwbot.org/community/submission/946248_steponz_wprime_32m_core_i7_920_4sec_437ms Whats wrong with the verification? I did notice it was originally GIF and I switched it to PNG. steponz

    • 9 replies
    • 1k views
  4. Started by LyanXXX,

    Does HWBot allow result without a screenshot? http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/946872_jor3llbrelano_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_27921_marks

    • 3 replies
    • 715 views
  5. Started by rbuass,

    PLease. This score don t give me any global points. http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/947045_rbuass_superpi_core_i5_670_7sec_223ms Are this correct? Thanks in advance

    • 4 replies
    • 930 views
  6. Started by rbuass,

    I dis post 2 results: 941470 #1. wPrime 32m - 2sec 860ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Intel Core i7 980X @5750MHz) no points 941471 #2. wPrime 32m - 2sec 860ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Intel Core i7 980X @5750MHz) no points Valid http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/941471_rbuass_wprime_32m_core_i7_980x_2sec_860ms Invalid http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/941470_rbuass_wprime_32m_core_i7_980x_2sec_860ms The only result considered http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/941464_rbuass_wprime_32m_core_i7_980x_2sec_890ms Please consider my result 2.86 seconds valid. Thanks in advance

    • 3 replies
    • 708 views
  7. Started by stealth,

    @massman, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=942049 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=942048 Same story over and over again, in my profile page it says that two of my submissions require my attention.The user fuzz3l & Kovsk reported my scores in Celeron 420 category,calls me a possible cheater and he doesn't like my superPi window. (see attachment). I can't go through the same thing again and try to prove i am not an elephant.I don't know what else to do than throw this CPU out of the window.This CPU does low efficiency scores. Here is last year's thread: http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2570 I have a faster score than t…

  8. Started by Nosfer@tu,

    Trying to submit results made on Kontron Technology motherboards. 1.Im not allowed to enter Kontron and when doing so it gets named as "No matching hardware found" 2.After saving a popup came - http://www.hwbot.org/editResult.do This was done in IE8 but there was no save button and enter dident help either 3. I dont get points because of this I belive 4. I dont think that the png image is working ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=941029

    • 4 replies
    • 1k views
  9. Started by Bartmasta,

    here: http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/794823_draco_pcmark_2005_8x_core_i7_920_7434_marks no screenshot, link leads to no result found

  10. Started by Bartmasta,

    http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=1771&applicationId=9&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 The Pcmark05 section of 720 BE is filled with submissions that use 4 cores but are marked as 3 cores and these people are getting free global points basically fix please

  11. Started by thebanik,

    First ORB screen doesnt look like IE/FF or any other browser screen I know of, and the ORB screen shows CPU as i7 975 and CPUZ shows CPU as 920.... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/911245_kimandsally_3dmark_2006_geforce_9800_gt_18611_marks

  12. Started by Stelaras,

    http://hwbot.org/community/submission/818338_stelaras_wprime_1024m_celeron_s478_2.4ghz_37min_19sec_470ms?tab=info I have restored the link with the image . Please unblock . Thank you.

    • 2 replies
    • 774 views
  13. When I try to respond on someones result it appears that I am some Madmike from zimbabve ?!?!?!? you can see my post on hichokie new spi 1m result I wrote great result keep on pushing.....Same happen when i comment demios result...Didn't know where to post so I put it here .... hope to solve this problem.... regards...

  14. Started by Fabi,

    I have 395 points, but in country rank , only 380 3. 380.00 Fabi And the rank is not updated to me (only country rank, thats continue 380 points). Please update my points in the country rank. Thanks in advance

    • 2 replies
    • 763 views
  15. Started by varachio,

    pls review and un-flag my below result http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/918228_varachio_3dmark_2005_geforce_9500m_gs_9216_marks I think there is no reason for reporting it... If there is one let me know... Thanks in advance...

  16. Started by rickss69,

    Team mates all around me receiving points for their Clarkdale submissions and I get none? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=942569 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=942469

  17. Started by rbuass,

    I understand Gulftown is not allowed yet, cause it isn t available. But the the benchs was separated by CPU cores (1 core; 2 cores; 3 cores; 4 cores and 6 cores). If its ready in a rev.3, i think there are no problem to allow i7 980X. For exemple, gulftown will compete in a diferent category Wprime (multicore bench), but in the same category global superpi (no multicore bench). Its one a sugestion... I know in a few days it will be available, Your decision will be good for me

    • 2 replies
    • 803 views
  18. Started by rickss69,

    delete

    • 0 replies
    • 773 views
  19. Started by Bartmasta,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=939092&tab=info theres no checksum or screenshot showing the score and I think the score is a bit off so it's invalid

    • 2 replies
    • 822 views
  20. Started by steponz,

    I was able to acheive this time without any cheats. Not sure what to believe... Really make me think that wprime should be removed as a bench. I can replicate and can take video if needed to show the result and what happens. My SS drops 10 to 15 to degrees when I run this and the SS makes a whoosh sound. Very interesting... and haven't seen this happen even when I have had my gulftown up at 5.1ghz with 1.8v vcore..

  21. Started by Brian y.,

    I had some 8800GTs 512 scores that were blocked for lack of subtest in screenshots. I have since linked FM validation. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=935116&popup=true http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=935115&popup=true If these could be updated/verified it would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Brian y.

    • 5 replies
    • 959 views
  22. Started by rbuass,

    I did post this score: 3Dmark 2005 - 42865 marks - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Ati Radeon HD 5870 @1050/1300MHz) And HWBot give me the points, but i am not sure if it can be allowed. Please, if its not allowed, tell me if i need to remove the score (or it will be accepted when Gulftown is allowed), Thanks P.S. i have another scores to post, but i rather to wait your reply to know if its everything all right.

    • 6 replies
    • 760 views
  23. Started by westsider,

    hi guys i have done very good score with 5850 but without validation i cannot validate its impossible ihavent original key and in free version cputest isnt stable can it be still seen as valid or schould i make some score that comes just out of top 20? if not valid please just disable or delete it thanks

    • 2 replies
    • 850 views
  24. Started by icebob,

    Just submitted a 3d01 scores with 1 HD5870 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=939768 But on the hardware rank it says it is not my best score with a 5870. It is in fact my best score. Can somebody explain, maybe I'm getting something wrong. Thx in advance

    • 0 replies
    • 833 views
  25. Was the Windows XP start-up limit raised this year with the new Rev3?