Submission & member moderation

Hello Sorry if this is wrong place to cry about it. I recently tested a Phenom II 945 and posted my results. Tho there is one result without memory tab and the ammount of memory the user has marked 2097152MB DDR2 PC6400 @ 280mhz CL4.0 4-4-12 i used the automated system twice, and theres no change. Can someone please relook this result ? the result itself: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884775 Thank You

here it is: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=905759the screenshot shows 3dmnark vantage not pcmark vantage and it shows it as the #1 for this cpu, something is not right

hi i have posted this CPU-Z's validate of my Q9400 with only one core enable. is it valid or no for the ranking? Thk Polpi_91 P.S. sorry for my bad English

Take a look at this: Andre do not have points for his result, thats ok. Kinpins result is on the 1st place, thats ok, too. But why is the score from masterchorch just in the 3rd positon? The same for Hardware points... Just a note

Hi, I have a score with a Geforce 6600 AGP DDR, and got reported for missing GPU-Z screenie, but back when i made the bench it wasn't required. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600303 AquaMark3 2007-04-26 21:14:22.0 - Ginner: manual online submission 2008-07-19 15:08:06.0 - Ginner: manually modified by owner (Ginner) - reason: AGP series has been added to HWBot 2009-09-23 02:02:15.0 - Doominheart: reported by user due to lack of validation () Rules: have a valid screenshot (see example below): clearly show score, processor in CPU-Z, videocard in GPU-Z (as of 15 may 2008) I wonder why the report was accepted by an admin. Regards Kasper

Would you please check missing entries in the Athlon XP-M 2400+ Thoroughbred class? http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_xp_m_2400_thoroughbred'>http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_xp_m_2400_thoroughbred I submitted entries for: CPUZ PCMark 2005 Pi Fast Super Pi 1M Super Pi 32M WPrime 32M But none of those are showing up on the Athlon XP-M 2400+ Thoroughbred page. http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_xp_m_2400_thoroughbred Funny thing is that at least some of them are showing up on my total point count page...??? Thanks. 10-04-2009

Hello, can you please check this result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=905347 it's to fast for the clock speed and (normal you need 5300MHz+ to get sub. 16s) all results with more speed (not only @W3520 - @all i7) are much slower. Then it is with Win7 which is slower than XP... Thank you Afrokalle

My 9550 score in 3DMark-01, was reported but it is the year 2007, before the new rules, What shall i do? Date sumit > 07-12-2007 Link > http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673104 Regards Sw

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=904520 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=904518 If so let me know asap . Regards: chispy

Hello guys, I just noticed a strange score in HD4890 3dm2k3 category, Please take a look : http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=899141 - No game test details - All of the guys who did more than 83k, was using very high cpu speed, and yet this one only use E8400 @ 4.4Ghz Is this mipmap? or is this legal tweak? Thanks for your help,

I will submit Score with the Xeon E5502 (LGA1366) , he is not in Database ?

They where here a while ago, but now I can't find any ? Who deleted them ?

It appears the two "mobile Athlon XP 1500 and 1800" classes should be combined with the XP-M classes. example: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/mobile_athlon_xp_1500 Look down to the bottom of the Athlon XP list to find the two "Mobile Athlon XP" classes. http://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=4

Hi all, Just wanted to ask more info about one result that has been moderated recently by Massman. I'm talking about this score more exactly: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=899099 The comment of Massman is (I quote): "290MHZ BCLK, bugged????" Since such a Bclk is likely improbable and I don't think I am the only one on earth thinking that, I would like to know what has been decided by the crew concerning this result. Has the user sent you more proof about this result? The user still has HWboints for this submission. Cheers, anvil

ok i run wprime and go to submit, i get the first browser saying it is an old version of wprime please update then the second browser just hangs no matter how long i wait it just hangs. is it because hwbot finally started accepting the new version of wprime or some sort of bug?? i like the newer one but use the older one cuz u wont accept the newer one. also the sisoft sandra version hwbot accepts scores from is so dang hard to find there is now only one place i could find it! even the sandra website will not let you d/l it from there anymore. is there a reason for all these apps being only allowed old versions?? maybe hwbot needs an update? maybe add some new benches?? g…

http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_t2300_1.66ghz Look at that PCmark05 score, maybe I'm on speed, but this is not possible. Nice Photoshop on that nr1 Check other first scores too, no high CPU-z, but all first spots. Please erase this scammer.

this Score (http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884949) is reported - but I cannot edit. I have one Error-Sreen : "Crap. An error happened." what can I do?

Can you please check this: http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=1741&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 First and second place is since a few days the same person (and for first result he got global points and for second hardware points). Thank you

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=899216 Hi, Pleace check this Result, he has use 2 Cores, this is Conform that is cheating. CPU-z-Screen say "Athlon II 440" not "Sempton 140" MFG GUN

Can you just confirm we are still using 1.5 ? I see soooo many results using 2.00 and I get better times with 2.00. Have been reporting them when I see them. Should I not be?

Hello guy's I've got a problem with a obviously cheat score. 3Dmark03 with a 6800 Ultra AGP http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=899103 44333 Points Qx6700 @ 3200 Mhz + 6800 Ultra AGP @ 480/700 aren't possible The other guy's aren't stupid overclocker!! Second Place 169xx Points C2Q QX 9650 @ 3600 Mhz + 6800 Ultra AGP @ 460/600 Third Place 168xx Points C2D E 5200 @ 3200 MHz + 6800 Ultra AGP @ 470/625 Yes he can have more points like the second place (maximum 2000 points) , but NO 20000 Points more !! With ln2 or dice you don't have this results!! For examble I've got with this System ohnly 27k points @ 3Dmark03 27xxx Points …

Keep getting an error when I try to submit this score. What are my options?

Thanks. Delete!

hello i post there is 2 weeks some result on wprime, for the opteron 8354 i get hardware credit because i am the first , but no point for the score why ? thanks

Though I have individually reported the scores as well, but found it so strange that had to create a thread too, For the below mentioned category except for 'http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=885497' all other scores are posted in wrong categoy..... http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_2.8ghz_fsb400