Jump to content

Submission & member moderation

Discussion on how results should be monitored, discuss doubtfull results, ...

  1. Started by anvil,

    Hi guys, I would like to tell you that in my team there are two results that are constantly being scanned by the bot and submitted. Here are the results: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=898720 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=898721 The problem is that those scores are really old and now they do not fit the new submission rules. The first one in this list also do not have a screenshot at all. But in the past he had. What do we do? I can easily contact the auther of the first link but not the second one. Cheers, anvil

  2. I want to submit a result, but the CPUz shows the wrong ratio (correct is 21, but it shows ratio 24). i did try CPUz 1.51, CPUz 1.52, many diferent Bios and always the same. I have a new core i5 750 and i want to post my results. what can i do? thanks

  3. Started by Barton,

    Would one of the mods please clear the "1 item needs attention" from my private profile? The item was addressed last week, but it has not yet been removed. Thanks.

    • 2 replies
    • 698 views
  4. Can you add a new category for this processor? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=897649 Thank you.

  5. There are 2 categories for the same processor Phenom X4 965. How do I know which one of my processor is included, because I did not notice any difference in CPUZ

  6. Started by t0mz0r,

    Morning guys, Just wondering what could be wrong here - I cannot see PCMark Vantage scores on my profile (via /community/user/xxxx), and a search gives no results either. That said, I can find both submission link and find other entries from my country, but not any of mine. Any ideas

    • 0 replies
    • 644 views
  7. Started by Aleslammer,

    I just picked up 2.3 points for a card I didn't bench (8600 GT) was tied to my 280 score. I've deleted entry on my side Was in this CAT, most of the cards are not GTs http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?gpuModelId=1571&applicationId=12&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&sli=false&limit=100

  8. Started by Hondacity,

    i need to delete my 3x 2003 submission, can someone help me out?

  9. Started by stivut,

    Someone on this forum called lelik9 reported one of my submissions, because he thinks that the CPU Score(33584) is too high! But this is absolutely normal score, with PhisX OFF, because I made the test on my Skulltrail (Intel D5400XS) with two cpu's QX9775@4530MHz!!! Watch all of my Vantage submissions, and you'll see! I'm asking one of the administrators to solve this problem as quick as possible! Thank you, and I'm waiting for apologies from dear mr. lelik9!!! Thanks to admins!!! Problem already solved!!! Thanks again!!! Thread closed.

    • 0 replies
    • 660 views
  10. Started by Barton,

    Trophy and points awarded for Sempron 3000+ CPUZ times have been addressed by knopplebruce. http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/sempron_3000_athlon_xp Would you remove the "issues" notices from my personal profile page? And also from the personal profile page for the other party whose number 2 score was temporarily shown in third place rather than second?

    • 0 replies
    • 619 views
  11. Started by Barron_Greenback,

    Hi guys, can somebody tell me why my score from the F1OC has been deleted? Cheers, Rich.

    • 9 replies
    • 1.1k views
  12. Is it same case as AndreYang? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3139 My results link in HWBOT: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=893494&popup=true with screen shot at ORB:

  13. Started by rbuass,

    PLease check the E6500K result, if its possible. I know my memory isn t good (i used the worst memory), but i think that the diference is higger than normal PiFast Hall Of Fame: (view top 100) 893022 1. PiFast - 24.1 sec - Eiswolf93 (PC Games Hardware) - (Core 2 E6500K (2.93... @ 4462mhz on Air) 2.1 points - [ ] 892883 2. PiFast - 27.06 sec - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Core 2 E6500K (2.93... @ 5284mhz ) 1.7 points - [ ] SuperPi Hall Of Fame: (view top 100) 893019 1. SuperPi - 11sec 870ms - Eiswolf93 (PC Games Hardware) - (Core 2 E6500K (2.93... @ 4900mhz on LN2) 2.1 points - [ ] 892884 2. SuperPi - 14sec 730ms - rbuass (Team Adren…

  14. Started by Bartmasta,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=885453 Note that the section is 720 without the BE and the result is a 720 BE. Should be in the 720 BE section and not the 720 one

  15. Started by rbuass,

    HWBot don t add my points Total Points: 478,1 (global points + max(hardware points, 300) ) Global Points: 178,1 Hardware Points: 308,4 (limited to 300 points for total points) and e are no point in this submission 1. CPU-Z - 4648.31 mhz - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Athlon II X2 240 @ 4648mhz) Thanks Sorry the "extra work" and the broken english

    • 5 replies
    • 777 views
  16. Started by mgoode,

    Please add this new mobile GPU to database ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/k4bqf/ Thank you

  17. Started by Splave,

    Should be seperate? Seems the 16sp versions have upgraded ram as well. Please discuss, priority on this should be about 1.5/10 though so dont worry about it too hard keep up the good work guys

  18. I post my scores in a couple of forums, but I guess this is happening with only one forum, Techenclave is the name of the team. I upload my scores manually to hwbot, then a few of them I post on the forum techenclave sometimes. Now these are coming in the global rankings with a new ID, thebanik (Techenclave) and that too ahead of my similar scores that have been submitted manually. I dont think this should be happening in the first place, since my ID exists and I am with some other team, how are they able to use the score??? Now what should I do to remove those scores???? For Eg. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=880663

  19. Started by uncle fester,

    i just benched 4.702sec on wprime 32 with an i7 920 at 5090ghz on ss and 5th place has 4.703 but it has placed me in 6th position ? Is this normal ? ________ MARIJUANA

  20. Please check this , Gigabyte Ati 9550 in 9550 SE group, link spec of Gigabyte 9550 http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/VGA/Products_Spec.aspx?ClassValue=VGA&ProductID=1221&ProductName=GV-R955256D I Think Wrong category, correct are this : http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/Radeon%209550 9550 SE is 64 bits and this 9550 /1050 128 bits, see this screen's please http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884084 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884119 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884120 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884122 and more of this guy Thank's Sw

    • 2 replies
    • 1k views
  21. Please add this new cpu to database Xeon W3550 LGA 1366 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=675255 Thank you.

    • 3 replies
    • 912 views
  22. Started by topdog,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=886852 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=886850

    • 0 replies
    • 717 views
  23. Started by Afrokalle,

    Please Check this result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=888626 User hast more than 200MHz less speed on his CPU but is a lot faster than all others... His result is only possible with a CPU@5400MHz+ and high uncore. Regards Afrokalle

    • 0 replies
    • 739 views
  24. Started by TeamAU,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=887954 I dont want this score to be validated; in fact I posted this score to have a rule changed in PCMARK; Currently PCMARK rules are written to be 'no mft used in conjunction with ssd', I am suggested the rule be changed to 'No MFT or software capable of changing disk performance' as I was using similar products with IRAMS and achieving the exact same result as SSD. Please consider this rule change =)

    • 1 reply
    • 795 views
  25. Started by icebob,

    I just post a score on the PII competition, I have the 2nd best time in spi, but I still have 0 point? How are the points system work in that competition? Sorry if it is the wrong place to post just lemme know and I will post in the right section

    • 4 replies
    • 915 views