Support

Long time ago I wanted this mainborard to be added: http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=87039&highlight=MS-6340 I always mentioned that "it is not terribly clear, witch is the official name of this thing." So it was ended up with the MS-6340 as is the MSI label. Later I wanted adding picture of the mobo there: http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=135499 ...and it was there for long time, before recently go missing. Please add it back ... However with recent Aida64 report, it become clear that the mainboard is in fact a MSI K7TM Pro: "MSI K7M Pro (MS-6340M)/K7TM Pro (MS-6340)" Google search for pictures of "MSI K7TM Pro" confim that: ht…

GA-8AENXP-D http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=1851#ov

Please check challenger VII, it shows zero submissions for me and people complain they are unable to submit http://oc-esports.io/#!/round/roadtopro_challenger_season1_division7_round3/2430/superpi_1m Seems problem is solved, so no need to investigate

Dell Inspiron 3542 Motherboard : 07V3MR Intel HM87 series I want this for the Team Cup 2015 http://hwbot.org/submission/2976423_

del

My SuperPi 32M score (not optimized WinXP, just a test of stability) that I made 7 days ago: http://hwbot.org/submission/2962892_ ...is still not shown up there for the P90 times: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_1__90mhz/ What is wrong with the HWbot update speed? Is not that TOO long? Is there are bug somewhere?

Ñмотреть Демоны джун Ñмотреть фильм демоны джун 2015 Ñмотреть трейлер демоны джун демоны джун june 2014 Смотреть онлайн Демоны джун Демоны джун онлайн демоны джун трейлер Демоны джун Ñмотреть онлайн демоны джун 2015 Ñмотреть онлайн Ñкачать фильм демоны джун Демоны джун Ñмотреть Ñкачать демоны джун через торрент демоны джун 2015г демоны джун 2015г демоны джун 201…

nVidia GTX 750 Ti is represented by no image! http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_gtx_750_ti/ That have to be fixed, so there is the reference image: Not easy to find: http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/176785-nvidias-new-maxwell-powered-gtx-750-ti-is-hyper-efficient-quiet-a-serious-threat-to-amd/4 ...and I would prefer some nice custom designs, but at least that image will do it. Thanks!

Can R5 7400K be added to GPU list, graphics for the A6-7400K. http://www.pc-specs.com/gpu/AMD/APU_Family/Radeon_R5_7400K/2272 Can't find it in the database unless its there somewhere. Thanks!

Please add this MB: 1) ASRock QC5000-ITX/WiFi http://valid.x86.fr/4f2vyh

Oldschool Intel Pentium 100 have a ughly image! http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_1_100mhz/ Fix is need, so there is much nicer image, not perspectively distorted and visibly "used" & not cleaned CPU for it: Thanks! :celebration:

Legendary old AMD K5 PR75 have no image! http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/k5_pr75/ Fix is need, there is nice image for it: Thx! :celebration:

This legendary Asus TUSL2-C board have no image! http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tusl2_c/ That have to be fixed...! Thanks! :battle:

Legendary DDR1 rams have no image! http://hwbot.org/hardware/memory/ddr_sd_ram/ That should be fixed ASAP. But... witch to choose? I choose Adata Vitesta, because: - they are so pretty :celebration: - they win the fastest bandwitch ATM - they are legendary :ws: Hopefully there won't be objections to my choice

I've been trying to submit a PCMark7 score for several days and I keep getting a message that the Futuremark link is invalid, yet I have tried four different links that all appear to be good. http://www.3dmark.com/pcm7/968117 http://www.3dmark.com/pcm7/968115 http://www.3dmark.com/pcm7/967104 http://www.3dmark.com/pcm7/967100 Any insight as to why the links are being rejected? Thanks.

PSU: Premier LC-B300ATX do exist: https://www.google.cz/search?q=Premier+LC-B300ATX&newwindow=1&safe=off&biw=1280&bih=928&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMIjdaN95fFxwIVAhgsCh0M3gId ...so it might be good that HWbot will add that PSU type.

HWbot claims, that the Chaintech 9VJL3 mobo use a VIA PT800 chipset: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/9vjl3/ I would like that to be true, but sadly it is not. According to these infos, the mobo is most definitively NOT using modern PT800 chipset, but suxxking VIA P4X400 one: http://www.motherboard.cz/mb/chaintech/9VJL3.htm http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/big-business,671-12.html http://www.cnet.com/products/chaintech-9vjl3-motherboard-atx-socket-478-p4x400/specs/ Of course, all these sources could be wrong, however when even a manual insist on VIA P4X400 chipset: http://depositfiles.com/files/e3bmb9zqb http://www.mediafire.com/?odkuc80j5c1y4a7 h…

Hello, Corentin3247 passed directly in the league enthusiast before the deadline! Thank you to put him in the Rookie league. http://hwbot.org/user/corentin2347/ Martin White

forgot how to add a forum account (this one) to tapatalk... um...help?

When the popup for participating in the ongoing competitions appear, it show way wrong records to beat: For example: Intel CPU-Z lowest clock: 6798.8MHz? That hardly can be lowest, can it? AMD CPU-Z lowest clock: 4899.73MHz? Nah, not lowest clock either... ...and the rest of the scores require some scrutiny too

Reading the OC results I stumbled on this: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_r9_390x/ AMD Radeon R9 390X is not represented with image? That call for fix: Source: http://www.cnews.cz/sites/default/files/pictures/novinky/2015/06cerven/referencni-provedeni-radeonu-r9-390-a-r9-390x/referencni_provedeni_radeonu_r9_390_a_r9_390x_06.jpg (same image goes for 390 and 390X, as the reference versions did not differ at all...) That should take care of this :celebration:

When checking on the Radeons in general... I noticed that Fury X have no image to represent: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_r9_fury_x/ That must be fixed: Source: http://www.overclockers.ua/video/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x/all/ (impressive Fury X pics!) Org. source: http://www.overclockers.ua/video/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x/09-big-amd-radeon-r9-fury-x.jpg Cleaned up: http://postimg.org/image/6nmibl2ax/ This reference design is very beautifull anyway

Reading some of the results I stumbled upon this: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_r9_290x/ AMD Radeon R9 290X is not represented with image? That have to be fixed: Source: http://images.anandtech.com/galleries/3105/AMDRad_R9_290XStraightOn_RGB_24in.jpg So, sadly we cannot use one of these more "eyes-pleasing" non-reference cards, but still it is looking pretty good to me

Mine lovely (altrought not that much now, when I find out that AMD K5-75 did not post on it at 7.14MHz FSB, unlike my P90 :battle: ) Asus TXP4-X mobo... http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/txp4-x/ ...is lacking a image. So I made one: Thanks! :celebration:

From old Dell OptiPley GX110 I get two one sided, 128MB ram PC133 sticks. On the chips is written Empaq as chip/ram type. Not much else, but I can provide a photo when need... Quick Google search for "Empaq rams! revealed that I'm not alone with Empaq rams: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Empaq-512MB-PC133-VIA-Chipsatz-single-sided-SDRAM-133MHz-168-Pin-DIMM-RAM-/271381301403 http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/sis.html?_nkw=Empaq%20512MB%20PC133%20Via%20Chip%20Set%20Double%20Sided%20SDRAM%20133MHz%20168%20pin%20DIMM%20RAM&_itemId=271426799435 ...and since that type aways disappear when I enter it, I would like that HWbot recognize these Empaq rams... Thank you! :celebratio…