Mr.Scott

We're not hardware sharing are we?

WTG Brian

The only violation I see in those links is no pic of rig.

Steve, no dis-respect intended as you are most certainly a master at this bench, but in the other benches you don't need to basically construct your own OS using pieces of other OS's, or use batch files and sub-routines to switch drives for sub-tests to make them all work together for a decent score. That to me is a lot more than 'tweaking'. Not going on any more about this here. There's another thread for that. Besides, I'm obviously in the minority here anyway so there's no point in beating a dead horse. Enjoy your bench.

Sorry man, but he's an arrogant douchbag.

Ah, but I DO know about it, pretty well actually. I just choose not to bench it. It's no fun, which is why I bench, for fun. As for my points and qualifications, well, I don't recall anyone asking for your opinion of either. They're not the issue anyway, so you wasted your ignorant 15 seconds trolling somebody you don't know from a bag of beans. You must be proud.

I find that sometimes it's best not to poke the hornet's nest. Just do the best you can and hope it sticks around a while. Nice OC BTW.

See post #2. Rivatuner most certainly does report that. Example:

I see you missed the point. Here it is again for you.

Yup.

GPU clock speeds are missing.

It makes room for bigger and better cooling options. Heavily modded board. Really nice work. Me like.

Previously mentioned in posts #408 and #409. Thanks for looking.

Nice job Alex.

I was just gonna say the same thing.

Very nice indeed. You've inspired me to fire up this board again. It's been a year or two.

Thanks Ivan. I can bench it at 3.4 or so on air. I'll have to anyway as this submission was blocked because I covered up the stupid bench settings with a CPU-Z shot. No big deal. I'll run it again.

Ya know, you do an awful lot of complaining about how many points people get and what they get them on. You have the opportunity to cash in on rare and low comp stuff too you know. Just let it go. Stop screwing with the point system, it's already hard enough to keep track of. Only mentioning it because every time one of these threads comes up, you're all over it. Give it a rest.

http://hwbot.org/user/chuckgunz Above user shows on the team but I don't see him or his contributions on my roster. http://hwbot.org/team/classicplatforms.com/#Members

Test failed. PCM04 doesn't like multi cores in the grammar check stage. There are work arounds. Google it.

Understood. We are quite similiar in personality. I do respect your opinion. No harm done. @ Chris- LOL

I know you're an honest guy Alex. You don't have to prove anything. And apparently, I must be outta line for speaking my mind, so I'll just bow out semi gracefully and leave PCM05 to those who bench it.

Don't tell stories Alex. If the staff knew all the tweaks, don't you think they'd be using them for themselves? Also, for the record, I mean no disrespect for those who excel at this bench honestly. But I know for a fact there are a few that aren't so honest. They'll never be caught, because everything is a 'tweak'.

I don't know why you continue to try to make me the bad guy here. I don't care if everybody sits on all their tweaks or not. My point is that if the people who moderate the submissions don't know or understand said tweaks, how can they possibly look at a submission and judge whether it's valid or not if it's reported, when they don't know what to look for. Does that mean if you're the only one who knows said tweak, that they and everybody else have to take your word for it? That's what makes this bench impossible to moderate, and why it should be ditched. Mind you, this is my personal opinion, and I'm entitled to that, like it or not. BTW, loopholes in the rules do not constitute a 'tweak'. Whatever. Do what you want. I don't run it enough to care anymore. EDIT- because I don't care, does that make me more 'ignorant' than just not knowing a tweak?

Then you might as well remove the cap and restrictions and make it a free for all, because it's already un-moderateable with any kind of accuracy when the staff openly admits they can't do it because they don't know all the tweaks. Besides the fact that you have staff skirting the rules now too. That's all I'm saying.