Mr.Scott

Johni, apparently it was my error. My post was more of a friendly note just in case you submitted in the wrong place. I didn't report it or anything. Sorry for the hassle. Note: of course, if we had some updated rules and changes here, it could have been avoided all together, instead of just going off of 'he said this or that'.

http://hwbot.org/blog/wp-content//hwbot-team-cup.jpg

MX400 32MB most certainly is on the list. With all due respect, if it's on the list, is it too much to ask to be put in the proper category?, and if it doesn't matter anymore why are the categories not merged? Would this pertain to all cards of the same series with different memory sizes? No series' have been merged. Link to proof that 'it doesn't matter anymore' please. Lets see somebody put submissions from a 8800GTS 640 in the 8800GTS 320 category since 'it doesn't matter anymore' then. How many people do you think will b1tch?

I asked the very same question. I was told BD is Vision.

Yes.

Your SS says 32mb not 64mb.

Most definitely.

Excellent.

Will do. Very much luck in the cup. We bench quite a bit of similar hardware, I'm sure I'll see you around.

You know better Ivan. The Infineon 7ns ram is where it's at.

It's just my opinion. I haven't reported it. It's a good score but I think without the error it would be a better score. Might want to give it a shot and save it for a backup.

Gonna play devil's advocate here. How can you say the score is good, when you know the program errored? The iteration count is wrong, how can you be sure that the computations are correct? I don't care either way, but the score should be dis-allowed. It's no different than getting the error on Wprime even though the bench finished, and that's not allowed.

I know. It was a general statement because now you know he's looking for stuff to report. There's always a boomerang effect of some sort.

Prepare for the onslaught of reported submissions from 2007.

Yes, that's right.

Because the program errored. Question should be, does this invalidate your run?

How did you get the 97.44 driver to work on this card? The card is unsupported. It won't install.

CP is down almost 700. I'm sure it's UP bug related as it almost matches what I'm down on UP.

No competition backround. Run it again homie.

My mistake.I mistook Vision for Fusion and assumed it was just the APU's. I'll just shut up now. Always a pleasure EGM. Stop around more often.

Good run Jon.

Zambezi is not 'Vision' bro.

+1

lol You're a patient man Frank. WTG.

http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=177774&postcount=20