Mr.Scott

2596 XP startup? Hahahaha

Nice.

There's another method. That's not the only one.

Yup, still the same old Steve. Over dramatic and always the victim. Have fun in the sewers homie.

Not interested. Just reported what I noticed that day. Don't feel special, it didn't matter who it was, I'd have done it anyway.

Hello Steve. You wouldn't have opened it if I had sent one. Rules page is a good resource to check once and a while. You know things change rapidly here.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2427014_fr4ncslo_pcmark_2005_fx_8320_0_marks How do you receive a valid FM link and HWB points on an incomplete run? Just another reason for this bench to be retired.

Finally.........the lightbulb is on.

Been away longer than you thought, eh?

I'll help. YGPM

Nice.

Sent.

WTG Frank.

Sent BDC to you at home Frank. If you need help with it lemme know.

K. That's all I wanted to know. Thanks all.

SS is unacceptable per the rules.

Is getting the 'unstable' error considered the same as getting the 'error' message in Wprime?, and is it a valid sub? These example subs all say 'unstable' in them. http://hwbot.org/submission/2415146_snegovick_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_1143.6_mpt_score/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2402574_berazde_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_1096.2_mpt_score/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2414830_darklord12_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_1007.8_mpt_score/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2412635_rafa.prebianca_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_968.7_mpt_score/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2356500_electroneng_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_960_mpt_score/ Here is the fourth place entry in that category. It has no 'unstable' error. http://hwbot.org/submission/2323148_nom_yeslinux_ucbench_2011_fx_6300_977.7_mpt_score/

Tested. Works perfectly. Thanks again.

Awesome. Thanks.

You didn't miss anything.

Absolutely. http://hwbot.org/news/4591_application_33_rules/

320.49 installs fine on my super stripped XP32 OS with just .net 4.0. Might want to check the integrity of your downloaded file.

Nice storage numbers. Ramdisk?

Nice job with this chip.

Ouch.