knopflerbruce

I must say this chip is truly awesome!

It says that you have to use your own HW (except for the parts that can be shared without breaking the rules), and if the CPU was SOLD it's no longer owned by Hiwa.

I've got the impression that this rule isn't very clear - even within the crew:D The rules say something about sharing... if one guy sells one CPU to another user, that's not sharing - that's selling, which is OK. However, if this guy benches it and sells it next week to another member, the whole selling process is not about the sale itself, but to gain more boints - and then we'll look at it as sharing, and start punishing people. I haven't looked into this specific case, but if the new owner keeps it for a few months, I would say it's OK. The most important thing is that it's not tossed around to a whole bunch of members.

Uhm, how? Seling a CPU within a team is definately allowed - and but if the selling process takes a form that looks like HW sharing, it's obvious that it's an attempt to bend the rules.

Selling a CPU within a team is legal, just to point that out. However, if it's "sold" to several members within a team, it's more or less sharing.

...or breaking the rules twice;)

It says so, but I'm quite sure that that punishment was written down when things we were all shocked about this way of cheating. We give photoshoppers a second chance, people who share CPUs/GPUs, mipmap'ers - the same goes for them. I don't see why this case is so much worse that banning FOR LIFE is a proper punishment. Just my 2 cents.

...ebay? Or what about your local dump site:D I like these old school competitons - it's already waaaaaaaaaaay too much about the cutting edge parts. I'm surprised my FX53 run got so much attention - I expected 6-7 "well done, keep pushing"-posts at most - if this had been back when these chips were really hot... HaHa!

What error? All the tabs are there.

Phenom validations are often like this, and it's a bug with CPUZ and not the alidation itself.

This error pops up when you type the whole result in one of the two fields, instead of separating the seconds and the milliseconds

Yeah, I was quite surprised it went so high Maybe with a golden FX55 4.1-4.2 is possible? I have a good one, but it coldbugs... stil did 4044MHz with it.

I guess there's no way chkcpu etc can read actual CPU frequency?

Ticket ID: 943 Priority: High Seems like the engine has problems with the multi socket calculations - for example: http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/wprime_32m/rankings?start=0&cores=2&hardwareTypeId=CPU_1187\r\n\r\nI wonder... where can you find 3 better scores with a single Opteron 2220 SE?

It's probably because someone post in the wrong category, and then it gets moderated. I've seen this on a few of my own scores.

Sounds like mobo issue, yes.

Remove the cooler and write down the stuff Intel put on the heatspreader. With that information it should be possible to figure out what it really is.

Haha, seems as if CPU-World was wrong - this is a 3400+ with 3200+ specs... wtf? Just like this one: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=1603208&page=2 The rules say that you should put it in the category it originally should've been put into, so neither 3200+ nor 3400+ would be 100% correct, as it's not a 3200+ because of the IHS-label, but it's also not a regular 3400+ because of the specs.

Ticket ID: 933 Priority: Low http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Athlon_64_microprocessors#.22ClawHammer.22_.28C0_.26_CG.2C_130_nm.29 - according to this list, there are two different socket 754 clawhammer models, one with 2.4GHz clock speed and 512kb cache, and one with 2.2GHz stock speed and 1mb cache. I have the type that\'s not listed in the database Please add it. I can give you a CPUz screenie if you like.

Sounds better, but how "heavy" would such a program be? Would it crash a superpi1m stable setup?

I'd say high bclk/fsb/htt/whatever on a motherboard would be a good chart to display. Even though other things are important, in most cases (locked CPUs...), high bclk is what matters the most. @Massman, I don't quite get the last post - what sort of ranks are you thinking about?

That must include some HW detection that works 100% flawlessly, not like wprime (in the old days, not sure if it's fixed now), and FM:)

IMO it's a better idea to add boints to the MaxxMEM rank, when it's bugless:)

Use a 24-pin, AFAIK the 24-pin plug is just the original 20 + 4 additional pins. Works on my NF3-board:)

Why don't you just f*ck off instead of continue posting? I mean... you're waiting for your account to be (properly) deleted... hello Einstein, what about the log off button? You don't have to post here just because you have an account, you know;)