knopflerbruce

When people actually realize that this is allowed, they will definately pass these around, at least a little bit. The German scores were a result of that, which is fair enough - rules apply to everyone, and they didn't do anything wrong. Then, if this becomes the norm of every team, send the best CPU of the team to the guys with 4 HD4890's so they can take a record or two, will it still be OK? The problem is that "abuse" is hard to determine. Is it if it's shared between 3 or 4 members - or does it take like 15? Perhaps it's hard to create a rule without making moderating a PITA, but some guidelines about what's fair and what's not wouldn't be so bad If nothing is written down on the subject, any user will have one opinion about what's unfair and what's not.

Hahaha, that one nearly deserves to be sigged:D

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657942 I just noticed this one was blocked 2 years ago I wonder why, as the memory allocation is what it should be for pifast 4.1 - 61372k.

Will this new rank include points, or just a cup?

Non-suspicious scores won't (or at least shouldn't) get blocked if minor details are missing - like resolution and/or CPUZ memory tab. Basically, this just creates more work for the mods - and less time to moderate scores that have REAL issues.

I think I did a (clumsy) bug report about a year ago that was about this:p I have a feeling I didn't explain the issue very well back then. Good to see it's fixed now

I don't a TDP difference is enough to make a new category, so they should be merged.

You need to manually set the amounts of threads in the "advanced" option of wPrime.

Barron, try to look at this from the moderator perspective. If this is not suspicious, then what is? Would be sweet to get some proof from YOU that you actually had the HW you just told us about. This is usually how these cases are solved. ...not saying you've actually done anything wrong here. Just a few thoughts on how we're supposed to do a good job as moderators in a world where it's hard to find bullet proof evidence. Sometimes we have to do something when scores are "suspicious enough".

Sounds pretty stupid to have separate ranks even for singlethreaded benchmarks (which don't benefit at all from the extra cores). I don't know if there was some kind of discussion during the geforce 6 days, but if there was one the arguments are still valid in this case. Besides... there are alot of CPUs that can be unlocked. If you want one, you can always buy one or two more and sell the old one.

That won't help, as I guess 4.703 is still looks slower to the engine than 4.70... or am I wrong here?

Ticket ID: 517 Priority: High Crap. An error happened.\r\n\r\nWe could blame this on you but it\'s most likely our crappy coding skills. You could try again or nudge our developpers for fixing this.\r\nError message\r\norg.apache.torque.NoRowsException: Failed to select a row.\r\nError stack trace\r\norg.hwbot.persistence.base.BaseResultPeer.retrieve ByPK line 1447\r\norg.hwbot.persistence.base.BaseResultPeer.retrieve ByPK line 1421\r\norg.hwbot.persistence.base.BaseResultPeer.retrieve ByPK line 1385\r\norg.hwbot.web.actions.ResultRankChangeAction.run line 63\r\norg.hwbot.web.actions.HwbotAction.execute line 29\r\norg.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processA ctionPerform line 431\r\norg.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process line 236\r\norg.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process line 1196\r\norg.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doGet line 414\r\njavax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service line 690\r\n\r\n***********\r\n\r\nI got this one when I tried to check the recently changed scores page. This error only happened after I changed team to PURE, not before. I also seem to have lost 100 points, 24 golden cups and some other silverware.\r\n\r\nWhen I count the gold cups on the old profile page it gives me 528 (should be 552). What on earth happened here?

I dont think I have time to move scores until next week;) But we'll see.

Ticket ID: 512 Priority: Low http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=890130

Because you're not in top 20 for HD4890 CF (2, 3 and 4 cards all get classified as CF).

Ticket ID: 510 Priority: Low http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=889781

Ticket ID: 506 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=674710\r\n\r\nThanks for adding the others so fast, btw

Ticket ID: 504 Priority: Low Same as Opteron 866, but 200MHz lower frequency.\r\n\r\nI will submit scores once it\'s added, can\'t see an image upload tab here

Ticket ID: 503 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=673840

Ticket ID: 502 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=673839

Ticket ID: 501 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=673837

Ticket ID: 500 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=673837

Ticket ID: 499 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=673826

Ticket ID: 498 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=673825

Ticket ID: 497 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=673815